Why Cuba is a beacon
Some argue the revolution has not gone far enough in terms of a thoroughgoing democracy based but it
By John McDonnell Published 19 February 2008There can be no dispute that Fidel Castro’s coming to power in Cuba in 1959 was a progressive revolution – heroically led by Castro and his allies. It replaced a barbaric regime under Batista in which the island economy served the US business elite and mafia. The 26th July movement, led by Castro and Che Guevara, swept to power on a wave of popular support.
Neither can there be any dispute that there have been immense achievements in terms of healthcare, poverty reduction and education. As a poor country, Cuba now has levels of healthcare that rival some of the wealthiest countries in the world and exports its doctors across Latin America and other parts of the developing world – with over 20,000 Cuban doctors working abroad – demonstrating the internationalism of the revolution.
These achievements have been made in the most arduous circumstances – with the US embargo, invasions, acts of sabotage, assassination attempts and threats that have kept the country in a state of permanent siege.
This has almost inevitably meant a more tightly controlled society – but unlike Stalin’s Russia there have never been any Cuban gulags. The one camp in Cuba that holds political prisoners without charge or hope of a fair trial is in Guantanamo Bay – an illegally occupied part of Cuba, in which the US still holds hundreds. It is an irony that some may criticise Castro, yet forget that many countries the UK government cosies up to – from the US and Israel to Saudi Arabia and China – commit grotesque human rights abuses with barely a peep from the Government or media.
Some argue that the revolution has not yet gone far enough in terms of a thoroughgoing democracy based upon fundamental civil rights, but this revolution is a work in progress. The transfer of wealth and power from a corrupt elite to a situation in which every Cuban has the right to free healthcare and education, to secure housing, to subsidised food and travel is a massive advance in social rights. Unlike many Latin American countries, abortion in Cuba is free on demand, and maternity leave is one year on full pay.
Cuba’s achievements have also been phenomenal in democratising access to sport and the arts – the reason Cuba excels in these fields is because everyone is encouraged to develop their talents all regardless of wealth.
People rightly ask could the Cuban revolution have gone further? Of course, and undoubtedly will in a new climate in Latin America where popularly elected leaders such as Chavez in Venezuela and Morales in Bolivia have bolstered the regional forces in support of socialism.
With the potential of change in Washington too, there is an opportunity for the US to reject its outdated Cold War policy towards Cuba. There is a role for the UK and European partners to mediate a new relationship between the US, Cuba and Europe.
This must not be done in a patronising way but recognising that when it comes to creating a more equal, a more environmentally sustainable, and a more engaged society, we can learn a lot from Cuba and Castro’s achievements.
Cuba serves as a beacon to many socialists because it shows in the most difficult circumstances – isolated, bullied and victimised – what can be done in a society where people’s living standards are put above the rights of a few to be filthy rich. Next time you hear a UK politician tell you that free prescriptions, free care for the elderly, free university education is all unaffordable – ask them how a poor tiny island nation can manage it, yet the fifth richest country in the world can’t.
John McDonnell MP is Chair of the Labour Representation Committee (www.l-r-c.org.uk) and author of Another World is Possible – a manifesto for 21st century socialism
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


22 comments
No matter how biased a right wing mind, you can never take away greatness from Castro. Providing the basics to the poor against all the odds, bullying, embargos, threats, invasions, assination attempts, prepoganda and disinformation. It is astounding that those in USA who believe in democracy stooped so low, yet failed so miserably. David and Goliath saga isn't it?
Cuba was never a "poor country" (it is a poor country NOW). Cuba was a free country, people could go in and out of the country with no problems. Castro regime destroyed everything that took years to build. He is a murderer, a gangster in disguise, a demagogue, the most cruel dictator. What a shame that so much ignorance could lead people to say so many stupidities.
One second- you seem to have missed out one tiny tiny fact in your very slightly one-sided article- you forgot to mention that Castro has been in power for 49 years. Just think about what that must be like for a few seconds.
"Unlike many Latin American countries, abortion in Cuba is free on demand, and maternity leave is one year on full pay."
You also forgot to mention that one year of full pay adds up to the stunningly generous sum of around 250 dollars.
You know, if you wrote an article like this in Cuba, praising America and saying how much Cuba could learn from them, do you know what would happen? Youd be put in a mental institution. That's why the writer of this article is a bloody idiot and should know better.
It's difficult to know the exact truth about Cuba from the outside, but there's no doubt that Castro has admirably defied US bullying over forty years, which surely should be commended in itself. If indeed, as John McDonnell suggests, Castro has managed to create a true socialist state based on merit rather than heredity, this too should be applauded. The associated tyrannies of his reign have presumably been leaked through our largely right wing western media - which is not to say it is totally untrue, but one does begin to wonder if we're only being given half the truth about things there. If McDonnell's description of Cuba's social conditions is true, then the country is indeed a beacon of some kind of enlightenment we are deprived of in the US-sucking UK, albeit one imposed; but then we in the UK have things imposed on us all the time (unequal taxes, privatization, smoking bans and so on), none of which adds up to any kind of redistribution or social fairness. One does begin to wonder which country would be better to live in - on what McDonnell is saying, it sounds like Cuba to me.
Cuba is an independent sovereign nation and this is a free world. Cuba has not intimidated, interfered or imposed its ideology onto other countries like what the US has done and continue doing. Cuba has not invaded other countries and has not created terrorist organizations like what the US has done.Cubans lived within their own standard of living and within their means. So leave Cuba alone and let their own people to decide on the future of their country. But after saying that will UK be able to cater for a disaster like Katrina?
Oh dear alanm. Not too bright, are ya?
"there's no doubt that Castro has admirably defied US bullying over forty years, which surely should be commended in itself."
Cant you see the problem? You think that being in power for 49 years is a good thing?! You think its in the best interest of the country?! Oh dear...
"Castro has managed to create a true socialist state based on merit rather than heredity"
Where did you get this from?! Pay is more or less equally tiny, with people who are politically active and pro-Castro doing better than those who arent. Its hardly meritocratic is it? And its hardly efficient. And then... After 49 years of Castro, who takes over? Castro II. What did you say about heredity??
"One does begin to wonder which country would be better to live in - on what McDonnell is saying, it sounds like Cuba to me."
Well, alanm, maybe you should go live there eh? Or is the fact that the new statesman, (including John Mcdonnell) is banned there enough to put you off?
"Cuba has not intimidated, interfered or imposed its ideology onto other countries like what the US has done and continue doing"
Oh come on! You have no idea do you?! When the soviet union was sending castro money, he sent his troops all over the place. The only reason he stopped is because he doesnt have enough money.
In my experience those who accuse people of lying are often liars; those who accuse people of cheating are often cheats. Antileft is always accusing people of being stupid.
Very logical reasoning Powell. Maybe you should try contributing to the debate in some way instead of poking at it feebly with an intellectual stick.
You think it contributes anything to call people you disagree with stupid? It doesn't it just lowers the tone dickface.