Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Quickfire
4 November

Sizewell C must go ahead

Nuclear energy provides hope for the climate emergency – and our energy bills.

By Zion Lights

The government has moved swiftly to deny a BBC report today, 4 November, that it was considering to review whether or not to continue to invest in the Sizewell C nuclear plant. A government official had told the broadcaster that all major projects were under review, including the plant, which is under construction on the Suffolk coast and will provide power to over six million homes when it is operational in the 2030s.

When the initial report was published it was notable that Adrian Ramsay, co-leader of the Green Party, immediately tweeted that he was “pleased” to see the review taking place, arguing that Sizewell would take too long to complete and that renewables are the way forward.

However, he forgets that renewables cannot be built immediately either. In France the average offshore wind farm takes eight to ten years to build. Ramsay’s statement that nuclear energy is a “burden” goes against the scientific consensus that nuclear energy is needed to help the world give up fossil fuels. Renewables also have an environmental impact that people prefer to ignore.

The two most common arguments against nuclear energy that I encounter in my work as a science communicator are how much nuclear power plants cost, and how long they take to build. Build time is a valid concern, as we do need to transition to clean energy sooner rather than later. However, this is a political issue rather than a technological one; in some countries new reactors are built in as little as three years, and the average build time is seven and a half years. In fact, research shows that standardisation – using the same workers to build the same reactor models again and again – brings down costs and build time.

When it comes to cost, for one thing no cost is too high to tackle the climate emergency and prevent the millions of deaths that occur every year due to air pollution from fossil fuels (not to mention the other environmental costs of fossil fuels). There are also ways to make nuclear more cost effective, and we should implement them.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Above all, stalling on nuclear projects doesn’t help. As with all major construction projects, investors want to know that they will be completed. The UK government has gone back and forth on nuclear for decades. Had more reactors been signed off a decade ago, we wouldn’t be in an energy crisis right now, and facing a winter of planned blackouts.

Blackouts are dangerous; people already die in cold winters in England and Wales (usually vulnerable people and those who live in deprived areas). Now, as energy prices rise, leading to electricity bills quadrupling for some households and businesses, casualties can only increase.

Content from our partners
What are the green skills of the future?
A global hub for content producers, gaming and entertainment companies in Abu Dhabi
Insurance: finding sustainable growth in stormy markets

Meanwhile there is little mention of the workers who will lose their jobs if Sizewell doesn’t go ahead, and the valuable skills that will be lost with them. Nuclear workers are climate heroes; without them, we cannot dig ourselves out of the multiple crises we currently face.

If we really want to bring down energy bills in the long run, tackle greenhouse emissions and reduce our reliance on Russian gas imports, then we need to stop stalling and commit to getting these reactors built.

[See also: How sustainable is nuclear energy?]

Topics in this article: , , ,