Gaza: The jailed state

The world cannot afford to stand by while the Israeli army and Palestinian militias fight their unwi

As hundreds of Israeli families leave the town of Sderot in southern Israel to escape Hamas-designed Qassam rockets and mortars, Palestinians in turn are fleeing the wrath of Israeli air strikes on Gaza, which in the past week have killed more than 30 people, many of them civilians. This latest bloodshed in the besieged Gaza Strip comes hard on the heels of deadly inter-Palestinian battles between Hamas and Fatah that Palestinian security forces have been unable to contain.

These events leave the impression that the political leadership within the unity government has neither the will nor the capability to enforce a ceasefire and maintain its effectiveness. Some within Hamas are even saying that it would be in the interests of the Palestinian people to dissolve the Palestinian Authority here and now, because it has proved incapable of alleviating the Palestinians' misery or finding an enduring solution to the conflict with Israel.

While leaders of Fatah and Hamas are united in making strides towards reconciliation, the resistance shown by their supporters has forced Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and President Mahmoud Abbas to order the training of large numbers of police and army to secure the borders and bring order to the unruly state.

The government of national unity had been seriously weakened by the resignation of the Palestinian interior minister, Hani al-Qawasmi. Selected for the key post because he was independent of both groups, Qawasmi believed he had been rendered powerless to implement measures agreed in Mecca on 8 February 2007 in a signed deal between Fatah and Hamas sponsored by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.

The emergency summit had been called by King Abdullah following heavy fighting between Hamas and Fatah factions that had claimed about a hundred Palestinian lives.

During the Mecca summit, the king asked Khaled Meshal, the Damascus-based Hamas leader, why his movement couldn't recognise the State of Israel. Meshal's response was that this standpoint was not that of Hamas, but of the higher leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood, the worldwide Islamist movement. Hamas is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which believes that the land of Palestine is held under an Islamic waqf - meaning that no Palestinian, whatever his position, has the right to relinquish any part of it to non-Muslims. For this reason, Hamas has always spoken of relations with the Israelis in terms of a long truce, or what in Arabic is called a hudna.

When the obdurate non-acceptance of Israel led the international community to enforce sanctions against the Hamas-led government, the Palestinian population paid a high price. Some 70 per cent live below the poverty line and many rely heavily on handouts from the United Nations and international aid organisations. Many had been clinging to the hope that the recently formed unity government would revive international confidence in Palestinian governance and lead to the lifting of sanctions.

But Hamas's landslide victory in January 2006 had empowered its leaders to assume that they were not obliged to listen to other voices within Palestinian society. Cronyism and favouritism were the selection processes by which unqualified people were appointed to plum jobs. Freih Abu Middein, a former minister, well-known lawyer and leader of one of Gaza's largest clans, described the level of corruption within the Hamas movement after one year in office as being on a par with that of the much-maligned Fatah administration.

There was no improvement in services or lifestyle. Salaries were paid only in the first two or three months, and then they dried up. This alienated many Palestinians who felt that Hamas was not taking on board their concerns about the movement's handling of the Arab-Israeli conflict. They believed Hamas had to deal with the reality on the ground - that Israel, like it or not, exists. This is borne out each day as Palestinians undergo rigorous checks at the border. European observers may control the checkpoints, but Israelis monitor from a distance. And Israel has overall authority for the checkpoints, which are being closed several times a week.

As if all this weren't enough, al-Qaeda has emerged in the theatre of Gaza. In a video released and broadcast by al-Jazeera, al-Tawhid wa'al-Jihad - an al-Qaeda affiliate and the kidnap group that has held the BBC correspondent Alan Johnston in Gaza for more than two months - demanded the release of al-Qaeda activists. Its list included Abu Qatada, the militant Palestinian-Jordanian imprisoned in the UK and described as Osama Bin Laden's man in Europe, and Sajida al-Rishawi, the Iraqi woman who played a role in the bombing campaign that targeted Jordanian hotels in late 2005.

