Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. The Staggers
9 March 2021updated 23 Jul 2021 1:13pm

What the coverage of Harry and Meghan really reveals about the future of the monarchy

The royal family might be more secure than Harry and his family think.

By Ailbhe Rea

There’s only one story in town this morning, after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey was broadcast in the UK last night.

The royal family is now under pressure to respond to allegations of racism and an alleged failure to support Meghan when she was suicidal, with the Labour leader and frontbenchers describing the allegations as “distressing” and in need of investigation, while Boris Johnson has declined to comment except to emphasise his “highest admiration for the Queen”.

This a huge story, not just about the breakdown of relationships within the royal family, nor about one public figure’s experiences of racism and mental illness, but a far larger one about the monarchy, the conditions that sustain it, and everything in our politics that finds itself reflected in this single story.

[Hear more from Ailbhe on the New Statesman podcast]

When the dust settles, we will recognise that one of the most truly remarkable aspects of that interview was that Harry drew back the curtain on the royal family’s feelings about its own survival. He went on the record to say that his father and brother, the two next in line to the throne, are “trapped”, that everyone in his family is “scared” of the British tabloid press, that it amounts to “control by fear”, referred to within the family as an “invisible contract” upon which the monarchy depends for its survival. It amounted to an acknowledgement of how fragile the monarchy knows itself to be, and how utterly dependent it is on the British tabloid press’s control of public perceptions of the institution.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

[See also: Why Harry and Meghan’s Oprah interview was the most successful in royal history]

The interview included some embarrassing moments for the British press on the international stage, as headlines about Meghan and her sister-in-law Kate Middleton were laid side-by-side for millions of viewers as Oprah and Meghan laughed at the famous discrepancies: when Kate eats avocado it’s a “morning sickness cure”, when Meghan does it’s “linked to human rights abuse and drought, millennial shame”. It is the “symbiotic” relationship between the royal family and the tabloids that meant the monarchy didn’t challenge this coverage at the time, Harry said.

Content from our partners
The shrinking road to net zero
The tree-planting misconception
Is your business ready for corporate climate reporting?

Most papers this morning declare that the Palace is “in crisis” as it decides how to respond. But most of the coverage in the UK is revealing of a fundamental reluctance to have a conversation about the future of the monarchy or to analyse the dynamics discussed by Harry (nor, indeed, to reckon with the place of the British press in this story). That’s the key to the monarchy’s survival: no matter what happens or what revelations are levelled against it as an institution, a discussion about whether it should persist is always viewed as a bit fanatical, a bit weird, a bit gauche. That’s why even serious allegations like these are unlikely to shake the monarchy, and why the royal family is more secure than Harry and his family think.

[See also: Why the Meghan and Harry saga shows the monarchy isn’t fit for the modern world]