Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Culture
  2. Radio & Podcasts
1 December 2021

This year’s Reith Lectures ask: will artificial intelligence save or destroy us?

What could be more festive than contemplating the extinction of the human race by robot overlords.

By Anna Leszkiewicz

The nights draw in, the air turns cold – what could be more festive than contemplating the extinction of the human race by robot overlords? This year’s BBC Reith Lectures are being given by Stuart J Russell, a Brit, born in Portsmouth, who founded the Center for Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence at Berkeley, and literally wrote the book on artifical intelligence (AI).

Russell begins by giving a brief overview of AI, starting with the first successful learning program. Arthur Samuel’s draughts-playing computer proved on television in 1956 that it had learned to beat its own creator; the first self-driving Mercedes went on the autobahn in 1987. Over the past decade, deep learning systems have evolved to recognise human speech, objects and images, and today, AI is a crucial component of the economy, used in everything from search engines to autonomous delivery planes.

[See also: What the history of the vacuum cleaner tells us about our attitudes to work]

Still, Russell has serious concerns over AI’s rise. He quotes Francis Bacon, writing in 1609: “The mechanical arts may be turned either way, and serve as well for the cure as for the hurt.” The hurt inflicted by AI includes racial and gender bias, disinformation, deep fakes and cyber crime – even deadly weapons.

Russell looks at social media content algorithms as a key example. These algorithms aren’t, Russell explains, “particularly intelligent – and yet they have more power over people’s cognitive intake than any dictator in human history”. Designers believed these algorithms would maximise click-through by showing users more of what they already like. Instead, they learned “to modify the state of [their] environment – in this case the user’s mind – to maximise [their] own reward, by making the user more predictable. A more predictable human can be fed items they are more likely to click on – users with more extreme preferences seemed to be more predictable.” We’ve all witnessed the results.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

With later instalments on weaponry, work and how humans can keep control over machines, Russell’s lectures are funny, accessible and deeply terrifying.

[See also: How the culture wars began]

Content from our partners
How to create a responsible form of “buy now, pay later”
“Unions are helping improve conditions for drivers like me”
Transport is the core of levelling up

The Reith Lectures BBC Radio 4,
aired 1 December, 9am; now on catch-up

This article appears in the 01 Dec 2021 issue of the New Statesman, The virus strikes back