Registered user login:

Why Cuba is a beacon

John McDonnell

Published 19 February 2008

Some argue the revolution has not gone far enough in terms of a thoroughgoing democracy based but it's a work in progress, writes Labour's John McDonnell

There can be no dispute that Fidel Castro’s coming to power in Cuba in 1959 was a progressive revolution – heroically led by Castro and his allies. It replaced a barbaric regime under Batista in which the island economy served the US business elite and mafia. The 26th July movement, led by Castro and Che Guevara, swept to power on a wave of popular support.

Neither can there be any dispute that there have been immense achievements in terms of healthcare, poverty reduction and education. As a poor country, Cuba now has levels of healthcare that rival some of the wealthiest countries in the world and exports its doctors across Latin America and other parts of the developing world – with over 20,000 Cuban doctors working abroad – demonstrating the internationalism of the revolution.

These achievements have been made in the most arduous circumstances – with the US embargo, invasions, acts of sabotage, assassination attempts and threats that have kept the country in a state of permanent siege.

This has almost inevitably meant a more tightly controlled society – but unlike Stalin’s Russia there have never been any Cuban gulags. The one camp in Cuba that holds political prisoners without charge or hope of a fair trial is in Guantanamo Bay – an illegally occupied part of Cuba, in which the US still holds hundreds. It is an irony that some may criticise Castro, yet forget that many countries the UK government cosies up to – from the US and Israel to Saudi Arabia and China – commit grotesque human rights abuses with barely a peep from the Government or media.

Some argue that the revolution has not yet gone far enough in terms of a thoroughgoing democracy based upon fundamental civil rights, but this revolution is a work in progress. The transfer of wealth and power from a corrupt elite to a situation in which every Cuban has the right to free healthcare and education, to secure housing, to subsidised food and travel is a massive advance in social rights. Unlike many Latin American countries, abortion in Cuba is free on demand, and maternity leave is one year on full pay.

Cuba’s achievements have also been phenomenal in democratising access to sport and the arts – the reason Cuba excels in these fields is because everyone is encouraged to develop their talents all regardless of wealth.

People rightly ask could the Cuban revolution have gone further? Of course, and undoubtedly will in a new climate in Latin America where popularly elected leaders such as Chavez in Venezuela and Morales in Bolivia have bolstered the regional forces in support of socialism.

With the potential of change in Washington too, there is an opportunity for the US to reject its outdated Cold War policy towards Cuba. There is a role for the UK and European partners to mediate a new relationship between the US, Cuba and Europe.

This must not be done in a patronising way but recognising that when it comes to creating a more equal, a more environmentally sustainable, and a more engaged society, we can learn a lot from Cuba and Castro’s achievements.

Cuba serves as a beacon to many socialists because it shows in the most difficult circumstances – isolated, bullied and victimised – what can be done in a society where people’s living standards are put above the rights of a few to be filthy rich. Next time you hear a UK politician tell you that free prescriptions, free care for the elderly, free university education is all unaffordable – ask them how a poor tiny island nation can manage it, yet the fifth richest country in the world can’t.

John McDonnell MP is Chair of the Labour Representation Committee (www.l-r-c.org.uk) and author of Another World is Possible – a manifesto for 21st century socialism

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

22 comments from readers

Riaz Ahmad
19 February 2008 at 21:43

No matter how biased a right wing mind, you can never take away greatness from Castro. Providing the basics to the poor against all the odds, bullying, embargos, threats, invasions, assination attempts, prepoganda and disinformation. It is astounding that those in USA who believe in democracy stooped so low, yet failed so miserably. David and Goliath saga isn't it?

Tatiana
19 February 2008 at 22:15

Cuba was never a "poor country" (it is a poor country NOW). Cuba was a free country, people could go in and out of the country with no problems. Castro regime destroyed everything that took years to build. He is a murderer, a gangster in disguise, a demagogue, the most cruel dictator. What a shame that so much ignorance could lead people to say so many stupidities.

antileft
20 February 2008 at 03:37

One second- you seem to have missed out one tiny tiny fact in your very slightly one-sided article- you forgot to mention that Castro has been in power for 49 years. Just think about what that must be like for a few seconds.

"Unlike many Latin American countries, abortion in Cuba is free on demand, and maternity leave is one year on full pay."

You also forgot to mention that one year of full pay adds up to the stunningly generous sum of around 250 dollars.

