Long before John Terry, long before Rupert Lowe, we Chelsea fans were used to getting a certain “look” when somebody asked who we support. One that falls somewhere between an eye roll, an about-take and a micro-aneurysm. Sometimes it came with a grimace, a groan, a jeer or, in some circles, an aggressive chin jut.
From time to time, this antipathy can manifest in bizarre ways. Many moons ago, I was stepping on to a waltzer at a west London funfair with my eight-year-old brother. As we sat down on the ride, his fresh Autoglass-sponsored Chelsea shirt revealed itself from under his jacket. The waltzer operator came over immediately, leaned in, and whispered the immortal words “Chelsea fan are ya? You’re gonna have a really good ride,” before beckoning over his fellow carnies and launching something akin to a Nasa motion sickness training session, which sent us both puking candy floss on to the wet grass.
It was an early lesson in tribalism. Because there has always been something about Chelsea Football Club that many people cannot stomach. It is a club that comes with more baggage than the Changi Airport departures lounge. A team that, to many, represents not just the worst of British football culture, but also the worst of British culture itself and global finance excess. One product of which is John Terry.
First and foremost, there’s the unfortunate, long-standing connection with terrace violence and far-right activity from supporters. Then there’s the location, the name, the dubious links to Kremlin money, the marginally less dubious venture capital money, the royal blue shirts, our strange habit of being able to compete for trophies while being sportingly deficient, and the inherent “flashiness” that pervades the club. We have not one, but two makeshift weapons (a rolled-up newspaper and a credit card jammed in someone’s mouth) attributed to us. Our most famous chant has the word “fuck” in it.
To its detractors, Chelsea is the club of Roman Abramovich, Ken Bates, George Osborne and the hooligan Jason Marriner. We have a Marco Pierre White restaurant in the ground, and had electric fences being installed in the Eighties, and one of our flop wingers is now serving a four-year drug ban for taking “Soviet super-soldier” supplements. And then, of course, there’s John Terry.
Terry is a long-running nightmare in metropolitan, conscientious Britain. Even before his racial abuse incident with Anton Ferdinand in 2011, there was an inkling that he was probably rather right-wing. But now – possibly assured that he will never get the managerial position thanks to an understandably wary boardroom – he’s finally put his politics where his mouth is. And guess what: he isn’t backing Zack Polanski’s party in the Cobham ward.
Responding to one of Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe’s many low-res social media posts, which called for immigrants to be banned from claiming benefits, Terry commented, “100 per cent yes”. This is after he had already liked another Lowe post that bemoaned a Bengali-language sign at Whitechapel station. Terry’s ex-teammate Dennis Wise – no less of a controversial character in his day – then doubled the bet with “200 per cent”. Of course, Wise and Terry are not the only ex-footballers who back right-wing parties (or perhaps even more fringe groups), but it all fuels a certain fire that Chelsea is some kind of hive of viciousness and right-wing thought leadership.
It’s an idea that is hard to argue against. You can point to various club initiatives, a rapidly diversifying fanbase, investment in the women’s game, and being the only top-level Premier League club to have hired two black managers, but it’s a losing battle. When arguably your greatest-ever player – a footballer so omnipresent, so combative, that he transcends “talismanic” and becomes a kind of one-man Chelsea deep state – looks as if he backs Restore, you probably have to take it on the chin. Whenever something like this happens, there is a sense of “I’m going to have to talk about this with someone”, or, “the Gooners I know are going to have a field day with this”.
At times, supporting Chelsea can feel like an antisocial act in itself, like waving cash in a parking warden’s face – or parking your Range Rover in a disabled space (as Terry himself notoriously did). For years my line of defence was generally, “Look, I just support my local team (that isn’t Brentford).” Yet recently I’ve become more gleefully unashamed about supporting Chelsea. All at a time in which we are playing some of the worst football I can remember.
Because as the game becomes more and more enmeshed with lifestyle, social media and “Big Culture”, there is something beautifully, oddly transgressive about supporting a team like Chelsea. Being “Chels” is not something you do to become more popular. It’s not going to get you a promotion at work, or get you featured on a heartwarming TikTok reel about dedicated fans. Granted, you’ll see a few flashes of glory, but largely, it will make life harder for you.
