It was surely very foolish of David Cameron to quote the water industry as a model for his scheme to privatise roads. The water companies in the south and east have just enraged the public with their hosepipe bans. "Diktats of the water police," screamed the Daily Mail front page. "Even spraying your children to keep them cool in the sunshine will be outlawed." Websites are full of complaints about water-industry profits, the volume of water leaking from unrepaired pipes and the level of household bills.
A couple of people have told me that, while we endure shortages, "they" are secretly exporting "our" water to China. The water companies cannot transport the stuff from the sodden English north-west to the south-east, and so this seems unlikely, but it is a sign of the public mood turning sour.
I recall no such anger when water was restricted during the mid-1970s drought. We enjoyed the glorious weather and accepted that parched gardens and overheated children were the price to be paid. Water was then in public ownership. Now, with bills up 45 per cent above inflation since privatisation in 1989, people think supplies should be guaranteed.
As for what will happen to roads, we need only look at France, which has long had toll roads. Until recently, they were run by state-owned corporations, which charged modest sums and contributed handsomely to the French treasury. Then they were privatised. Within five years, the average toll per mile was up 16 per cent for cars, 38 per cent for lorries . . .
Putin, Gingrich . . . Clegg?
Even now that they enjoy high office, it is hard to take the Liberal Democrats seriously. A "tycoon tax" sounds like something proposed by a sixth-form debating society. If, as Nick Clegg suggests, those on the highest incomes are required to surrender at least 20 per cent to the Exchequer, regardless of what "tax planning" devices their accountants concoct, this would quickly become the only rate that millionaires pay. Does Clegg imagine that the salaried middle classes would then be happy to continue paying 40 per cent?
We would be more than halfway to requiring everybody to pay the same percentage on the whole of their income - a "flat tax", as advocated by the US Republican Newt Gingrich and implemented in Vladimir Putin's Russia. Perhaps that is what Clegg wants.
Retiring, but not shy
Though I am a dyed-in-the-wool atheist, I shall miss Rowan Williams, who will retire as Archbishop of Canterbury this year. He may be opaque of speech but he is a lifelong New Statesman reader ("thank you for the New Statesman", he once wrote to me) and one of the few remaining public figures with the instincts of a genuine socialist.
It is a curiosity of our times that the C of E, once described as "the Tory party at prayer" and still with congregations where, I'd guess, the majority vote Conservative, is now almost alone in taking social and economic equality seriously, even while dragging its feet on spiritual equality for women and gay people. Reading a Church document on education the other day, I came across the following: "The Church is challenged to work for justice and liberation for all, to change the structures of oppression and injustice." The practice, at least in Church schools, falls short of theaspiration. But it is impossible to imagine the post-1994 Labour Party using similar language.
Kerm off it
Forgive me, but I cannot get excited about the "exposure" of Goldman Sachs. It is not a retail bank and its clients are not, therefore, little old ladies seeking a decent return on their life savings. Greg Smith, its former executive director - who wrote in the New York Times that the bank had lost humility and integrity and that its executives referred to clients as "muppets" - advised, in his own words, "two of the largest hedge funds on the planet, five of the largest asset managers in the United States, and three of the most prominent sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East and Asia", with "a total asset base of more than $1trn".
In other words, the capitalists at Goldman Sachs rip off other capitalists. True, the latter include the trading arms of high-street banks, with our own Royal Bank of Scotland under Fred Goodwin as chief muppet and you, me and little old ladies as the ultimate victims. But the scandal lies in how managers and traders in the financial sector as a whole expropriate, according to some estimates, as much as a quarter of what customers pay for insurance, pensions, mortgages and so on.
Goldman Sachs is merely exploiting those who have already exploited us.
It's been emotional
Even those of us who don't care much for football (well, you wouldn't if your team was Leicester City) were moved by the fate of Fabrice Muamba, the Congolese-born Bolton Wanderers midfield player who collapsed with a heart attack during an FA Cup match at Tottenham on 17 March. But can we please be spared the game's displays of contrived emotion, with players "dedicating" their goals to Muamba and wearing his name on their shirts?
There is hardly a sporting occasion anywhere in the world now that can begin without a period of silence in memory of a deceased ex-player, aplayer's father (mothers rarely receive such recognition), an official or even a fan. Silence couldn't be observed for Muamba, as he isn't dead - andseems, happily, to be recovering - but the football clubs have organised synchronised applause instead.
The FA Cup final is usually preceded by "Abide With Me", which is also played at funerals. Perhaps the hymn should now be played before all sporting occasions.
Next week: Helen Lewis