Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Quickfire
7 December 2022

We have not “run out of money” to pay strikers

The government’s dodging the crux of the matter: the public sector is expected to provide more for less.

By Tony Yates

The government’s position on public sector pay – at least if anonymous briefings to the broadcaster Robert Peston and others are to be taken at face value – shows evidence either of poor economics or a risky political calculation, as ministers confront industrial disputes with railway workers, nurses and teachers.

One part of the poor economics is a claim that the government has “run out of money”. The other is that if it gave in, higher pay would fuel inflation, and that would make us all poorer. Little of this makes much sense.

The government has not “run out of money”. It could fund more generous public sector pay deals out of higher taxes; or it could cut public services, in other words paying workers more generously but employing fewer of them. It doesn’t want to do either of these because Tory MPs are ideologically ill-disposed to higher taxes and might not support them. And explicit cuts to already embattled public services would be politically unpopular.

It is not strictly true either that more generous public sector pay would fuel inflation. If this were funded by higher taxes, demand in the economy would be no higher. Even if the government chose to fund public sector pay increases out of borrowing, which it could do, albeit only temporarily, the Bank of England would respond with higher interest rates to choke off higher inflation. Moreover, if an inflationary impulse were tolerated it would not necessarily impoverish us, because money wages tend to keep up with inflation when responding to events like this.

Rishi Sunak’s government is dredging up another canard from his campaign which is, roughly: “If only we had kept a lid on inflation, the cost of living would not have risen and we would not be poorer.”

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

The real problem we are facing is that the literal cost of living – the cost of food and energy and the things we need to sustain life – has gone up relative to the cost of everything else, most importantly what we get back from selling our labour, thanks mainly to Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. (It has been aggravated by disruptions to supply chains caused by the aftermath of Covid, the ongoing epidemic in China and, in the case of the UK, trade frictions caused by Brexit.) Inflation was our chosen solution, not the problem. It was the least painful way for an unavoidable lowering in the real standard of living to happen, the alternative being a large recession to drive down wages in money terms.

Content from our partners
Harnessing breakthrough thinking
Are we there yet with electric cars? The EV story – with Wejo
Sherif Tawfik: The Middle East and Africa are ready to lead on the climate

The correct and honest way to think about public sector pay if you are in government is to start from the amount and quality of public services you want – or have promised – to deliver. That plan in turn is going to be bound up with what taxes you think you can defend and the economy can sustain. You then pay what the labour market requires you to pay to recruit and retain the workers you need to run those public services.

The government no doubt hopes it can either squeeze public sector workers, getting the same services for less, degrade services in a less visible way, and profit from the conflict caused by trying to, or some combination of all three.  

This strategy, dubious even on political grounds, is economically short-sighted. One consequence of the NHS crisis seems to be a large fall in labour supply due to ill health, probably caused by a combination of long Covid and conditions normally treated promptly being aggravated by long waiting lists. A record 2.5 million people say they are out of work due to long-term sickness now. Addressing this problem – meaning at a minimum paying wages adequate to fill vacancies and reduce turnover – could well more than pay for itself in terms of increased labour supply and the resulting tax revenues, aside from helping to alleviate a lot of suffering.

[See also: Keir Starmer interview: “Am I aiming to be just a one-term prime minister? No, of course not”]