Leader: Netanyahu risks condemning Israel to perpetual war
Despite the latest ceasefire, there is no way clear to peace. And there is no military solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
By New Statesman Published 21 November 2012 18:43
In the days following Israel’s assassination of the Hamas military commander Ahmed al-Jabari, history appeared to be repeating itself in the Middle East. As in 2008, when Operation Cast Lead was launched, Israel seemed poised to mount a ground invasion of the Gaza Strip, with huge civilian casualties certain to result. The Israeli interior minister, Eliyahu Yishai, spoke of sending Gaza “back to the Middle Ages”. No less chillingly, Hamas’s armed wing, the al-Qassam Brigades, served notice of its intention to resume suicide bombings in Israel. “We’ve missed the suicide attacks. Expect us soon at bus stations and in cafés,” it declared in a propaganda video. That, at the time of going to press, both sides have pulled back from the brink is due largely to the efforts of the Egyptian president, Mohammed Morsi, who has shown himself to be a pragmatic figure capable of exerting leverage over both Israel and Hamas.
The past week’s events have proved, once again, that there is no military solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The acknowledgement that Israel has the right to defend itself should not preclude criticism of its actions. As the former foreign secretary David Miliband has observed: “Self-defence is not the same as smart defence.” Rather than weakening Hamas, the assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 135 Palestinians, an estimated half of them civilians, has strengthened it. The Islamist group has enhanced its claim to be the pre-eminent defender of the Palestinian cause. At the same time, the attacks have further marginalised the Palestinian Authority, Israel’s ostensible negotiating partner, which has been reduced to the role of a helpless bystander.
That there have been mercifully few Israeli casualties has more to do with Hamas’s limited weaponry and Israel’s Iron Dome missile defence system than it does with any restraint on the Palestinian group’s part. Yet although nothing justifies the rocket attacks on Israel, one cannot ignore the context in which they take place. Since Hamas assumed administrative control of Gaza in 2006, Israel has maintained a draconian and illegal blockade of the strip which has immiserated its 1.7 million residents, 80 per cent of whom are dependent on humanitarian aid.
It was no coincidence that Operation Pillar of Defence was launched as the Palestinians prepared to seek observer status at the United Nations through a vote in the General Assembly on 29 November. Avigdor Lieberman – the Israeli foreign minister and leader of the ultra-nationalist Yisrael Beiteinu, which has recently merged with Likud, the party led by the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu – has claimed that the Palestinians will be “destroying the chances of peace talks” if they pursue their campaign for UN recognition.
Yet, through its own actions, Israel has already come close to doing so. In defiance of the UN, the US and the EU, the Likud-led government has continued to expand settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, to the point where there are now more than 550,000 settlers, controlling 42 per cent of the land and representing nearly 10 per cent of the Israeli Jewish population. With every new settlement that is constructed, the possibility of a viable Palestinian state recedes further.
Mr Netanyahu will use the strength of Hamas, which does not recognise Israel, and the weakness of the Palestinian Authority, which does, to argue that he has no “partner for peace”. He would be careless to do so. Israel’s ultimate security depends on the establishment of a Palestinian state, based on the 1967 borders and with East Jerusalem as its capital, and a just settlement for refugees. Should Mr Netanyahu continue to obstruct any progress towards this goal, he will condemn his country to perpetual war.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















35 comments
THE WAR WORKED....no more rockets, Hamas heavily weakened.
"An estimated 800 died under Assad during the same eight days of what Israel called Operation Pillar of Defence. But, for some reason, the loss of those lives failed to touch the activists who so rapidly organised the demos and student sit-ins against Israel. "
Hamas is a resistance organisation defending Palestinians from the brutality of israel
It is iniquitous that a group of fanatically religious Jewish people should be allowed to walk in and take over the country of Palestine merely because Hitler killed 6 million of them - and because of a claim that they were there over 2,000 years ago. They have rebuilt a fictional David's city which never ever existed in the first place - nor did the fictional David. The United States have been the willing co-murderers in this disgraceful venture
Visit Isreal you’ll be confronted by synagogues, mosques and churches, by Jews and Arabs living together, by minorities playing huge parts in all areas of Israeli life, from the military to the judiciary. It was eye-opening for me. This wasn't the evil Zionist Israel that I had been told about. Personally, I think "Palestine" is a fantasy state, impossible to create now, because of the Palestinians disastrous embrace of the death cult of extreme radical Islam.
