Registered user login:

Happy 10th birthday Kyoto

Peter Hardstaff

Published 12 December 2007

As people at the Bali conference sing 'happy birthday dear Kyoto' Peter Hardstaff reports on America's blocking game

Last night I ended up at a ‘party’ to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the Kyoto Protocol and had the curious experience of hearing a bunch of delegates singing 'happy birthday' to the climate change treaty.

Speeches were made with several would-be orators making rather laboured attempts to compare Kyoto to the story of a growing baby.

It's a curious choice because, if Kyoto were a infant, when she was born it was without all of her limbs - Australia and the US were missing; aviation and shipping had been omitted to name just a few of her deformities.

Despite this fragility, she has abused (missed targets), misused (dodgy carbon-trading projects) and, in some cases, just plain ignored.

Cut to the present day and we find Kyoto, battered and bruised, on a hospital operating table. Part of an arm, (Australia) is sewn on. But the child is still in critical condition as dozens of doctors are row over how best to proceed with her treatment.

Some want to get the arm and leg on, give the kid a massive shot of adrenaline (extra commitments from rich countries + aid and technology transfer) and send her on her way.

Others want to ignore the leg operation entirely and are arguing that the original arm can be properly attached but Kyoto can only be saved if a whole new arm (binding commitments for big developing countries) is also sewn on. Trouble is, attaching a third arm will effectively create a different person.

The argument between the doctors is threatening to break into a full-blown fight. Kyoto is lying on the operating table. Her breathing shortens. Her pulse becomes more erratic. Will the doctors stop fighting? Will they agree on the right operation? Can the child be kept alive?

Ok, I got a bit carried away with the analogy. As for what is actually happening, the politics is ramping up. Conversations in the corridors reveal that the US is playing a blocking game; amongst other things undermining progressive moves to establish targets and create a meaningful process to transfer technology to poor countries.

I’ve heard that in the international trade talks at the WTO, when it comes to the crunch, Ministers and Heads of State start working the phones in order to persuade others to shift their positions. Well, the crunch is here; we now have less than three days to keep this thing not only alive but in a fit enough state to stand a chance of becoming a fully fledged climate deal. So, Hilary Benn, Gordon Brown; it’s time to get on the blower and find out if our relationship with the US administration really is all that ‘special’.


Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Cybertiger
12 December 2007 at 12:21

"So, Hilary Benn, Gordon Brown; it’s time to get on the blower and find out if our relationship with the US administration really is all that ‘special’."

Syphilis can cause madness and kills if treatment is delayed. The 'special' relationship needs to be treated in a 'special' clinic with massive doses of penicillin - and even then the chances of cure is minimal.

klambert
31 December 2007 at 17:34

Kyoto was still born. 10 years later an no one can see or even measure its efficacy. Billions wasted on what? The world is still left dithering over who pays whom and for what? Real progress will and can only be measured on an individual basis. If all countries are not expected to cut emissions on a per capita basis than nothing will be accomplished. How can a winter country like Canada be expected to cut emissions, if China and India are not expected to meet discernable targets??? Let us eliminate Canada from the whole question and we would still have an envirnomental nightmare. Why should Canada disporpotionally pay hundreds of millions of dollars to China and India when we are not really relevant! It is time for China and India to accept their repsonsibility to the rest of the world and be adults...they are doing nothing to quell the rapid urbanization of their countries and expect that we should pay for the obtuseness. I say enough! Good for Stephen Harper and the Americans.....we will take on our share if others do the same. Otherwise Kyoto is just a clever way of redistributing wealth to the 3rd world. I am tired of feeeling guilty for working 12 hour days so I can send tax dollars to disaffected countries. We enjoy a standard of living because we clawed our way to it...others are welcome to do the same...but do not expect us to pay for it!

Pat T
28 January 2008 at 22:32

About the only thing I could add to klambert's post is.... 10 years later and it isn't any warmer.......

When do you think they'll admit they were wrong - when it gets to be 12 years? 15? 20????

Or does being a collectivist mean never having to admit that you're wrong?

Pat T
19 February 2008 at 17:53

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/aug/10/weather.uk...

I guess they're saying they'll admit it in 12 years.

We'll have to see. I still say they'll blame the stall/cooling on aerosols, because "warming causes cooling" is just too laughable and "noise/signal" is just not valid after a few years.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Peter Hardstaff is the World Development Movement's head of policy. Prior to joining WDM in April 2002, Peter spent three years leading research and advocacy work on international trade policy issues at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?