Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
19 November 2018updated 03 Sep 2021 12:44pm

Despite the chaos, Labour is sticking to its line on Brexit

Jeremy Corbyn told the CBI that the Opposition will vote down the Withdrawal Agreement.

By Patrick Maguire

Jeremy Corbyn’s speech at the Confederation for British Industry’s annual conference this afternoon covered ground that will be familiar to anyone who has watched an instalment of Prime Minister’s Questions in the past year.

The Labour leader – received politely in the hall – said much about the need to reconfigure and revitalise the economy through investment in infrastructure, green energy and education. But as was the case with Theresa May’s address to the CBI earlier today, Brexit was at the top of the room’s collective agenda.

Reiterating that Labour would vote against Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreement, the Labour leader attacked the prime minister’s “botched, worst-of-all-worlds deal” and talked up the Opposition’s “alternative plan for a sensible jobs-first deal that could win support in parliament and help bring our country together”, namely a permanent customs union with the EU.

At this point, this is all rote, as was his recitation of Labour’s official line on what it will do when the deal comes before the Commons: “Labour will vote against the government’s deal and if the government cannot get its central policy through Parliament, then we will demand a general election. But if we cannot secure a general election, then we have been clear that all options must remain on the table, including a public vote.” (He added Brexit could act as a catalyst for economic change, which isn’t what a convert to the People’s Vote campaign would say.)

Indeed, Corbyn studiously and successfully avoided committing any meaningful news, and dodged a question from Sky News on whether he would be willing to request an extension to Article 50 to allow a Labour government to renegotiate the deal in Brussels (which he said the EU would allow because the negotiation would not be conducted on the basis of threats to turn the UK into a low-tax economy).

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

What, if anything, does this mean? To the extent that it tells us anything, it confirms that the Labour leadership has no intention of changing course ahead of the vote on the Withdrawal Agreement. Corbyn got short shrift from Carolyn Fairbarn, the CBI’s chief executive, as a result. “Firms wants a new relationship based on frictionless trade, services access and a say for the UK over future rules,” she said. “The deal currently on the table opens up this potential, and the last thing businesses want is to go backwards. The government’s deal is not perfect, but with four months to go and the potential of no deal looming progress must be made.”

The response of Teams Corbyn and Starmer to that charge is that there is no majority in the Commons for no deal, which they believe to be a constitutional impossibility anyway – sources close to the shadow Brexit secretary claim that 51 legislative changes would be needed ahead of a no-deal scenario and also argue that it would be politically unsustainable for the executive to pursue it without the consent of the legislature. The line is that no deal “is not an option”. But the likeliest no-deal scenario isn’t optional, it’s the default in the event that, as looks inevitable – due in no small part to Labour’s continuing opposition – May’s deal is voted down. What is still missing on the leadership’s part is a strategy to finesse what happens next.

Content from our partners
Winning business: changing markets
Gibraltar - impact of Brexit