Watching the Arsenal vs City League Cup final game in a south-east London pub recently, surrounded by monied 30-somethings in suspiciously clean, new-edition kits and cash-in merch, it occurred to me that I support a messy, chaotic football team, and not a lifestyle brand or sports entertainment conglomerate. That there is something quite beautiful about following something for no other reason than that you grew up in that milieu and that you were indoctrinated into it.
Chelsea’s media team does try to create a kind of positive mythology around the club, but it never quite works in the way it does for other teams. Our “legacy content” is mostly derivative and falls flat. None of our players are particularly marketable. Cole Palmer is unlikely to present a Department of Education campaign, as some footballers have, and Enzo Fernández remains a difficult, unfulfilled presence in the global “baller” matrix. Our celebrity fan is not Anne Hathaway, but Suggs from Madness. It’s all brilliantly pony – as the local parlance goes.
Football clubs are often tritely compared to religions, but real faith has to come with an element of “why am I doing this? Do I really have to defend this?” In a day and age when a place on the Emirates waiting list seems to come as an employment benefits package at most London offices, supporting Chelsea remains personal, familial and wonderfully unhelpful to wider ambitions. So much so, that you can imagine that even Rupert Lowe isn’t entirely happy with the endorsement of Dennis Wise – or John Terry.
[Further reading: Rupert Lowe and the rise of zombie politics]
Content from our partners
Related
Join the debate
Subscribe here to commentIs there any chance that we can see fewer of these “boys club” faux-matey football articles in the Staggers. Comment on the loathsome Terry in a social analysis piece fine, but please stop assuming that football is some kind of universal bonding experience. It was OK when there was just Hunter Davies, but the virus is now spreading. (As, indeed, is the increasing London-bias of the wider magazine. You used to have a varied and interesting back section covering nature, gardens, food and drink. Now all we get is Finn talking about micro-segments of the London eating-out scene. Has she ever been anywhere else in the country? Apart from Oxbridge, obviously.)
Yours, a long-standing subscriber from north-east England.
London centric journalism, or is it just commentary, prevails throughout the media as the majority of journalists hail from that corner of England and bring their limited perspectives on British society accordingly. The inews gets my goat for this being overly concerned about retired people with million quid plus properties complaining about income problems (answer, in one word, sell and enjoy your equity). Regional coverage eg. on eating out is condescending despite many good chefs having trained in the regions work for top London gaffs. As for Terry well he’s the original inspiration for Millwall’s “everyone hates us” chant.
As a Chelsea supporter for over 70 years (they were the local team of my childhood and my eldest grandchild is fifth generation), with support qualified by greater enthusiasm for underdogs, I was delighted by this article. My primary heroes were never the swaggering combative ones. From the 60s I had Marvin Hinton, the understated anticipation genius reluctantly celebrated by Tommy Smith of all people as someone who played over 200 games and whose fouls wouldn’t cover both hands. From the 1997 cup winners my heroes were his style replica Franck Leboeuf, who justified the “He’s here he’s there he’s every EXPLETIVE DELETED where” chant by later appearing on screen as a bit part in the Stephen Hawking biopic, and Eddie Newton who added a verb (“to Eddie Newton”) to my son’s vocabulary, meaning to dribble slowly into a crowd of opposition players and come out still with the ball. His appearance, when plucked from unemployment, to sit on the bench with Roberto Di Matteo in 2012 for an away cup replay at second tier Birmingham City gave me a hunch that our cup win and European championship win that season were guaranteed; and I loved his “bit of a doddle, this job” quotation at the end. At present I am delighted that the team is being led out at Wembley for the cup final by a manager whose previous history seems equivalent to coaching a primary school second eleven.
Finally a defence to trot out for being both a Rangers and Chelsea supporter.
Football is still a working class sport and it is hardly surprising that there will be many supporters at all clubs who will not get an invite to ‘seminars on cultural appropriation’. However, don’t forget that not long ago many managers in the British game were 100% socialist: e.g. Jock Stein, Alex Ferguson, Bill Shankly, Jack Charlton, Brian Clough, Peter Taylor and they created the greatest teams ever seen. They saw the power of the socialist collective. On the other hand the British working class and in particular the English working class has always had an extreme right wing strand e.g. Alf Garnet. John Terry comes from the Alf Garnet line. So what do you expect from the working class – it’s not a destination but somewhere you try and escape from and that can make you a bit of a hard nut. I support Luton Town FC and many of our best players have been Afro-Carribean and I still vote Labour but I can afford to virue signal. I know many of my fellow fans will be voting Reform but that’s democracy.