The Staggers 8 May 2021 Keir Starmer’s sacking of Angela Rayner is self-destructive, stupid and wrong The Labour leader’s decision has raised questions about his position – and more importantly about his judgement. Getty There is no greater love than this: that a person would lay down his friends for the sake of his life. Sign UpGet the New Statesman's Morning Call email. Sign-up What is there to be said about Keir Starmer’s mystifyingly stupid, self-discrediting and self-destructive decision to sack Angela Rayner as Labour Party chair? Other than the obvious, which is that unless it emerges in relatively short order that Rayner has been quietly defrauding Labour Party funds or running an illicit drug ring, it is mystifyingly stupid, self-discrediting and self-destructive. Bluntly, there is no intelligent analysis of the local elections that would pin the blame on Labour’s deputy leader. These are elections in which the incumbent governments in England, Scotland and Wales have all seen major gains: a picture that defies the idea that what we are seeing is either about a deep-rooted and enduring realignment of the so-called Red Wall behind the Conservative Party or that it is a particular commentary on anything within the gift of Labour. Indeed, a self-assured Labour leader surely had a good counter-narrative to tell: that despite the most favourable backdrop imaginable for a governing party, his party had won the only open mayoral seat (the West of England) and continued its forward march in areas that are trending Labour. Add a note of genuine praise for some of the government’s achievements with something slightly radical – say, by praising the furlough scheme, noting that it had prevented a crash in incomes during the pandemic and proposing the introduction of a six-month furlough-style scheme for the newly unemployed in perpetuity – conduct a quiet reconstruction of parts of his office in reflection of the handful of things that went wrong within Labour’s control, and focus on the issues that will actually decide the next election: crime and climate change, say. The current political circumstances – the end of lockdown, and with it, booming consumer confidence and economic growth – are not going to last forever. Labour just needed to keep a cool head. Instead, Starmer has decided to scapegoat – or, I think more accurately, try to scapegoat – Rayner. His deputy has privately defended the Labour leader from what she perceived to be unfair criticism, and has taken considerable flank from her own allies on the party’s left. Now she has been rewarded with dismissal from the post of Labour Party chair. The result will likely be both a deepening of Labour’s existing divides and an opening of new wounds, as many MPs who had, until now, regarded Starmer’s leadership as a positive are now left in a state of confusion and anger. (One representative described it as a “fucking joke”.) It must now surely mean that Starmer’s leadership is in considerable peril. But the action is more troubling than that. To be blunt, if you think these election results were primarily in the control of anyone in the Westminster Labour Party, you are not a serious figure, and your political judgement is highly suspect. The party’s leader has now proved himself to be of that mind-set. That is a far bigger problem than a series of bad election results in highly favourable circumstances for the Conservative government. › Labour and the Conservatives have a shared disease: sentimentality Stephen Bush is political editor of the New Statesman. His daily briefing, Morning Call, provides a quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics. He also co-hosts the New Statesman podcast. Subscribe For more great writing from our award-winning journalists subscribe for just £1 per month!