Why Cuba is a beacon

Some argue the revolution has not gone far enough in terms of a thoroughgoing democracy based but it

There can be no dispute that Fidel Castro’s coming to power in Cuba in 1959 was a progressive revolution – heroically led by Castro and his allies. It replaced a barbaric regime under Batista in which the island economy served the US business elite and mafia. The 26th July movement, led by Castro and Che Guevara, swept to power on a wave of popular support.

Neither can there be any dispute that there have been immense achievements in terms of healthcare, poverty reduction and education. As a poor country, Cuba now has levels of healthcare that rival some of the wealthiest countries in the world and exports its doctors across Latin America and other parts of the developing world – with over 20,000 Cuban doctors working abroad – demonstrating the internationalism of the revolution.

These achievements have been made in the most arduous circumstances – with the US embargo, invasions, acts of sabotage, assassination attempts and threats that have kept the country in a state of permanent siege.

This has almost inevitably meant a more tightly controlled society – but unlike Stalin’s Russia there have never been any Cuban gulags. The one camp in Cuba that holds political prisoners without charge or hope of a fair trial is in Guantanamo Bay – an illegally occupied part of Cuba, in which the US still holds hundreds. It is an irony that some may criticise Castro, yet forget that many countries the UK government cosies up to – from the US and Israel to Saudi Arabia and China – commit grotesque human rights abuses with barely a peep from the Government or media.

Some argue that the revolution has not yet gone far enough in terms of a thoroughgoing democracy based upon fundamental civil rights, but this revolution is a work in progress. The transfer of wealth and power from a corrupt elite to a situation in which every Cuban has the right to free healthcare and education, to secure housing, to subsidised food and travel is a massive advance in social rights. Unlike many Latin American countries, abortion in Cuba is free on demand, and maternity leave is one year on full pay.

Cuba’s achievements have also been phenomenal in democratising access to sport and the arts – the reason Cuba excels in these fields is because everyone is encouraged to develop their talents all regardless of wealth.

People rightly ask could the Cuban revolution have gone further? Of course, and undoubtedly will in a new climate in Latin America where popularly elected leaders such as Chavez in Venezuela and Morales in Bolivia have bolstered the regional forces in support of socialism.

With the potential of change in Washington too, there is an opportunity for the US to reject its outdated Cold War policy towards Cuba. There is a role for the UK and European partners to mediate a new relationship between the US, Cuba and Europe.

This must not be done in a patronising way but recognising that when it comes to creating a more equal, a more environmentally sustainable, and a more engaged society, we can learn a lot from Cuba and Castro’s achievements.

Cuba serves as a beacon to many socialists because it shows in the most difficult circumstances – isolated, bullied and victimised – what can be done in a society where people’s living standards are put above the rights of a few to be filthy rich. Next time you hear a UK politician tell you that free prescriptions, free care for the elderly, free university education is all unaffordable – ask them how a poor tiny island nation can manage it, yet the fifth richest country in the world can’t.

John McDonnell MP is Chair of the Labour Representation Committee (www.l-r-c.org.uk) and author of Another World is Possible – a manifesto for 21st century socialism

22 comments

genecrabtree920's picture

I wasnt just calling people stupid. I was analysing their arguements, showing that theyre stupid. All youve done is come along and say "anyone who calls someone stupid is stupid. Thats why youre stupid, antileft." Well, can you see the loop there? If youre saying that Im stupid, and that if you say someones stupid then you must be stupid, then theres a slight problem with your logic. Because, you see, that means youre stupid. And as someone who doesnt think that saying someone is stupid makes you stupid, I think you must be pretty stupid for making that error.

Robert Powell's picture

So anyway the mistake people on the left have often made about Fidel is neatly summed up by George Orwell - two legs good, four legs bad. There's no doubt that the scope of US human rights violations is miles greater than Fidel's - either directly in Guantanamo or by supporting the outrageous regimes they do be it Pinochet's in the past or Saudi Arabia's now. But that doesn't meant dear old Fidel has the right to eschew Cuban citizens' rights. I think there's a lot to be said for the rich consuming a bit less if it contributes to the overall good of the nation but if you have the strength of your convictions and your policies are working why do you have to lock people up? No you just shoot them.

Pencils's picture

Very good article by McDonnell. Unfortunately, its' generated a lot of spam here. Does anyone still seriously believe that the US or UK are democracies? McDonnell's final point was a crucial one - Cuba's health and education achievements not only show up the claims that we can't afford these things anymore here, but also that our NHS couldn't run without immigrant labour, that we need to deprive poor countries of the medical staff THEY have paid to train. Cuba manages to achieve a better health outcome for its people than the USA, and it EXPORTS doctors and nurses to other poor countries.
Cuba has a far more effective democracy than us. Read Isaac Saney's 'Cuba: a revolution in motion' for a good, readable introduction to Cuban democracy; I caught hints in the above that McDonnell has been reading this.

Colonel Blimp's picture

I agree with Mr Powell and not for the first time. Shooting people never hurt anyone.

genecrabtree920's picture

"Cuba has a far more effective democracy than us."
Well, it is hard to imagine Gordon Brown being in charge for 49 years is it? Would you like to see that, pencils? Surely, the fact that you cant choose to vote out the ruling party, and that the ruling party unquestioningly always picks the same leader, for 49 years, is a sign that perhaps the democracy isnt that good? Pencils, tell me this- if the UK introduced a law which said "no member of the press is allowed to criticise the government, or indeed report statistics which may make the government look bad", would you support it?

pacienciaedwards's picture

Antileft, your name sort of gives it away that you're likely to be biased. And the arguments you're consequently having with other contributors illuminate an interesting point really because at the end of the day, a discussion about Cuba is always going to come down to warring ideologies. Those in certain camps on the left are going to say that the eradication of extremes of inequality frees people and whilst the leader stays the same, the sort of local control in Cuba represents true democracy (Saney's book is indeed illuminating here, Pencils). Those more conventional in their views are likely to say that the lack of full democratic elections leading to the perpetuation of one-party rule represents tyrannical dictatorship. A lot of the time it comes down to basic interpretations of terms such as 'freedom' and 'democracy', clearly those who support Castro have very different views of these ideas from most of those in the West. It's not surprising then that the media and mainstream opinion in the West is so against Cuba, because these core values are so ingrained and never get debated. It's important to recognise that Cuba is not perfect, and is certainly no socialist utopia, but too often Cuba is judged by Western values, and this is why the massive achievements they have made are dismissed with an overused and rather impetuous shout of 'dictator!'.

Bastiat's picture

I feel one overpowering emotion as I read this story: rage. I have one simple question for the author. How DARE you, sir? Allow me to innoculate this pretty nonsense with a dose of ugly truth:

http://www.fiu.edu/~fcf/castro_year1/castroyr1.ruleoflaw.html

http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/cuba/Cuba996-01.htm

"Cuban authorities continue to treat as criminal offenses nonviolent activities such as meeting to discuss the economy or elections, writing letters to the government, reporting on political or economic developments, speaking to international reporters, or advocating the release of political prisoners."

Bastiat's picture

Cuba's much-praised socialized medical care is merely a case of more lies to expose:

http://www.canf.org/Issues/medicalapartheid.htm

http://ctp.iccas.miami.edu/website_documents/Article-Hirschfeld-Press.pdf

Robert Powell's picture

Hmm cultural relativism Mr Kenyon. You're on dodgy ground there. Some things are absolute like not imprisoning people because of political disagreement when they have committed no crime. Complete Bastiat, I had an overpowering emotion as I read your comments - fortunately I have bin under my desk.

Tatiana's picture

Good for you Bastiat!!!

Latest tweets