The Israelis are engaged in a strategy quite analogous to the one the western powers used so effectively against the USSR during the cold war. A "containment strategy". An outright war of annihilation and ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians would be immoral and the Jews have no stomach for such brutality. Hence they are obliged to play for time and wait for the Arabs to defeat themselves. As with the defeat of communism, this outcome is inevitable because, quite frankly, the Arabs are in their final decadence and they have not contributed anything of value for generations and they are not really able to deal with modern realities. Islamic movements like the Muslim brothers, Hamas and Hezbollah seem impressive but they are certainly not the answer and will vanish in due course. As for the more moderate Palestinian factions, they will someday evolve into something important but presently they are rejected by a majority of their own people and are thus too weak to conclude an meaningful peace treaty or to administer a state. Hence no short term solution is available and containment is the only viable and moral option. As was the case with the cold war, the containment approach leads to a long protracted struggle. There will be flair-ups of violence and setbacks and at times progress will be difficult to discern. Through all this the Jews must keep their eyes on the long term and stay resolute as they have already done for 2000 years. They have already won possession of their beloved homeland and of their eternal capital. The main battle is already concluded after untold sacrifice and now certainly is not the time for defeatism or to lose strategic patience. The current Gaza episode is a small victory because it forces the Arabs to confront their own internal problems and contradictions. Yet it is also minor in the larger scheme of things. The Arabs cannot forever subsist on a diet of hatred and vengeance and death. In the end they will need to get on with the business of life and they will come to terms both with the Jews and with the Jewish state.
Just one question - how was the State of Israel created? Oh yes throu but rather gh an illegal and immoral occupation. Why then is it so surprising that it is not recognised as a state an invader?
The latest truce, after eight days of fighting and more than a hundred lives lost, appears fragile and superficial. The leaders may agree to stop the bloodshed temporary under coercion, but grass-root supporters may not. It only needs one rocket to fly over the border to rekindle the fire. (vzc1943, ttm1943)
"Perpetual war" will be the longest war ever fought; the Eighty Years War had nothing on it.
I admit to having been surprised Israel agreed to a ceasefire. But maybe they were just trying out their anti-rocket defense shield--which seemed to work okay.
It should instil confidence for the remainder of the perpetual war.
no real surprise, the US told them to stop. and Netanyahu for all his bravery knows who ultimately is in charge.
'Methinks the game us up!' Israel is now a cafe society not the hungry settler community of the forties to the seventies.
Some of its own citizens suddenly realize they are surrounded on all sides by enemies. Hamas's tin can rocketry was very hit or miss but the Iron Dome defence is prohibitively expensive.
Should Hamas and its allies get hold of even 1950s missiles and fire them in barrages no defence system will cope with the numbers.
What was it the Nazis called 'living space'.
Negotiate while you have the chance.
One-way bet
Dear Hugh, I hate to break this to you but Israel didn't even use one quarter of 1% of its military strength against the islamofascists of Hamas. Had your Islamist friends inflicted serious loss of civilian life in Israel, Gaza today would have as much life in it as an ashtray.
The western left studiously ignores Hamas's genocidal anti semitism, which it is entirely open about, the hundreds, possibly thousands of Fatah officials who have been murdered by them in their fratricidal takeover of the West Bank from the previous PLO regime, the awe inspiring levels of corruption over the decades in the PLO: as their people starved, Arafat's wife and the others senior members mistresses were all shopping at Harrods and salting away millions in aid money in their Swiss banks - which was one of the reasons for the rise of the - at least non corrupt - Hamas - the thousands of Palestinians killed in internal blood letting, the intimidation and opression of Palestinian Christians, almost all of whom have left the West Bank, terrified of Hamas taking over there too. We have seen the six men shot dead in the street without any semblence of a trial, as Israeli spies. Maybe they were spies: more likely they were people who were shot because they had incurred the wrath of the local Hamas Islamoloonies for some minor infraction of Sharia law, or becasue of some personal grudge.
Nobody at the NS seems to give a damn about Arab on Arab massacres. Assad has probably killed 40,000 of his people in the last two years, and his dad killed about the same number back in 82: no demonstrations, no hand wringing editorials from the NS no appalled articles by Pilgerfiskchomsky, just silence.
