Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Quickfire
14 April

Why send economic migrants to Rwanda when Britain needs them?

It's not just immoral ⁠— we're paying Rwanda to take working-age people that our ageing population needs.

By Anoosh Chakelian

After briefing the announcement six times previously in moments of political difficulty, the government has officially revealed its intention to send migrants arriving via the Channel to Rwanda. Under the proposals, male asylum seekers who cross the Channel in small boats will be sent to the central African country, because they are “most likely to be economic migrants”, according to the Times.

Perceptive readers may note that now is another vulnerable time for the government — further partygate fines are predicted for Boris Johnson — and that the Rwanda plan is probably legally unworkable anyway due to breaching Britain’s obligations under the UN Refugee Convention and human rights laws. Nearly two thirds of people who migrate to Britain’s shores in small boats are given refugee status and allowed to remain, after all.

But let’s pretend that an incompetent Home Office, which has failed repeatedly to make good on Priti Patel’s promise to stop “100 per cent” of small boat crossings, manages to implement this policy. And let’s put aside the moral and human rights implications of the proposal for one second too.

What, exactly, is wrong with economic migrants? Conservatives and the refugee lobby alike frame such people as somehow less deserving. The government says that they’re not “genuine” refugees, and there is much hand-wringing among human rights groups about when not to use the word “migrant”. That’s not to mention the fact that I at least understood the Tory party to be the party of enterprise, getting on in life, “aspiration” and so on.

Britain has an ageing population and is so short-staffed that flight cancellations are leaving people unable to go on holiday. Why would we stop working-age people who are seeking a more stable financial situation from coming here — and pay Rwanda handsomely for this lost opportunity? (In fact, the government has already conceded this point; in February it relaxed post-Brexit immigration rules to allow more care workers to enter the UK by adding them to the shortage occupation list.)

The solution is not to deport men who travel over on small boats but to open up a safe and legal route for them so that they can stop risking their lives by doing so. But that’s not nearly as good a newspaper headline in a bad week for Boris Johnson.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

Topics in this article: , , , ,