Support 100 years of independent journalism.

11 July 2010

Clarence House inadvertently confirms Charles went into a sulk over the Pope

“That is an event, not a meeting,” spokesman says.

By James Macintyre

Last night, I wrote about how the Prince of Wales has appeared to indulge in one of his characteristic sulks over failing to win a one-to-one meeting with the Pope during the latter’s visit to the UK in September. The very notion has caused defenders of the prince to splutter into their teacups.

But proof of the prince’s mentality, which seems more geared towards competing with his (admirable) mother than to doing his duties, is summed up in this report of the official reaction by Clarence House:

“There were discussions between the Vatican and Clarence House about the possibility of having a separate meeting while the Pope was in Edinburgh, but there wasn’t time in his schedule for that,” said the spokesman.

Asked why the Prince could not join the Queen and Prince Philip at Holyrood for the Pope’s royal welcome, the spokesman said: “That is an event, not a meeting.”

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

By the way, to those who leave comments asking “Who cares?”, I apologise for posting on this subject again, but suggest you consider — especially if you are republicans, as you imply — that the bizarre actions of the heir to the throne are, like it or not, of national importance.