Support 100 years of independent journalism.

23 June 2008updated 24 Sep 2015 11:01am

Porn, privacy and the US judge

The lessons we can all learn from the curious case of the obscenity trial judge whose sexually graph

By Debra Saunders

Any 20-year-old can tell you: There is no privacy on the Internet. So why didn’t Judge Alex Kozinski — at 57 the new chief judge of the federal appeals court — realise that when he set up to store family and private documents, that one of his legal adversaries was likely to trawl the site, and use any taste-challenged sexually-graphic contents on the site to tarnish his reputation?

Kozinski told the San Francisco Chronicle’s Bob Egelko that he wasn’t sure whether he or another family member had intentionally stored the sexually explicit images, as the judge took responsibility for the site’s contents. “I haven’t gone through and looked at it. Some of it, I should have … I had no intention of making these files public.” After the Times story, Kozinski shut down the site. And Kozinski’s wife was right to point out that many of the images described as pornographic more rightly should be described as humorous – if a teenage boy’s idea of humour.

There was nothing illegal on the site, and as a citizen Kozinski had every right to look at and post the images. Unfortunately for him, the timing of the story — as Kozinski was presiding over a closely-watched obscenity trial — prompted Kozinski to recuse himself and declare a mistrial. Kozinski also asked the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ Judicial Council to investigate whether he had engaged in misconduct.

There is no reason to believe the investigation will find any wrong-doing. And while you have to ask yourself what Kozinski was thinking, you cannot ignore the education value of this episode for all adults: When video and sexually-explicit images are involved, the universe of newsworthy figures and items expands. What one person finds funny, another describes as indecent – and you may become the global recipient of your own joke.

Wrote blogger Lawrence Lessig: “The real story here is how easily we let such a baseless smear travel – and our need is for a better developed immunity (in the sense of immunity from a virus) from this sort of garbage.”

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A weekly round-up of The New Statesman's climate, environment and sustainability content. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Oh, and there is no privacy any more.

Topics in this article: