Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
2 May 2019updated 08 Sep 2021 6:51am

Toby Harris: We need to detoxify political debate in Britain

Why I am introducing a debate in the Lords on the toxicity of debate in public life and the divisions being fostered within our society.

By Toby Harris

Early on last month, Michael Bates resigned as a government minister. But not for the first time.

Three years earlier he stood down to embark on a walk from Buenos Aires to Rio de Janeiro to promote the Olympic Truce. On his return, he was reappointed but then resigned again a year ago because he had arrived in the Lords Chamber a minute too late to answer an oral question. On that occasion, the Prime Minister refused to accept what many thought to be an honourable if rather unnecessary action.

This latest time, Bates is going on another walk, from Belfast to Brussels. The objective this time is to find out how the UK can restore national unity and rediscover our shared common ground. No doubt he hopes the answers will come on his very own road to Damascus, or perhaps Derby or Dartford.

One thing he is right about however, is that questions need answering. That is why I am introducing a debate in the Lords next Thursday on the toxicity of debate in public life and the divisions being fostered within our society.

Such toxicity led to the murder of Jo Cox in the run up to the European referendum, since when politics has – if anything – become even more fractured. Threats to MPs have rocketed with 142 offences recorded in 2017, rising to 270 last year. Death threats are now commonplace. MPs’ homes and offices are attacked and their constituency staff intimidated.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday - from the New Statesman. The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates. Weekly analysis of the shift to a new economy from the New Statesman's Spotlight on Policy team.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Evidence received by the Committee on Standards in Public Life put it starkly: “The tone of modern political discourse permeates through society and normalises abusive and … aggressive language.”  

Does this matter? A poll commissioned by the Daily Mirror found that three-quarters of the public now feel that the country is more divided than ever before. And perhaps unsurprisingly, four in five have lost faith in British politics.

Content from our partners
What is the point of inheritance tax?
How to win the next election? It's the data, stupid
Businesses must unlock the regional growth agenda

This does not bode well for the health of our democracy, with a weakened centre and increasingly polarised politics giving legitimacy to more extreme views. A situation that is exacerbated when those in public life – politicians and commentators especially – fail to confront and answer extremist arguments.

If to ignore is to condone, worse still is to echo and pander to such views. Yet at the same time, a failure to talk meaningfully about the impact of immigration on our economy and society is one step away from legitimising the stirring up of hatred against migrants and asylum seekers. Demonising one minority leads to the isolation and exclusion of others – a slippery path that has led elsewhere to pogroms and genocide. Let’s not forget how quickly civilised norms broke down in Kosovo and Rwanda.

True political leadership is not about following the basest instincts of those whose support you seek.  Instead, it should be about educating, persuading and inspiring – and taking on intolerant views and calling them out.

A first step is for our political parties to put their own houses in order. For Labour, that means ending the denial and prevarication so as to eliminate the stench of anti-Semitism emanating from some in our party.  Similarly, the Conservatives must take swifter action against those in their ranks who are bigoted against Muslims.  Only then can either party claim to have the moral authority to address the wider problems in society.

Ultimately, all of us have a responsibility to defend the core values that have shaped our country over the past 75 years. Failure to do so will see the very fabric of our democracy wither and decay. 

Toby Harris of Haringey is chair of the Labour Peers Group. He tweets @LordTobySays.