Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Long reads
16 September 2002

Blair’s dilemma: he can’t rely on the robots

By Philip Cowley

Will there be a significant rebellion of Labour MPs against a war in Iraq? The conventional wisdom is that there will not, that MPs in general are more sheeplike than ever before.

The assumption is wrong. Back-bench loyalty reached its peak under the Tories in the 1950s and early 1960s. There were two sessions in which not a single Conservative MP defied the whip. Since then, MPs have in general become considerably more rebellious. Nor are British MPs especially cohesive by international standards. Compared with almost all other western European parliaments, the sort of behaviour seen at Westminster can appear almost anarchic.

There were 96 back-bench Labour revolts in the 1997-2001 parliament – fewer than in the recent past, but more than in four other full-length postwar parliaments, including 1945-50. When Labour MPs broke ranks, they did so in large numbers, across a broad range of subjects: lone-parent benefit, disability benefit, the terrorism laws, Lords reform, trial by jury, freedom of information, and national air traffic services. The average scale of these back-bench revolts was greater than in all but three other postwar parliaments – and greater than in every period of Conservative government. They involved a total of 133 Labour backbenchers. These cannot be dismissed as the “usual suspects” – even the West Midlands Serious Crime Squad didn’t have that many.

Since the 2001 election, back-bench rebellions have increased, with 66 so far, compared to just 16 in the first session of the 1997 parliament. Labour MPs are now collectively older and more experienced; the back benches are peppered with former ministers and whips, wise to the workings of government.

So what can we expect on Iraq? The numbers signing Alice Mahon’s early day motion have already exceeded 130. Many more – including many hard-core loyalists – are distinctly uneasy in private. The government has previously placated critics with concessions. But it is difficult to see what concessions can be offered in this case. A fresh UN mandate would work wonders with some, if not all, of the critics, as might firm independent evidence linking Iraq with dastardly deeds. But neither looks to be forthcoming at present. The omens are not good for the government. If there is a vote – and the rebels may need to force one – this could prove to be the mother of all rebellions. The myths about poodles and robots may then be laid to rest for good.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Philip Cowley is the author of Revolts and Rebellions: parliamentary voting under Blair, published by Politico’s

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them