Support 100 years of independent journalism.

19 August 2014updated 28 Jun 2021 4:44am

Labour MP Austin Mitchell: more women in parliament could be a “worrying matter”

In an odd tirade in the Mail, the Labour MP for Great Grimsby warned that the increasing number of women in the Labour party could weaken parliament.

By Media Mole

The Labour MP for Great Grimsby, Austin Mitchell, who is standing down in 2015, has written an attack in the Mail against the “feminisation” of parliament. He unhappily claims that the Labour party’s “obsession” with all-women shortlists is making parliament preoccupied with social, educational and family issues (the horror), and warns that this increasing number of women would make a future Labour government less able to focus on international issues, and would lessen the quality of “oratory” in the Commons. This is coming from an MP who changed his name briefly to “Austin Haddock” to champion key fishing concerns of his constituents.

He also called female MPs “more amenable and leadable and less objectionable”, aside from any “obsessive feminism”. He also suggested that female candidates are less suited to the “hairy-arsed local politics” of some constituencies, where it would be “better to choose a man”.

His comments caused outrage among MPs from both sides of the House, with fellow Labour MP and senior party figure Tessa Jowell telling the Telegraph that his argument is “complete nonsense, and shadow childcare minister Lucy Powell added, “Austin Mitchell’s sexist and misogynistic comments only highlight further the need for Parliament to modernise and better represent the people of the country, including women and others.”

Tory defence minister Anna Soubry called on the Labour leader to condemn his MP’s remarks: “Austin Mitchell’s at it again, talking nonsense and insulting women with his absurd theories. To say that women don’t care about the big issues is just not true! Ed Miliband should make it absolutely clear he doesn’t agree with Mitchell’s ridiculous remarks.”

Mitchell’s tirade also included criticism of younger politicians apparently being favoured above the “oldies”, cautioning that, “the past has become another party, and Labour’s pool of experience is being drained, which is perhaps just as well because the bright, bushy-tailed new boys and girls think they know it all anyway.”

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Hmm. With unreconstructed views like these, it’s no surprise Mitchell’s decision not to run again in the next general election was apparently met with some enthusiasm by Ed’s office…

Content from our partners
How to create a responsible form of “buy now, pay later”
“Unions are helping improve conditions for drivers like me”
Transport is the core of levelling up

UPDATE 19 August, 16:54

Mark Ferguson of LabourList is reporting that a spokesman for Ed Miliband has condemned Mitchell’s view on women in parliament as “ridiculous and wrong”: