Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
26 July 2018updated 09 Sep 2021 3:27pm

Why I put rivalries aside to condemn the Labour party under Jeremy Corbyn

Under the headline “United We Stand”, three newspapers carrried the same editorial warning against anti-Semitism. 

By Richard Ferrer

Every Thursday, for almost a decade, I’ve cautiously checked social media for the latest Jewish Chronicle and Jewish Telegraph front pages. As editor of rival title Jewish News, seeing if the other community papers have bigger stories, or have presented them in a more engaging way, helps gauge how well I’m doing my job. It’s a fierce but healthy rivalry.

Not this week.

This week I slept with the enemy, and the enemy slept with me.

For the first time (I believe) in the history of British newspapers, three competing publications ran an identical article on the front page.

We did so because of the carefree contempt the Labour party has shown our readers under Jeremy Corbyn.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A weekly round-up of The New Statesman's climate, environment and sustainability content. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Be in no doubt. Many, many Jews in Britain fear Corbynism, to the extent that our fractured community, famed for “two Jews, 22 opinions” has come together as never before.

Today, under the headline “United We Stand”, all three newspapers carry the following editorial:

“The party that was, until recently, the natural home for our community, has seen its values and integrity eroded by Corbynite contempt for Israel and Jews. So, Britain’s three leading Jewish newspapers – Jewish News, Jewish Chronicle and Jewish Telegraph – take the unprecedented step of speaking as one.”

Content from our partners
Prevent and protect – why looking after our oral health begins at home
Polling on the protocol: Westminster is a long way from Northern Ireland
How smart energy can deliver for smaller businesses

It’s been three long and painful years, from the whitewashed Chakrabarti report (at a puny 30-pages, even the author admitted “it won’t keep you up late”), to unpunished Ken Livingstone’s contention that the man who slaughtered six million Jews “supported” a Jewish homeland, to Corbyn’s apparent defence of an anti-Semitic mural (a spokesman later claimed he was defending freedom of speech).

This final indignity compelled thousands of Jews of all hues gather outside Parliament, stating: “Enough is enough.”

Then the final straw – last week’s dilution of the International Holocaust Remembrance Association’s standard definition of anti-Semitism, one followed by the government, 130 local councils and the Crown Prosecution Service. Labour removed and amended four examples relating, you guessed it, to Israel – allowing party members to claim British Jews have dual loyalty to Israel and compare Israel to Nazi Germany, and NOT be accused of Jew hate.

In response, 68 rabbis, from secular to religious, signed a letter compelling the party to stop “claiming to know what’s good for our community in the most insulting and arrogant way”.

Even the Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, weighed in, warning Labour’s watered-down anti-Semitism definition sends “a message of contempt”.

The response from Corbyn’s office? “We will not tolerate anti-Semitism in any form whatsoever.”

The man who could be PM believes the reality-defying guff his party spouts ad nauseam because the phrase “I HATE ISRAEL” is written, in capital letters, through him like Brighton rock. He never breaks character, never reconsiders, never thinks twice.

Corbyn is not a work in progress, he’s a piece of work.

When anti-Semitism or other forms of racism appear in UK political parties, it tends to spread from the bottom up. But the rejection of the standard international definition of anti-Semitism in the Labour party came from the top, and it is this which provoked the three newspapers’ “United We Stand” front page.

Last week, Labour MP Margaret Hodge called Jeremy Corbyn an anti-Semite. The incident sparked a debate about who was more wronged. Perhaps a more profound question to ask is what attracts so many anti-Semites to the Labour party? That answer is sadly all too straightforward: Jeremy Corbyn.

Richard Ferrer is the editor of the Jewish News.