Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
6 April 2017

The universal free school meals reaction shows Labour is damned if it does, damned if it doesn’t

If you are criticising this policy, you should also be hammering the Tories for increasing the basic-rate income tax threshold.

By Anoosh Chakelian

Labour has announced that it would extend free school meals to all primary school children. It would pay for this by introducing VAT on private school fees. As my colleague Stephen writes in his Morning Call, it “ticks all the boxes” of a good opposition policy.

But from the way it’s been received, you wouldn’t think so. The argument from most commentators goes: It is a bad policy, even if it would be popular, so Labour has got it wrong again.

Yes, it has flaws. As Stephen points out, there would be better ways of helping struggling families and stretched school budgets than bunging middle-class families a load of free meals who could afford to pay for them.

But can you imagine if the Conservatives introduced such a policy now? How Theresa May would be praised for her skill in reaching out to middle England, attracting the “just about managing” voters while keeping those with higher incomes content? How she has successfully parked her tanks on Labour’s lawn?

Instead, Labour is hammered for introducing a “popular” proposal at the expense of deeper policy thinking.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

But the party can’t win, can it? Most of the other policies it has recommended so far have been criticised for failing to appeal to the bulk of voters. Too radical, not radical enough, or too focused on the poorest to have any cut-through.

And yet as soon as it does propose a slightly more superficial policy to appeal to middle-class voters – as well as genuinely helping those who are worse-off – it faces claims of “economic incompetence”.

Those who decry this as a hollow, economically-flawed policy aimed purely at wooing voters should really be saying the same about the Tories’ personal tax allowance rise, which comes in today. Another popular-sounding but ultimately regressive policy – yet hailed as a genius vote-winner.

Topics in this article :