Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Uncategorized
  2. chevron-right
13 December 2017updated 09 Sep 2021 6:07pm

What does a meaningful parliamentary vote on Brexit actually look like?

Clue: not what the government is suggesting. 

By Eloise Todd

On Wednesday, David Davis wrote an early morning letter to Conservative MPs promising that the government would guarantee a vote in Parliament in October 2018 on the deal it will have negotiated with the EU. These promises are not worth the paper they are written on. MPs are due to vote this evening on an amendment put forward by former Attorney General and Conservative MP Dominic Grieve to ensure Parliament gets a meaningful vote on the final deal the government agrees with EU negotiators.

The amendment has wide cross-party support, including, we hope around 15 Conservative MPs – enough to potentially defeat the government.

If the government is sincere in what it says, not to mention keen to avoid an embarrassing defeat, it should just accept Dominic Grieve’s Amendment 7, which truly guarantees a meaningful vote by writing it into the EU Withdrawal Bill itself.

Grieve’s Amendment 7 makes the powers the government wants to give itself via the EU Withdrawal Bill to carry out Brexit conditional on a vote in Parliament. This means MPs would be able to decide whether to approve whatever deal Theresa May comes up with in negotiations with the EU.

Amendment 7 makes a legal guarantee that the government has to listen to what Parliament has to say. At present, the EU Withdrawal Bill gives those powers to the government without any oversight. The fact the government won’t accept Amendment 7 proves it does not really care about parliamentary sovereignty. It wants the vote next October to be ornamental and meaningless – a rubber stamp on whatever it has already decided.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Its unwillingness to listen to Parliament and even to its MPs shows just how fragile this government is. A sensible amendment like this should be easy for it to accept and incorporate into its plans.

Content from our partners
How automation can help telecoms companies unlock their growth potential
The pandemic has had a scarring effect on loneliness, but we can do better
Feel confident gifting tech to your children this Christmas

Instead, it is attempting to stage a shambolic and pointless battle of wills with Conservative moderates who support the amendment. While Davis has been applying a soft touch, Chief Whip Julian Smith has been reportedly been readying a sharpened carrot overnight, trying everything from cajoling to arm-twisting to force the moderates back under thumb.

What’s even more shameful than this whole shambles is the government’s decision to give back the whip last night to Anne Marie Morris – the Conservative MP suspended for the last five months for disgusting racist remarks – in order to boost its numbers in the vote this evening.

Moderate Conservative and even some waivering Labour MPs need to stand firm this evening against these dirty tactics and ensure a meaningful vote is written into law.

Eloise Todd is the chief executive at Best for Britain, which is campaigning for a meaningful vote on the final Brexit deal. Follow her @eloisetodd.