Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Spotlight
  2. Elections
16 August 2018updated 09 Sep 2021 3:01pm

The Evening Standard has more to lose from taking on Sadiq Khan than the Mayor does

The paper's claim that the Mayor has failed to act over Labour anti-Semitism isn't credible and will alienate readers. 

By Stephen Bush

Is there an election going on? The Evening Standard has launched a remarkable attack on Sadiq Khan in its leader column today, castigating London’s Mayor for his failure to speak out on anti-Semitism within the Labour party.

It’s particularly striking because viewers of BBC Breakfast will have, just yesterday, heard the Mayor condemn Labour’s inaction on the issue and call for the party to do what City Hall has already done and implement the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of anti-Semitism in full. Nor it is the first time that Khan has stuck his neck out on the issue, both as Mayor of London and as Labour’s candidate.

You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to read the editorial, note that the Conservative Party is currently selecting a candidate to challenge Khan in 2020, remember the politics of the Standard and its current editor (George Osborne), and conclude that the editorial has been driven by opposition to Khan’s wider political programme, rather than his actions over the issue of Labour anti-Semitism.

The attack strikes at the core of one of Khan’s biggest political assets: his role as an ambassador for the city and its values. Outside of that, the Mayor has very few big-ticket items he can claim to have delivered since entering City Hall, beyond the Hopper fare, which is a significant saving for Londoners who commute via pay-as-you-go on the buses, but the majority of those people are firmly in the Labour column anyway. The city is still building too few houses, pedestrianisation of the capital’s centre has stalled, and London has not been immune to the countrywide increase in the crime rate.

So will the Standard’s change of gear hurt Khan? I doubt it, to be honest. It’s worth noting that the news editors of the Jewish News and Jewish Chronicle, the two community papers that serve the capital, have already criticised the editorial. While talk of Khan having done significantly better than Jeremy Corbyn in London is generally overstated, the Jewish community is one area where the Mayor performed considerably better than the Labour leader.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

And while the Standard going free was a masterstroke as far as the long-term viability of the paper was concerned, the concomitant loss of the billboards that once dotted the capital means that even a virulently anti-Khan message is not going to be seen by anywhere near as many people. After all, the Standard boosted Zac Goldsmith’s dog whistle campaign against Khan last time, and he still won comfortably.

If someone does come off the worse from the clash, it may well be the Standard. The paper is now consistently anti-Theresa May, anti-Boris Johnson and anti-Brexit, which is at a remove from the politics of much of suburban London. It is anti-Jeremy Corbyn which puts it at odds with much pro-Remain and social liberal opinion in the inner city. Now it is anti-Sadiq Khan, a rare politician who has managed to straddle those divides well in London, and who the title’s politics should surely be aligned with, if its editorial column is to be anything other than the airing of grudges. 

Content from our partners
How to create a responsible form of “buy now, pay later”
“Unions are helping improve conditions for drivers like me”
Transport is the core of levelling up