Registered user login:

India's difficult balancing act

Aditi Charanji

Published 29 February 2008

How do you maintain India's impressive growth while ensuring that the country's rural poor get a share of the new wealth?

When Indian Finance Minister, P. Chidambaram, stood up in Parliament on 29 February to read out India's annual Union budget he did so in the knowledge it could be his last chance to address a fundamental problem.

For this is the Congress-led coalition United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government's last budget ahead of the 2009 general election. It is crucially important for Chidambaram to be able to pull off the tricky balancing act of maintaining high-level growth on the one hand, and attempting to gain electoral support through populist give-aways on the other.

It's people like Ramesh Prasad whom the minister has to appease. Ramesh is a labourer in New Delhi. He makes between 100 – 150 rupees (£1.25 – 1.85) a day and is struggling to cope. His two biggest problems are rising prices of essential goods like food and fuel, and the competition caused by the influx of people like him who have moved from rural areas into the city to seek employment. “There's nothing for them in the villages. And when they come here, they can't even afford food,” he says sadly.

For the last three years, India's economy has been growing at over nine percent a year and the urban middle class has been reaping the benefits. At the same time, almost 80 per cent of the billion-plus population survives on 20 rupees (25p) or less a day.

Most of the economy's growth has come from the booming services sector, while agriculture is barely expanding with growth between two or three per cent.

About two-thirds of India's population depends on agriculture either directly or indirectly, and the government has been repeatedly criticised for not taking enough measures to tackle the what is being called “an agrarian crisis”. The Economic Survey on February 28 has warned the government that any slowdown in the already fluctuating agricultural sector is not only detrimental for the people that depend on it, but will also hurt the economy's growth.

This is why the budget is widely seen as the last chance for the Congress Party to redeem itself in the eyes of rural voters after being defeated in a number of provincial elections last year – including Uttar Pradesh, the country's largest and most politically important state. “I didn't vote for the Congress,” says Pappu, a landless tiller whose income depends completely on agriculture. “They have done nothing for me”.

Chidambaram is expected to announce higher budgetary allocations for sensitive areas like agriculture, education and health. And, following a spate of farmer suicides across the country last year thanks to an inability to repay loans, sources say the chances of a loan waiver for small farmers is almost a certainty.

Both Ramesh and Pappu are sceptical. They say that the government announces new plans for them every year, but nothing changes. “Prices keep rising, and we can't keep up anymore, “ says Ramesh. “Every government promises us that life will get better – it never does.”

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

LordandMaster
29 February 2008 at 11:39

As anticipated by the writer the loan waiver arrived. On cue, bringing with it temporary relief, but frustration for every farmer that did repay his debt, every bank that has lost interest income and agro sector in general which is likely to expect this as routine.

The writer quite correctly highlights the need of the hour. But answers do not lie in anti-free market measures to control inflation, but in addressing the needs of the rural poor through Co-Operative farming, better distribution and storage and controls on import. I wonder if the writer feels that Chidambram has balanced things well, the stock market seems unsure

nawawimohamad
02 March 2008 at 04:07

India must eradicate corruption, then only she can eradicate poverty. In India, anything that runs legally will run very-very slowly and at times runs to a full stop.But those running in parallel illegally with corruption runs very fast and ever smoothly.

Because of corruption, India is not able to contribute anything substantial to the world, instead the world has to contribute to its needy. Shame on India.

gnuneo
03 March 2008 at 18:00

look to Amartya Sen, and the relatively stable State of Kerala for the answers.

unfortunately, such answers also massively cut down on corruption and graft - so are unlikely to be implemented on a wide scale.

LordandMaster is correct.

stanlee
08 March 2008 at 16:39

The ideological commitment of the Indian ruling class nto the neoliberal economic policies prevents them from taking any concrete step for the majority of the poor rural population of this country. As many have witnessed duling the past couple of weeks, the booming corporate sector or the New India, which holds a veto over almost all the policy issues, is very critical of the govvernment's loan waiver scheme, which according to many economists, is nothing more than tokenism. If you want a change at the grassroot level, you need to have changes in the policies. The ruling class seems to be committed to the further development of the New India, which houses 20 percent of the population. What about the rest, Mr. Prime Minister? That's what we are asking here. He's talking of "inclussive growth". Does it mean that all the corporate houses would be included in the growth process?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Are your savings now safe?