Either Israel has the right to exist or it does not. If it does not, then come out and say it, and also explain where the six million ethnically cleansed Jews should then go to. If it does have the right to exist, then like all states, it has the right to defend itself. If Israel lifts the blockade on concrete and building materials, Hamas will exploit this to build missile bunkers. If they allow petrol in, Hamas will use this to fuel rockets. If they allow financial aid to get through, Hamas will use this to buy weapons: or maybe follow the PLO's example and line their own pockets. Or both. If Hamas ever gets hold of nuclear capability, Israel will cease to exist.
The jews know something about genocide. Having been on the receiving end, they are now dishing it out. Colonies (& "Israel" is an American colony in Palestine - the Americans stopped the British stamping it out) succeed when either the inhabitants absorb the colonists e.g Latin America or the by genocide by the colonists, e.g. USA & Australia
I gather the Israelis have an expensive missile defence system in place to shoot down incoming Palestinian rockets and that this (as well as superior Israeli weaponry) accounts for the discrepancy in numbers killed on the two sides. If the UN were to install an equal missile defence system on Palestinian territory to shoot down incoming Israeli rockets this would not only save lives, but also help to equalise the balance of military power. It would bring the Israelis to the negotiating table more quickly and with a greater sense of urgency.
I sincerely doubt it Jane. You are trying to draw moral equivalence between a Hamas, a terrorist organisation that has no qualms about targetting civilians and is dedicated to the elimination of Jews as part of its DNA, and Israel, the victim here.
Of, please! ! I'm no supporter of Hamas, and they have plenty to answer for, but so does Israel. Hamas was elected, but Israel and the USA don't like Hamas, so they declared it a terrorist organization so they wouldn't have to negotiate. Israel's policies are aimed at the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Israel's "victim" card doesn't play any more. The Holocaust is no excuse for the state terrorism and racism that Israel is inflicting on the Palestinian people. Enough.
Hamas has been declared a terrorist organization long before they won elections in Gaza. In fact I beleive they were so designated by the US state department in April of 1993. The reason was a rather grizzly series of suicide bombings.
The Hamas Charter (or Covenant), issued in 1988, outlined the organization's position on many issues at the time, identifies Hamas as the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine and declares its members to be Muslims who "fear God and raise the banner of Jihad in the face of the oppressors." The charter states "our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious" and calls for the eventual creation of an Islamic state in Palestine, in place of Israel and the Palestinian Territories, and the obliteration or dissolution of Israel. The Charter also asserts that through shrewd manipulation of imperial countries and secret societies, Zionists were behind a wide range of events and disasters going as far back in history as the French Revolution. Among the charter's controversial statements is the following: "The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews [and kill them]; until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: Oh Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!" The document also quotes Islamic religious texts to provide justification for fighting against and killing the Jews of Israel, presenting the Arab-Israeli conflict as an inherently irreconcilable struggle between Jews and Muslims, and Judaism and Islam, adding that the only way to engage in this struggle between "truth and falsehood" is through Islam and by means of jihad, until victory or martyrdom. The Charter adds that "renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion" of Islam. The charter states that Hamas is humanistic, and tolerant of other religions as long as they do not block Hamas's efforts
Pot calling the kettle black? You were the one that has brought up the Holocaust. Which many of co-religionists deny btw.
Two factors seem to preclude a solution; 1) the Israeli´s want palestinian land and especially it´s water and 2) the Israeli wish that Israel be a jewish state. Given a democratic one person one vote solution, the Israeli´s would have access to both land and water but could not have an exclusively jewish state. To have an exclusively Jewish state, the Israeli´s must drive out the Palestinians to get the land and water. This latter seems to be the Israeli policy and strategy.
The war has been going on for 1300 years, and is continualy spoken about within English Media by experts from anywhere but Britain.
Everybody is so sanctimonious in here; the fact is that Jews & Palestinian Arabs have converted a war for land into a war for God/Allah.
There is no way out when people fight for the supremacy of their gods. Hamas is defending the empire which was bestowed upon them by Umar, the second Caliphate. The settlers since 1967 are reconquering the land of Abraham.
Where is the room for compromise? Unless both parties utterly exhausted themselves with the killing; war will be part of the process for a very long time yet.
Nonsense. The isn't a religious war. This is a war over land and water. Anywhere else in the world, what Israel is doing is known as ethnic cleansing.
