Politics 30 September 2009 The BBC on the BNP Radio 1's Newsbeat interview is shameful Sign UpGet the New Statesman's Morning Call email. Sign-up Regular readers of this blog will know that I tend to harp on about the self-serving, right-wing "myth" of the BBC's supposed "liberal left bias". For those who remain unconvinced, let me point you towards Radio 1 Newsbeat's "interview" with two "young BNP members", on the BBC website. It is so staggeringly soft, woefully weak and uncritically unchallenging that I feel sick to my stomach. Here, in full, is the absurd attempt at rigorous and impartial journalism on the BBC (I mean, Radio 1, what is the point of it?): Do you think it's OK for people who aren't white in this country to call themselves British? Joey: Civic-ly British they are. You cannot say they are ethnically British. It's denying our heritage. It's taking that away from us. At what point do they become ethnically British? How long do they have to be here? Joey: Well I think it would be an awfully long time before someone would become ethnically British. So when you see someone like Ashley Cole play for England, are you happy to watch him? Joey: If he wants to come to this country and he wants to live by our laws, pay into society, that's fine. But if he wanted to call himself British that would be a problem? Joey: He cannot say that he's ethnically British. Why is the idea of races mixing such a bad thing? Joey: If everybody integrated it would take away everybody's identity. Mark: I would be upset if there were no more giant pandas, I'd be upset if there were no more lions, if there were no more tigers, so equally I'd be upset if white people weren't here any more. But we're the same species which makes it a bit different, doesn't it? Mark: You could say that but if all of a sudden there weren't any sparrows and there were only crows, I'd still be sad there weren't any sparrows. Can you understand that some people are happy to mix? Mark: No, I think people have been brainwashed. I think the media, the government, have forced it down people's throats and they've indoctrinated people. You don't think people are bright enough to decide themselves? Mark: I think when people are bombarded 24 hours a day to force multiculturalism upon them, people are going to succumb to that. We shouldn't have to bend our ways to people who've been here five minutes. You're talking like people here are on holiday. They've lived here, some of them, for a generation, some of them for longer. Doesn't that count? Mark: Are you trying to compare somebody, or a group of people who've lived here for maybe 30 years, to people who've lived here for 40,000 years? There's a vast, vast difference in time scale there, my dear. My point isn't the difference in times between one group of people and another, it's saying they're not visitors, they are not holidaymakers, they are people living here. Mark: If I went to live and work in another country, then I would still adhere by their culture and they should adhere by ours. Is anyone else as shocked as I am by the soft, naive, piss-poor questioning? Why the pleading tone from reporter Debbie Randle? Where in the interview are these two BNP "kids" properly challenged - on the criminal convictions and dubious backgrounds of leading BNP figures; the party's nakedly racist, Islamophobic and anti-Semitic discourse; the BNP's policies on (voluntary) repatriation and mixed-marriage bans, etc? Why is the piece headline "Young BNP members explain their beliefs", as if they are innocent members of, say, Amnesty International or on an Alpha course, rather than of a party whose members are banned from becoming police officers or prison officers? In May, the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) published "race reporting guidelines" for the media, which included this particular point: When interviewing representatives of racist organisations or reporting meetings or statements or claims, journalists should carefully check all reports for accuracy and seek rebutting or opposing comments. The antisocial nature of such views should be exposed. Does anyone think reporter Debbie Randle stuck to those (voluntary) guidelines, or even to basic common sense (i.e. if you're interviewing young members of a racist party, those members' views should be challenged and their racism exposed)? According to her profile on the BBC website, she is a "Senior Broadcast Journalist" and someone desperate to interview Prince William, who once wanted to be a singer, cites Jon Snow as her favourite "reporter" because "he's so cool" and had a first job working in a bingo club. Judging by this abysmal interview, and the pass she gives the odious BNP and its "young" members, she should probably head back to that bingo club while her Radio 1 bosses hang their heads in shame for commissioning this awful feature. The normalisation of the BNP in our political and media discourse continues apace - aided and abetted, as usual, by our public-service broadcaster. It's disgusting and depressing. › Brown's Fleet Street friends Mehdi Hasan is a contributing writer for the New Statesman and the co-author of Ed: The Milibands and the Making of a Labour Leader. He was the New Statesman's senior editor (politics) from 2009-12. Subscribe For more great writing from our award-winning journalists subscribe for just £1 per month!