Morning Call: pick of the papers

The ten must-read pieces from this morning's papers.

Sign Up

Get the New Statesman's Morning Call email.

1. Get Rupert Murdoch on the Leveson inquiry stand (Guardian)

David Cameron is naive to rely on the police to get to the truth. Geoffrey Robertson says that Leveson must be unleashed on News International -- now.

2. Scrutiny or mutiny? On with the revolution (Times) (£)

The expenses firestorm did little to improve our politics, says David Aaronovitch. Will we do any better after this furore over the press?

3. News Corp is all about the family (Financial Times)

No one pretends the company is managed according to any other principle than what Rupert Murdoch wants, says John Gapper.

4. Now we know who runs the country (Independent)

Steve Richards argues that we need to know a lot more about the activities of bankers, business leaders, civil servants, police, and the media.

5. BSkyB: Can Rupert Murdoch pull himself back from the brink one more time? (Guardian)

Emily Bell suggests that the task of clearing out the muck from News International's stables may be insurmountable.

6. Will this judge really be on the people's side? (Times) (£)

Camilla Cavendish warns that if regulation of the press is too tight it will benefit the corrupt and the overpowerful -- not ordinary citizens.

7. Murdoch, like Napoleon, is a great bad man (Financial Times)

The fault lies with the establishment and its cowardice towards someone whose nature was well known, writes Conrad Black.

8. One battle won. Now will MPs fight for their liberal values? (Guardian)

Politicians' cravenness towards the powerful did not just affect the media, says John Kampfner. It distorted crime, banking and immigration policy.

9. Cameron masters the Commons, but can he convince the country? (Daily Telegraph)

An error of judgment is one thing, says Bruce Anderson, but the PM must now tell us what he stands for.

10. Palestinians only have one option now (Independent)

Time is running out is a phrase so overused in diplomacy that it has ceased to have any meaning, says Adrian Hamilton.