The Hamas Charter (or Covenant), issued in 1988, outlined the organization's position on many issues at the time, identifies Hamas as the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine and declares its members to be Muslims who "fear God and raise the banner of Jihad in the face of the oppressors." The charter states "our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious" and calls for the eventual creation of an Islamic state in Palestine, in place of Israel and the Palestinian Territories, and the obliteration or dissolution of Israel. The Charter also asserts that through shrewd manipulation of imperial countries and secret societies, Zionists were behind a wide range of events and disasters going as far back in history as the French Revolution. The document also quotes Islamic religious texts to provide justification for fighting against and killing the Jews of Israel, presenting the Arab-Israeli conflict as an inherently irreconcilable struggle between Jews and Muslims, and Judaism and Islam, adding that the only way to engage in this struggle between "truth and falsehood" is through Islam and by means of jihad, until victory or martyrdom.
What Tosh, apologizing for the rockets attacks, so funny if it wasnt so serious. Of course Israel had to blockade Gaza, can you imagine what what have happend if these same Terrorist were allowed free reign??? Also the suggestion that the can fire as many Rockets at you, make your life hell, but if you should respond with Military action you'll become the aggressor.
Hamas are not now, and have never been a partner for peace, they are Iran's puppet and have no other strategy than to use Terror for some kind of goal .
'Julia Harris' full time occupation - serial hater
Israel is not now, and never has been nor intended to be a partner for peace with the Palestinians, going relentlessly about their, Israel's, own goals; they are the puppet of the US, or actually the other way round, and can use no other strategy but overwhelming Terror and carnage on the natives.
Excuse me, rubbish, in 1948 Israel accepted the 2 state solution, the Arabs did not, post 67 Israel gave back the whole Sinai and other land for peace, it has made many concessions over the years for peace but gets it thrown back in its face by Genocidal Arabs.
Its funny how in Egypt one of the first things in there so called Arab spring was to break the peace treaty with Israel as the hate the Arabs feel for Jews has nothing to do with land, but everything to do with sadistic madmen who hate Jews as setout in there holy book.
Indeed, Julia. Tonight we hear that the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, the real leader of Hamas has made some very anti-Morsi noises. I guess Morsi is not going to t conference in Pakistan because he knows there could be a coup while he is there.
But in the longer term Sharia will be the new constitution in Egypt.
@Jankaas
Are you truly serious? What on earth makes you think Britain has the ability to "sort this out for them?" Unfortunately this has been the hypocritical attitude of the British government for a long time. Did they sort Iraq out? Did they sort Afghanistan out? Did they sort N. Ireland out? Of course not. They consistently worsen the situation with their self-righteous interventions, murdering many innocent people (none of which is reported in the British media) along the way.
yes i was being serious, but i doubt you actually read what i wrote. i never said "Britain" has to sort this out. what i wrote was;
"2) we invade and occupy both territories with a Coalition of the Sane, and force the 2 State solution upon them."
a Coalition can go in heavily armed and force the 2 State solution the whole world desires. it would be good for the Israeli's, good for the Palestinians, the Middle East, in fact the entire world would gain from this.
what's your bright idea then Strawberry?
Dear NS Editorial writer,
You views on what Israel should or should not do would have carried more weight if at the top of the page you would have carried a photo of an Israeli victim too. Would that be too much to ask?
So why didn't you do so? What was the thought process that led you to be so one-sided and provocative? Is there something in your DNA that prevents you from really seeing the 'mercifully few' Israeli victims as human beings? If you want to win hearts of minds and want your audience to listen to you, then stop being so contemptuous of the Israeli civilians who have suffered in this war. A picture is more important than all the words you write.
That said, much of your editorial was spot on.
Perhaps because there has been a vastly disproportionate number of Palestinian civilians killed and wounded?
I think the choice of photo is excellent, and restrained, given the horrors of what civilians are enduring in Gaza, and from which they cannot escape.
Hi JG,
What ratio of killed and wounded would be acceptable to you? 200, 400. 1000 Israelis? Is this a race to see who can kill and maim more?
the choice seems ever so clear;
1) we either allow this disaster to continue between 2 dysfunctional societies, both of whom have sticks to beat each other with, and plenty of reasons to do so.
2) we invade and occupy both territories with a Coalition of the Sane, and force the 2 State solution upon them.
it's an absolute waste of time and energy to think that Israel and/or the Palestinians can sort this out, they have totally lost the plot. it's high time we took over and sort this out for them.
How true.