Welcome to a new forum for students
Students are constantly being portrayed as apathetic, as blind consumers of bland 'tick a box and yo
By Gemma Tumelty Published 06 November 2006 17:29When I heard the New Statesman was relaunching its website and devoting part of it to campus activism and the issues that affect and inspire students, I was pleased to accept the opportunity to write for it.
Actually scrap that very polite start - not exactly hard-hitting for a radical. Truth is I bloody jumped at the chance. Students are constantly being portrayed as apathetic, as blind consumers of bland 'tick a box and you'll get a job-style higher education' - not to mention maxing out their credit cards when they're not snoozing till midday or stumbling home blind drunk.
Yes ok, some students enjoy a pint or two but there are also active feminists, environmentalists, gay rights campaigners and other politicos. Thousands upon thousands of us joined the call to Make Poverty History, thousands of us form a key part of the anti-war movement and apart from our proud history of social and international campaigning, students have also shown themselves instrumental in taking action on campus-specific issues. Like when Frank Ellis, a lecturer at Leeds university, commented that black people are inferior to white people.
At that point the NUS Anti-Racism/Anti Fascism committee and the student population at Leeds took action. They stood up and fought for his dismissal on the grounds that all students have a right to study in an environment free from discrimination. And their actions had an undeniable impact, with Dr. Ellis being suspended for breach of the Race Relations Act.
Radical canvas?
Time and time again students protest about campus closures, course closures, library closures, halls privatisations and sell offs and in support of our staff - we don't always win, but we always try. These and countless examples of other action go unreported. The point is that students defending resources, standing up to on-campus racism and lobbying the international community are all part of the 'radical' canvas - the activism and ideas that will make this site a cracking read and a sparring ground.
As the president of the NUS and as a former women's officer at Liverpool John Moore's university my personal connection to the concept of campus activism might seem obvious. NUS has traditionally fought for the rights of students and has been the seat of angry student voices through the years, not to mention being the former stomping ground of some rather politically engaged public figures. Jack Straw, Charles Clarke started here as long-haired lefties (whatever went wrong eh?).
Now more than ever NUS is urging students to get active to protect their rights. We think that students need to protect their right to education on the basis of ability not affluence, to protect and promote their rights to demand excellence for their money and to negotiate decent pay and conditions as they enter the seemingly inevitable part time job market to make ends meet. As I'm writing this, ministers are muttering that Muslim students shouldn't wear the veil on campus, and they are proposing that lecturers should 'monitor' students who they suspect of extremism. Protecting our right to expression and fighting to keep our campuses free of the racism, fear and suspicion that flies in the face of civil liberties is part of the brief of the 'radical'.
Anger over top-up fees led thousands onto the streets of London to support the NUS Admission: Impossible campaign. The halcyon days of free education are over. But surely when Tony Blair (who got one of those much yearned after free degrees) made his commitment to 'education, education, education' ten years ago he didn't intend to add a footnote 'for those who can afford it' - which is exactly what his government have instituted with their variable fees.
Make your voices heard
That a market is creeping into the sector, swaying students’ choices and creating a crude bums on seats marketing drive by some universities will no doubt take up some room on these pages. That student 'customers' are being gagged by unfair contracts will feature if NUS has anything to do with it. And they are the ones that even get into Higher Education. This year alone there are around 15,000 less students are going to University, our fear is this trend will continue, with some students priced out of education for ever.
Hopefully, what will come out of these pages is an expression of the diversity of student activity and opinion as well as the new challenges that students are facing. The Vietnam war and anti-apartheid marches were easier when education was free and one in five of us weren't in part time jobs. But we still march, lobby and make our voices heard. On this site we'll hopefully hear as much from part-time students, mature students, and students in FE whom the NUS are helping empower to shape their own education. Campus radicals ... bring it on.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















1 comment
If one is to maintain that students are undeserving of the pejorative epithets often ascribed to them, then one might seek to offer more convincing evidence than simply claiming 'there are also active feminists, environmentalists, gay rights campaigners and other politicos [on our campuses]'. Indeed, one might suspect that this qualifies as refuting any charge of apathy only to the extent that it would agree with the apparent presumptions of the article of how worthwhile political engagement might manifest itself. After all, there is no recognition of the radical engagement with politics by Muslim extremists in and amongst various Universities in Britain. Whilst disagreeing with their conclusions, it would seem disengenuous to write a piece on political engagement in universities (if that is what this article is truly about) without exploring such an unfortunate state of affairs.
With regard to the NUS, it remains debatable whether it plays any more vital a role within the lives of the majority of its student members than providing them with the means to receive a 10% discount in various bland retail outlets. I am a postgraduate student, and I chose to cancel my NUS membership on a point of principle, that principle being that it simply was not in any sense 'radical' enough. To maintain its incantatory stance regarding top-up fees without ever directing it's no doubt considerable intellect toward the reason why top-up fees are necessary seems a dereliction of duty for any union body that would claim to be acting in the best interests of its members. The answer is certainly not a simple one; but the fact that students with only two 'e' grades at A-level are now accepted in Universities simply means that it would be financially non-viable for any government to offer centrally funded support to all students. This is a shame, and those students who wish to kick on, and remain frustrated, both financially though often academically, by those who treat university as a temporary hedonist purgatory whilst deciding what to job to apply for, might well be justified in asking what the NUS is doing to protect their interests.
Of course, the modern day attitude would be to simplify this into a debate regarding elitist principles in which vocational training is often seen as the poorer brother of the university student. Such simplification is so ignorant as to be dismissed as dishonest. Vocational training is as important as university education, and some are suited to one rather than the other, and no socially motivated value-judgment could be made from one to the other; rather, the imposition of a centrally asserted model of success (to have '50% of school leavers in to University' etc.) is the true prejudice at the heart of the current debate, for it is this that demeans those not-disposed toward University education. Should students wish to get active to enhance their learning environment, then perhaps they could take a little time to reflect and get beyond the emotivist statements offered by those often deemed, usually by their own judgment, to be politically 'radical'.