Johnston's kidnappers gave a glimmer of hope to family and friends when they used the password "Mombasa", the name of Johnston's cat. It appears he is being held by the same group that held two Fox News journalists to ransom in 2006. They were released after two weeks.

But the demands made for Johnston's release, the style of the video and other tactics bear the hallmarks of al-Qaeda's operations worldwide. The video has confirmed fears that al-Qaeda is taking advantage of the chaos and lawlessness to extend its reach into the Palestinian territories, and specifically the Gaza Strip.

A likely point of entry is the sprawling secret tunnel network connecting Egypt with Gaza. More than a year ago, Mahmoud Abbas sounded warning bells that al-Qaeda was becoming active in small cells in Gaza. Palestinians do not welcome the idea of extreme elements on their soil, as they wish their fight to remain within the boundaries of the Palestinian territories.

One name widely talked about in connection with the kidnapping of the British journalist is that of Dagmoush, a clan once allied to Hamas. But, according to sources, Mumtaz Dagmoush, one of the clan's leaders, has recently switched allegiance to Bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri. His close relationship with Hamas was severed after a Hamas activist killed a member of his immediate family. In revenge, Dagmoush threatened to reveal information about the dirty jobs carried out on behalf of Hamas, including the murder of Moussa Arafat, head of Palestinian military intelligence, killed in a raid on his house in Gaza in 2005.

The government of national unity has been much criticised for its response to the Johnston kidnapping, in particular its failure to make make Dagmoush feel under any kind of pressure. In the light of both this and the deteriorating relationship between Hamas and Fatah, Mahmoud Abbas is likely to feel that he has no option but to dissolve the parliament and call an election for both parliament and the presidency. Such a move would have to be approved by both Fatah and Hamas, otherwise Gaza and the West Bank could all too easily face a situation similar to the one in Somalia, where clans and warlords hold sway and determine the daily life of the people.

This places a heavy duty on the international community to address the chaos. The effects of the situation in Gaza could reach far beyond the confines of the Palestinian territories. There is considerable peril in allowing al-Qaeda's newest recruits to operate in Gaza.

The Palestinians urgently need international financial support and a just solution to their crisis. Recent fighting in northern Lebanon between the Lebanese army and affiliates of al-Qaeda (led by a Palestinian) has already claimed the lives of nearly a hundred civilians and soldiers. Al-Qaeda's new allies in Gaza are banking on the desperation of Palestinians inside the occupied territories to spread throughout the region.

Zaki Chehab is the author of "Inside Hamas" (published by I B Tauris in the UK and by Nation Books in the US)

Key dates in history of the Gaza Strip
Research by Shabeeh Abbas

1949 Egypt occupies strip following 1948 Arab-Israeli War

1956 Occupied by Israel after Suez War, in which Israel, France and Britain attack Egypt. International pressure forces Israel to withdraw in 1957

1967 Recaptured by Israel in Six Day War. United Nations calls on Israel to withdraw

1970 First Jewish settlement in Gaza

1987 First Intifada. Hamas is formed

1993 Oslo Accords. First Intifada ends. Palestinian Authority takes control of strip

2000 Ariel Sharon visits al-Aqsa Mosque, sparking the Second Intifada

2005 Israel withdraws troops but maintains control of the strip's borders and airspace

2006 Hamas wins elections. Crippling economic sanctions imposed on new government because of its refusal to renounce violence and recognise Israel. Clashes between Hamas and Fatah militants become commonplace

2007 Fatah and Hamas form unity government but fail to prevent factional fighting. Israeli air strikes continue to kill civilians

48 comments

Admin1's picture

From Letters to the Editor...