You know, if you wrote an article like this in Cuba, praising America and saying how much Cuba could learn from them, do you know what would happen? Youd be put in a mental institution. That's why the writer of this article is a bloody idiot and should know better.

alanm
20 February 2008 at 09:30

It's difficult to know the exact truth about Cuba from the outside, but there's no doubt that Castro has admirably defied US bullying over forty years, which surely should be commended in itself. If indeed, as John McDonnell suggests, Castro has managed to create a true socialist state based on merit rather than heredity, this too should be applauded. The associated tyrannies of his reign have presumably been leaked through our largely right wing western media - which is not to say it is totally untrue, but one does begin to wonder if we're only being given half the truth about things there. If McDonnell's description of Cuba's social conditions is true, then the country is indeed a beacon of some kind of enlightenment we are deprived of in the US-sucking UK, albeit one imposed; but then we in the UK have things imposed on us all the time (unequal taxes, privatization, smoking bans and so on), none of which adds up to any kind of redistribution or social fairness. One does begin to wonder which country would be better to live in - on what McDonnell is saying, it sounds like Cuba to me.

nawawimohamad
20 February 2008 at 10:03

Cuba is an independent sovereign nation and this is a free world. Cuba has not intimidated, interfered or imposed its ideology onto other countries like what the US has done and continue doing. Cuba has not invaded other countries and has not created terrorist organizations like what the US has done.Cubans lived within their own standard of living and within their means. So leave Cuba alone and let their own people to decide on the future of their country. But after saying that will UK be able to cater for a disaster like Katrina?

antileft
20 February 2008 at 10:07

Oh dear alanm. Not too bright, are ya?

"there's no doubt that Castro has admirably defied US bullying over forty years, which surely should be commended in itself."

Cant you see the problem? You think that being in power for 49 years is a good thing?! You think its in the best interest of the country?! Oh dear...

"Castro has managed to create a true socialist state based on merit rather than heredity"

Where did you get this from?! Pay is more or less equally tiny, with people who are politically active and pro-Castro doing better than those who arent. Its hardly meritocratic is it? And its hardly efficient. And then... After 49 years of Castro, who takes over? Castro II. What did you say about heredity??

"One does begin to wonder which country would be better to live in - on what McDonnell is saying, it sounds like Cuba to me."

Well, alanm, maybe you should go live there eh? Or is the fact that the new statesman, (including John Mcdonnell) is banned there enough to put you off?

antileft
20 February 2008 at 10:09

"Cuba has not intimidated, interfered or imposed its ideology onto other countries like what the US has done and continue doing"

Oh come on! You have no idea do you?! When the soviet union was sending castro money, he sent his troops all over the place. The only reason he stopped is because he doesnt have enough money.

Robert Powell
20 February 2008 at 11:04

In my experience those who accuse people of lying are often liars; those who accuse people of cheating are often cheats. Antileft is always accusing people of being stupid.

antileft
20 February 2008 at 11:18

Very logical reasoning Powell. Maybe you should try contributing to the debate in some way instead of poking at it feebly with an intellectual stick.

Robert Powell
20 February 2008 at 11:24

You think it contributes anything to call people you disagree with stupid? It doesn't it just lowers the tone dickface.

antileft
20 February 2008 at 11:31

I wasnt just calling people stupid. I was analysing their arguements, showing that theyre stupid. All youve done is come along and say "anyone who calls someone stupid is stupid. Thats why youre stupid, antileft." Well, can you see the loop there? If youre saying that Im stupid, and that if you say someones stupid then you must be stupid, then theres a slight problem with your logic. Because, you see, that means youre stupid. And as someone who doesnt think that saying someone is stupid makes you stupid, I think you must be pretty stupid for making that error.

Robert Powell
20 February 2008 at 11:38

So anyway the mistake people on the left have often made about Fidel is neatly summed up by George Orwell - two legs good, four legs bad. There's no doubt that the scope of US human rights violations is miles greater than Fidel's - either directly in Guantanamo or by supporting the outrageous regimes they do be it Pinochet's in the past or Saudi Arabia's now. But that doesn't meant dear old Fidel has the right to eschew Cuban citizens' rights. I think there's a lot to be said for the rich consuming a bit less if it contributes to the overall good of the nation but if you have the strength of your convictions and your policies are working why do you have to lock people up? No you just shoot them.

Pencils
20 February 2008 at 11:39

Very good article by McDonnell. Unfortunately, its' generated a lot of spam here. Does anyone still seriously believe that the US or UK are democracies? McDonnell's final point was a crucial one - Cuba's health and education achievements not only show up the claims that we can't afford these things anymore here, but also that our NHS couldn't run without immigrant labour, that we need to deprive poor countries of the medical staff THEY have paid to train. Cuba manages to achieve a better health outcome for its people than the USA, and it EXPORTS doctors and nurses to other poor countries.

