Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
23 November 2009

De Menezes: the final humiliation

No police accountable; reduced payout to "poor" family

By James Macintyre

First, we learn that the police covered up the details surrounding the 2005 shooting of the innocent Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes.

Next, we learn — no surprise, given the police’s record — that not a single officer or police chief will be held to account over the death.

Now, today, comes the final humiliation for the de Menezes family: news that the amount of compensation relatives will receive will be reduced because they are “poor”. According to the London Evening Standard:

Today it was claimed that the family of the Brazilian, who was mistaken for a suicide bomber and shot seven times in the head at Stockwell Tube station, may receive only around £100,000.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A weekly round-up of The New Statesman's climate, environment and sustainability content. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

It is alleged that lawyers for Scotland Yard and the family have reached an out-of-court settlement.

Although the amount is covered by a confidentiality clause, it has been alleged that it would have been much higher if Mr de Menezes, 27, had left a widow and children or came from a wealthy family.

But when he died on 22 June in 2005, his parents were living in a one-bedroom house deep in the Brazilian rainforest.

Excuse me? If this is true, can the police explain the logic? Surely the poverty of his family should mean a greater, not smaller, payout.

As I first wrote in 2007, this tragic affair could turn out to be one of the great public scandals of the decade.

 

Sign up to the New Statesman newsletter and receive weekly updates from the team