I am not Muslim or pro-Palestinian. I am English, Jewish and pro Human Rights and for 40 years these rights have been denied to the three quarters of a million Palestinians and their families who were dispossessed by an Israeli army (arguably authorized by the UN) who represented a minority faction in the land that was Palestine. The State of Israel was founded on the flawed proposition that Palestine in
1948 was ‘a land without people for a people without land’. This was patently untrue. About one million people lived in Palestine at that time, the minority of whom was Jewish. This was either ignored or concealed. These are facts, all else is commentary. The Israel Palestine conflict is about land that has been expropriated and water supplies that have been diverted. Today Israel treats international law and the UN with contempt and the world seems to be impotent in the face of international Jewish lobby groups who for years have persuaded their members to leave good homes and jobs in New York, London and Paris in order to fly to Israel to buy or build second homes on Palestinian land. This flies in the face of justice and morality. The proposition that a religious minority can deprive an entire people of their human and civil rights is invalid and devoid of any moral force.
Palestinians
have a right to their own autonomous state on at least 50%^ of the original land of Palestine, generally in accordance with the original UN resolution for partition.

MICHAEL HALPERN

Mick's picture

DenisMac # 3.
Absolutely right in everything you say!
To label Israel an "apartheid State" is an absolute misrepresentation of all the facts and a sad joke. Just try visiting almost any Arab Country with an Israeli stamp in your passport and see how far you get. Saudi Arabia has separate roads for Muslims & non-Muslims and a Christain guy was arrested two weeks ago for mistakenly being on the wrong road outside Mecca - didn't hear all you guys bleating about "apartheid" then!
Bottom line: The Palestinian Leadership doesn't want a State and never has done. It wants Israel to cease to exist and for all Jewish influence to be eradicated from the Middle East. Their sole aim is to integrate "Palestine" in its entirety into the Islamic "Waqf." The Palestinian Leadership has said this so many times, but the rest of the World doesn't want to listen to what it doesn't want to hear!
Until the Palestinian civilian population; shamelessly exploited and treated like dirt by its own leadership and the rest of the Arab World, decide it wants something better, this will not end.

PeaceNow's picture

Mick - can you guys make up your minds? you are telling us that Israel is a democracy and yet you keep comparing it to non democratic countries.... a democracy respects the rights of its citizens and all people are equal under the same laws.

as we all know Israel has a number of different laws. there is the Israeli laws for Jews only. there are the Ottoman laws in relation to stealing Palestinian land that applies on Palestinian only and there is the colonial British laws in relation to administrative detention without trail and collective punishment that apply on Palestinians in the occupied territories. and of course there are the unwritten laws that allows the Israeli occupation army to kill any Palestinian they suspect that he/she is breathing air illegally.

ikotubo's picture

PeaceNow: Well said!

Mick's picture

Israel is a democracy to be proud of which respects the rights of all its citizens. Ask the 1.5 million Israeli Arab citizens (out of a total population of some 6 million) which Middle Eastern Country they would like to live in and they will soon tell you. Just go to any Israeli hospital, university or even the Israeli Parliament (Arab citizens have the same voting rights as Israelis) to see equal rights in action.
Believe me, if any other Country's citizens were suffering the daily missile barrage currently killing and injuring Israeli civilians in Sederot & the Western Negev, that Government would be responding in a much harsher manner than the Israelis are currently doing.
"There hasn't been a single day in the last half year when we didn't have at least one child from Gaza under treatment for injuries sustained in internal Palestinian violence. We have contact with the Palestinian Authority health authorities all the time and we continue to treat Palestinians despite the Kassam rocket barrage on Sederot." ( Prof. Shaul Sofer, Head of Soroka University Medical Centre's Paediatric Emergency Dept).

ikotubo's picture

Mick: Apartheid South Africa was also a "democracy," and that did not prevent it from implementing the policy of apartheid. Indeed, have you ever wondered why Israel not only CHOSE apartheid South Africa as its strategic ally, but in fact equipped that odious regime with nuclear weapons (which could only ever have been used against black people in the rest of Africa)? It was because that relationship was a symbiotic one: both regimes believed (and Israel still does) in racial supremacy and segregation. The plight of the Palestinians both in Israel itself and in the occupied territories is therefore no accident.

Indeed, you could even argue that Nazi Germany was another "democracy," at least insofar as Hitler's rise to power was strictly in accordance with the constitution - not to mention the genuine popular support it also enjoyed.

