Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
19 November 2018updated 03 Sep 2021 12:44pm

Despite the chaos, Labour is sticking to its line on Brexit

Jeremy Corbyn told the CBI that the Opposition will vote down the Withdrawal Agreement.

By Patrick Maguire

Jeremy Corbyn’s speech at the Confederation for British Industry’s annual conference this afternoon covered ground that will be familiar to anyone who has watched an instalment of Prime Minister’s Questions in the past year.

The Labour leader – received politely in the hall – said much about the need to reconfigure and revitalise the economy through investment in infrastructure, green energy and education. But as was the case with Theresa May’s address to the CBI earlier today, Brexit was at the top of the room’s collective agenda.

Reiterating that Labour would vote against Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreement, the Labour leader attacked the prime minister’s “botched, worst-of-all-worlds deal” and talked up the Opposition’s “alternative plan for a sensible jobs-first deal that could win support in parliament and help bring our country together”, namely a permanent customs union with the EU.

At this point, this is all rote, as was his recitation of Labour’s official line on what it will do when the deal comes before the Commons: “Labour will vote against the government’s deal and if the government cannot get its central policy through Parliament, then we will demand a general election. But if we cannot secure a general election, then we have been clear that all options must remain on the table, including a public vote.” (He added Brexit could act as a catalyst for economic change, which isn’t what a convert to the People’s Vote campaign would say.)

Indeed, Corbyn studiously and successfully avoided committing any meaningful news, and dodged a question from Sky News on whether he would be willing to request an extension to Article 50 to allow a Labour government to renegotiate the deal in Brussels (which he said the EU would allow because the negotiation would not be conducted on the basis of threats to turn the UK into a low-tax economy).

Select and enter your email address Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A quick and essential guide to domestic politics from the New Statesman's Westminster team. A weekly newsletter helping you understand the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email. Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

What, if anything, does this mean? To the extent that it tells us anything, it confirms that the Labour leadership has no intention of changing course ahead of the vote on the Withdrawal Agreement. Corbyn got short shrift from Carolyn Fairbarn, the CBI’s chief executive, as a result. “Firms wants a new relationship based on frictionless trade, services access and a say for the UK over future rules,” she said. “The deal currently on the table opens up this potential, and the last thing businesses want is to go backwards. The government’s deal is not perfect, but with four months to go and the potential of no deal looming progress must be made.”

The response of Teams Corbyn and Starmer to that charge is that there is no majority in the Commons for no deal, which they believe to be a constitutional impossibility anyway – sources close to the shadow Brexit secretary claim that 51 legislative changes would be needed ahead of a no-deal scenario and also argue that it would be politically unsustainable for the executive to pursue it without the consent of the legislature. The line is that no deal “is not an option”. But the likeliest no-deal scenario isn’t optional, it’s the default in the event that, as looks inevitable – due in no small part to Labour’s continuing opposition – May’s deal is voted down. What is still missing on the leadership’s part is a strategy to finesse what happens next.

Content from our partners
How trailblazers are using smart meters to make the move to net zero
How heat network integration underpins "London's most sustainable building"
How placemaking can drive productivity in cities – with PwC