The Staggers 19 August 2014 Imagining the “family test” in action since the coalition came in How David Cameron's "family test" would have worked if it had been brought in from 2010. David Cameron's "Family Test" is a ridiculous idea. Photo: Getty Sign UpGet the New Statesman's Morning Call email. Sign-up David Cameron – in a serious policy announcement the weight of which lies somewhere between forcing the Queen to regale her subjects with a discussion about plastic bags and the opposition’s “owls for everyone” coup – has told his eagerly-listening nation of hardworking people that, “every single domestic policy that government comes up with will be examined for its impact on the family”. He’s set up a formalised “family test” for government departments to follow as of October to assess every single piece of policy they are creating for its “family-friendly” credentials. Aside from this being yet another bureaucratic hurdle for harder-pressed Whitehall officials, a vague and hollow measure brought in nine months before an election by a PM whose party needs to boost its support from women, and glaringly ironic considering the coalition’s attitude to families played out by the “bedroom tax”, child benefit cuts, immigration crackdowns and backdoor marketisation of higher education, the prospect of shoe-horning every policy into a “family test” is quite funny. If Cameron had brought in this test when he became Prime Minister in 2010, here’s how some of the coalition’s most prominent plans would have fared: 2011: Defra announces Badger Cull Family-friendly credentials: Terror at badger carcasses littering the countryside may do much to bring Britain’s tragically disintegrating “problem” families closer together, united in horror. Families will be so stricken with disgust they will stand stock-still in forests, fixated by the badgers, giving them a chance to enjoy the outdoors instead of staying in watching television. Non-family-friendly credentials: The idea of exterminating cuddly badgers could traumatise children, which means we may have to budget more for family counselling services. Family test: FAIL 2012: Pasty Tax mooted in Budget (pre-U-turn) Family-friendly credentials: Children wouldn’t eat as many pasties, so they’d be thinner, meaning parents could fit more children into each bedroom, which would lead to more unused rooms in houses and us being able to raise more money from the Bedroom Tax Spare-Room Subsidy. Married couples might eschew Greggs for more sophisticated eateries on their date nights, therefore reducing the divorce rate. Non-family-friendly credentials: Arguments among family members about what constitutes hot takeaway food (if it is bought from the premises cool and later heated, does that count? What about if it is heated up there?) could lead to the collapse of the family unit. Family test: PASS 2012: Cutting the top rate of tax Family-friendly credentials: Children seeing the top tax rate reduced from 50p to 45p may be willing to take a 5p cut in their 50p weekly pocket money, therefore teaching them thrift and meaning they have the ability to buy fewer penny sweets, which is a public health bonus. The Labour party’s inevitable cries of “tax-cut for millionaires” will give rowing families a common enemy (Labour’s sloganeers, not the rich) to rally against, therefore introducing solidarity to the family unit. Non-family-friendly credentials: As George Osborne and his coalition colleagues will have to spend the next three years defending this move, they will have less time to say the phrase “hardworking families”, which could lead to families working less hard. Millionaires throughout the country being better-off might mean they'll run rogue, buy secret shag-pads overseas and be unfaithful to their partners, leading to a break-down in the sanctity of marriage. Family test: FAIL 2013: HS2 government report Family-friendly credentials: A new famous British train in our midst would eclipse the sexist cult of Thomas the Tank Engine, therefore teaching young girls and boys the importance of gender equality. The Phase 1 route from London to Birmingham would mean families from the capital can reach Bourneville quicker for days out at Cadbury World. This would bring joy, laughter and non-sedentary activity to the family unit. Non-family-friendly credentials: More families consuming chocolate in Cadbury World would be a public health risk. Family test: FAIL 2013: Royal charter on press regulation Family-friendly credentials: If the Leveson-recommended press regulator comes in, the only thing left to read in the papers would be the Funday Times, which would be fantastic for children’s cognitive skills and creative faculties. Family test: PASS 2014: Bringing in a “Family Test” for all policy Family-friendly credentials: It will reassure families across Britain that, even though we’ve pretty much finished doing legislation this parliament, we have begun thinking about their best interests in time for the election campaign. Non-family-friendly credentials: It would lead to lists like this. Family test: FAIL › Louise Mensch accidentally calls the father of modern Zionism an anti-Semite Anoosh Chakelian is the New Statesman’s Britain editor. She co-hosts the New Statesman podcast, discussing the latest in UK politics. Subscribe For daily analysis & more political coverage from Westminster and beyond subscribe for just £1 per month!