Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
12 November 2018

Anthony Lester’s suspension raises uncomfortable questions for the Commons authorities

On sexual harassment, the Lords has taken the sort of decisive action the Commons has proven unwilling and unable to. 

By Patrick Maguire

A year on from the sexual harassment allegations that rocked Westminster, parliament has issued its first suspension for inappropriate behaviour – not to any of the MPs accused, but to a peer.

In the longest suspension of an MP or peer since the Second World War, Anthony Lester, who previously sat on the Liberal Democrat frontbench in the Lords, is set to be barred from the upper house until at least June 2022 after its standards watchdog found he had breached its code of conduct by sexually harassing a woman he met and worked with in his capacity as a parliamentarian more than a decade ago.

A 134-page report into Lester’s misconduct – which he denies – concludes that he offered the complainant “corrupt inducement to have sexual relations with her”, “persisted in unwanted touching, even when the complainant clearly objected”, and “persisted in making sexual comments and offers to her, even after she clearly objected”. He was also accused of telling the complainant: “If you sleep with me I will make you a Baroness within a year.”

So grave did the Lords sub-committee on conduct consider the complaint that it originally recommended Lester, who is 82, be expelled, a sanction he successfully appealed on the grounds that no mechanism existed to sack peers at the time of the alleged misconduct. Lester’s punishment is nonetheless severe, however, and is more significant than anything the Commons standards watchdog has done to MPs accused of sexual harassment by the simple fact that it exists (the only disciplinary sanctions given in those cases come from the parties themselves).

It also gives those involved in foundering attempts to beef up procedures for dealing with bullying and harassment in the Commons yet more cause for frustration. To the consternation of many, MPs on its standards committee voted against an investigation historical bullying allegations against John Bercow, the Speaker, in May. The question of whether parliamentary staff will be given the ability to make historical complaints, and have the confidence that proper sanctions will be pursued, is still a live one too. The decisive action taken by the Lords authorities against Lester in the meantime will raise uncomfortable questions as to why the processes available to their Commons counterparts have not delivered similar outcomes – and why politics keeps being allowed to get in the way of replacing them with ones that can.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Content from our partners
How to create a responsible form of “buy now, pay later”
“Unions are helping improve conditions for drivers like me”
Transport is the core of levelling up