So, let's spare ourselves this well-worn supposition that democracies cannot be atrocious regimes.

PeaceNow's picture

Mick - read the following story in the Jerusalem Post (link below) and tell me how much the Palestinian enjoy living under Israeli control and if the indiscriminate killing urged by the Rabbi any different than a suicide bomber?.
the difference being this is on a grand scale in comparison.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180527966693&pagename=JPost%...

this is what the Chief Rabbi said in a letter to PM Olmert " All civilians living in Gaza are collectively guilty for Kassam attacks on Sderot, former Sephardi chief rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu has written in a letter to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

Eliyahu ruled that there was absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians during a potential massive military offensive on Gaza aimed at stopping the rocket launchings.

The letter, published in Olam Katan [Small World], a weekly pamphlet to be distributed in synagogues nationwide this Friday, cited the biblical story of the Shechem massacre (Genesis 34) and Maimonides' commentary (Laws of Kings 9, 14) on the story as proof texts for his legal decision.

According to Jewish war ethics, wrote Eliyahu, an entire city holds collective responsibility for the immoral behavior of individuals. In Gaza, the entire populace is responsible because they do nothing to stop the firing of Kassam rockets.

The former chief rabbi also said it was forbidden to risk the lives of Jews in Sderot or the lives of IDF soldiers for fear of injuring or killing Palestinian noncombatants living in Gaza.

Mick's picture

FACT - Over 350 rockets were fired from Gaza directly at Israeli civilians in Sederot and the Western Negev during the Hamas "cease fire" period 26 November - 15 May. At least 260 missiles have been launched from Gaza at Israeli civilians in undisputed Israeli teritory in the last 2 weeks (15-30 May), killing and injuring civilians.
These missiles are deliberately launched by Hamas & associated terrorist groups from the midst of the Gazan civilian population. So much for Hamas looking after the interests of the civilian population who supposedly elected them!The Israeli Government has an absolute duty to protect its citizens by trying to remove the source of this continuous rocket fire. The Israelis go further than any other Army in similar circumstances to try and minimise the loss of civilian life, to the point where they often endanger the security of their own troops. They get very little credit for this in the international media. Any other Country subject to continual missile attack on its civilian population over such a long period of time (7 years in the case of Sederot) would surely be carpet bombing the source.
If the Gazan population wants to live in security, they will have to start to take some responsibility for trying to stop the rocket attacks launched from their midst and take some steps to ensure that the gushing stream of international aid flowing to their Government is directed towards their welfare, rather than on arms for the various terrorist groups.

PeaceNow's picture

Mich - I suggest that you stop reading the Israeli press and pay a visit to your psychologist.

only the mentally sick could justify bombing a whole city with no regard to its civilian population of over 1 million. and we thought Hitler the murderer is dead and burried.

are you telling us because 2 Israelis, and their death saddens me in as much as the tens of Palestinian victims of the Israeli assault, you justify killing hundreds of Palestinian civilians.

the might of the Israeli occupation army couldn't stop the counter attacks and you expect the ordinary civilians who are the victims of the Israeli occupation to do the job that the Israeli killing machine couldn't do. what a logic and a sad one.

ikotubo's picture

PeaceNow: It seems to me that you're wasting your time trying to get these people to engage with basic logic. They clearly do not wish to, because they have been told by "God" that Israelis are a chosen people - a people governed by different standards of morality from those governing everyone else.

But all is not lost, though: In the past, we were all prepared to accept the lies and the endless logical contortions - including the supposition that stone-throwing Palestinian kids were a threat to Israel's existence. And Arafat was supposed to be the only obstacle to peace. And we all had good reasons to do so: After all, here are a people who (with the Poles, Gypsies, communists, homosexuals, etc) had suffered so much under Hitler. But now that they have overplayed that card, the world is slowly beginning to wake up to the dangers posed by their fanatical and sinister ideology.

Latest tweets