New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. The Staggers
26 September 2024

Keir Starmer targets Russia at UN Security Council

The Prime Minister said Moscow's war on Ukraine was the “greatest violation of the UN charter in a generation”.

By Freddie Hayward

That Keir Starmer would continue the Conservatives’ full-throated support for Ukraine was never in question. But, at the UN Security Council yesterday, it became clear that his reason for doing so is slightly different from the Tories. He delivered a bullish, impassioned condemnation of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Flanked by David Lammy and the UK’s ambassador to the UN, Barbara Woodward, he called it “illegal” and the “greatest violation of the UN charter in a generation”.

It’s worth quoting the Prime Minister in full:

“I wonder how Russia can show its face in this building – 600,000 Russian soldiers have been killed and wounded in this war. And for what?  The UN Charter, which they sit here to uphold, speaks of human dignity, not treating your own citizens as bits of meat to fling into the grinder.”

Beforehand, Starmer called for a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. “There is no military solution here,” he insisted. But his language was much more guarded; his primary focus was clearly uttering the strongest possible condemnation of Putin’s war in Ukraine and, more importantly, ensuring “accountability for those violating the UN charter”.

Remember that in opposition Starmer made restoring Britain’s reputation on human rights and international law a central promise. His voice would ring with genuine emotion when condemning the Tories for their insouciant approach to international constraints. His Security Council speech was the clearest example yet that Starmer intends to deliver on that promise.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Boris Johnson was strident in his support for Ukraine, no doubt. But Starmer’s framing is different: he is condemning Russia because they have violated international law and the UN charter itself. Johnson was motivated by a Churchillian fight against a tyrannical aggressor but his government was happy to admit to their own breaking of international law, as they did with regards to trade in Northern Ireland, for instance.

Starmer speaks in similar moral terms, sure. But the former human rights lawyer is more comfortable reasoning through laws. The Prime Minister’s speech, therefore, should be seen as affirmation that this new government will stand behind the international law and the system it underpins.

[See also: The Netanyahu doctrine will fail in Lebanon]

Content from our partners
The UK’s skills shortfall is undermining growth
<strong>What kind of tax reforms would stimulate growth?</strong>
How to end the poverty premium