Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Spotlight
2 December 2016updated 09 Sep 2021 1:56pm

Lancashire fracking debate: the council’s view

The government’s decision to overturn Lancashire’s fracking vote doesn’t say much for their commitment to devolution, writes Jennifer Mein, leader of Lancashire County Council  

By Jennifer Mein

A key central government policy of recent years has been the devolution of power to a local level, predicated on a belief that people who know most about their area are best placed to make decisions which affect the lives of those who live there.

But the secretary of state’s decision to overturn Lancashire County Council’s refusal of an application to drill and frack for shale gas provides a lesson in how localism fares when it collides with one of the government’s strategic priorities.

Here in Lancashire we’ve enthusiastically embraced the opportunity to take more decisions locally, and are already beginning to see the benefit of closer working between local government, communities,and businesses when targeting investment in skills, transport and growth.

Many of these investments have involved improvements to roads and other infrastructure, often with the need to first gain permission through the planning regime. While major developments often split opinion, one of the strengths of planning in the UK is that applicants can appeal against decisions that go against them. And as part of that process, the secretary of state has long had the power to recover the final decision.

However, it is easy to understand the frustration and anger felt by those in our community who opposed the applications and now find their local representatives over-ruled by the secretary of state – a member of
a government that has made very clear its determination to see shale gas exploited on a large scale.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Fracking is clearly a very emotive subject, the evidence for which became most clear to me upon seeing the tens of thousands of responses which arrived in our mailroom over the course of the planning consultation. The majority expressed their concerns that this industry might start to operate in the county, but many identified potential benefits and stated their support.

Our planning committee certainly felt the weight of responsibility placed on them in taking what would be held as a landmark decision, and were reminded of the depth of feeling generated by the subject by the good-natured but noisy demonstrations attended by hundreds outside County Hall during deliberations.

Throughout this process, those local councillors sought to consider the applications on their merits according to planning law. They listened carefully to views on all sides of the debate and made their decisions on that basis.

Content from our partners
Helping children be safer, smarter, happier internet explorers
Power to the people
How to power the electric vehicle revolution

Our individual county councillors hold different and sometimes opposing views, reflecting the wide range of public opinion on the subject, but we have been united as a council in twice calling on the government to support industry-specific regulation to address local people’s concerns. 

We have asked the government to lift the covers off a heavily redacted report about the potential impact of shale gas exploration on rural economies. And we have asked the government not to take planning decisions out of local hands.

We have done all this because this is what local government does, across the country, day in and day out.  We understand our communities and are best placed to represent them, and make decisions that affect them.

Regardless of how the secretary of state’s decision plays out – and there will be more legal twists and turns yet – the fact remains that residents and businesses in Lancashire made their views known and their councillors made their decisions based on all of the evidence put to them. 

That the government then overturned three of those decisions gives weight to a suspicion that localism only applies until the centre disagrees, and highlights the gulf between people seeking reassurance and answers and a government that will not supply them.