Glosswitch is a feminist mother of three who works in publishing.
In our family, it has given us a small taste of how different things could be if the division between home and workplace were to become more fluid.
Reproductive technology – like that used by the footballer to have children – is not a progressive solution to the way childbearing subjugates women.
When men make statements about breastfeeding, they are making assumptions about where and to whom a woman should direct her energies, with no consideration of the personal cost.
There must be a middle ground between finding menstruation disgusting and finding it self-defining, politically impressive or worth spending half your salary on. It’s just a period. It’s normal.
The far more revolutionary campaign, of course, would be one that wanted boys to be allowed to wear skirts, too.
But why on earth would they want to?
Liberal feminism has painted itself into a corner from which it is very hard to launch a coherent critique of surrogacy.
Birth is painful, frightening and unpredictable, and it is also highly politicised.
It’s not just a case of goodies and baddies, those who get it and those who don’t.
The more men changing nappies, the better, but let’s not kid ourselves that it will liberate women from caring responsibilities.
We notice you have ad blocking software enabled. Support the New Statesman’s quality, independent journalism by contributing now — and this message will disappear for the next 30 days.
If we cannot support the site on advertising revenue, we will have to introduce a pay wall — meaning fewer readers will have access to our incisive analysis, comprehensive culture coverage and groundbreaking long reads.