Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
30 January 2007

The ire of Livingstone’s spindoctor

How Bright's blog has put Livingstone in a spin

By Martin Bright

A nasty little email from Ken Livingstone’s main spinner Joy Johnson to my editor:

—–Original Message—–

From: Joy Johnson

Sent: 30 January 2007 14:03

To: john kampfner

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday - from the New Statesman. Sign up directly at The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. Sign up directly at Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates. Weekly analysis of the shift to a new economy from the New Statesman's Spotlight on Policy team.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Subject: FW: Martin Bright on Civilisations conference.


Content from our partners
Resolving the crisis in children’s dentistry
Planetary perspectives: how data can transform disaster response and preparation
How measurement can help turn businesses’ sustainability goals into action

Is this really what your political editor thinks of the Mayor of London and his administration? This was a serious conference – I know blogs are not meant to be that serious but as trivial as this?

… and this is my response:


I’ve just been forwarded your note to John.

The conference was a disgrace. It was a set-up for panellists who didn’t parrot the Ken line on radical Islam. It was genuinely discourteous to people who happened to dissent, who had given up their Saturdays to be shouted at and insulted for over an hour. The chairing of my session was miserable.
Unlike just about everything I have been asked to talk at for free including Islamic groups, I was not so much as thanked for my appearance let alone dropped a note (which is what reputable organisations such as the Fabians and the Social Market Foundation always do). The panel I was on (including the chair) were all opposed to my position, which does not make for an informed and balanced debate. The same was true of several other panels.

The conference was a vastly expensive exercise in right-wing Islamist propaganda. I think it was shameful that the people of London had to pay for this. It was a total sham.

In future why not email me direct or comment directly on my blog.


And this is her measured reaction:

From: Joy Johnson
Sent: 30 January 2007 15:15
To: Martin Bright
Subject: RE:

I will email who I like.

Then a few minutes later:

From: Joy Johnson
Sent: 30 January 2007 15:35
To: Martin Bright
Subject: RE:

You can take issue with the conference the personal abuse was unnecessary.