Cuba has a far more effective democracy than us. Read Isaac Saney's 'Cuba: a revolution in motion' for a good, readable introduction to Cuban democracy; I caught hints in the above that McDonnell has been reading this.

Colonel Blimp
20 February 2008 at 11:41

I agree with Mr Powell and not for the first time. Shooting people never hurt anyone.

antileft
20 February 2008 at 11:49

"Cuba has a far more effective democracy than us."

Well, it is hard to imagine Gordon Brown being in charge for 49 years is it? Would you like to see that, pencils? Surely, the fact that you cant choose to vote out the ruling party, and that the ruling party unquestioningly always picks the same leader, for 49 years, is a sign that perhaps the democracy isnt that good? Pencils, tell me this- if the UK introduced a law which said "no member of the press is allowed to criticise the government, or indeed report statistics which may make the government look bad", would you support it?

RobKenyon
20 February 2008 at 15:13

Antileft, your name sort of gives it away that you're likely to be biased. And the arguments you're consequently having with other contributors illuminate an interesting point really because at the end of the day, a discussion about Cuba is always going to come down to warring ideologies. Those in certain camps on the left are going to say that the eradication of extremes of inequality frees people and whilst the leader stays the same, the sort of local control in Cuba represents true democracy (Saney's book is indeed illuminating here, Pencils). Those more conventional in their views are likely to say that the lack of full democratic elections leading to the perpetuation of one-party rule represents tyrannical dictatorship. A lot of the time it comes down to basic interpretations of terms such as 'freedom' and 'democracy', clearly those who support Castro have very different views of these ideas from most of those in the West. It's not surprising then that the media and mainstream opinion in the West is so against Cuba, because these core values are so ingrained and never get debated. It's important to recognise that Cuba is not perfect, and is certainly no socialist utopia, but too often Cuba is judged by Western values, and this is why the massive achievements they have made are dismissed with an overused and rather impetuous shout of 'dictator!'.

Bastiat
20 February 2008 at 15:59

I feel one overpowering emotion as I read this story: rage. I have one simple question for the author. How DARE you, sir? Allow me to innoculate this pretty nonsense with a dose of ugly truth:

http://www.fiu.edu/~fcf/castro_year1/castroyr1.ruleoflaw.htm...

http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/cuba/Cuba996-01.htm

"Cuban authorities continue to treat as criminal offenses nonviolent activities such as meeting to discuss the economy or elections, writing letters to the government, reporting on political or economic developments, speaking to international reporters, or advocating the release of political prisoners."

Bastiat
20 February 2008 at 16:16

Cuba's much-praised socialized medical care is merely a case of more lies to expose:

http://www.canf.org/Issues/medicalapartheid.htm

http://ctp.iccas.miami.edu/website_documents/Article-Hirschf...

Robert Powell
20 February 2008 at 17:15

Hmm cultural relativism Mr Kenyon. You're on dodgy ground there. Some things are absolute like not imprisoning people because of political disagreement when they have committed no crime. Complete Bastiat, I had an overpowering emotion as I read your comments - fortunately I have bin under my desk.

Tatiana
20 February 2008 at 22:21

Good for you Bastiat!!!

RobKenyon
21 February 2008 at 14:55

Mr. Powell, I agree there are absolutes that must be upheld, and as I stated Cuba is far from perfect in that it flouts some of those. The Cuban authorities should be brought to task on these 'anomalies' (a great Blair euphemism), just as America should for theirs, just as the Sudan should. I am certainly no Leninist class-warrior who believes that anything is permissible in the name of revolution. What I have a problem with is people saying Cuba is undemocratic and the people are not 'free'. These are debatable concepts, and in the absence of having these debates, and in focusing entirely on the undoubtable wrongs of Casto's regime, we unfairly dismiss the positive elements of a broadly progressive movement.

Stop Globalism
02 March 2008 at 14:42

Becoming a democracy would ruin Cuba. It would mean bowing to the US . In a democracy the State has to be populist in a shallow competition with other parties that lie and promise nonsensical bribes to the electorate. This is a waste of time and money - which comes from lobbies and corporations further deepening the potential for corruption and for not simply getting on with serving the public interest. Cuba is NOT BROKE so there is no need to fix it. And democracy is the last thing Cuba needs.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?