Leader: It is time for David Miliband to come in from the cold
The return of the former foreign secretary would be a huge help rather than a hindrance to Labour.
By Staff blogger Published 22 September 2011In a moving and poignant interview with Jonathan Derbyshire on page 54 of this week's issue, the New Labour pollster Philip Gould, who is dying, reflects on the fractious relationship between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and the one between Ed Miliband and David Miliband. "Gordon lost to a metaphorical brother," he says, "[but] David lost to an actual brother."
Mr Gould has spoken of his desire for David Miliband to return to front-line politics and to work with his brother to fulfil his dying wish - the election of a new Labour government. He is right to do so.
It was right for Mr Miliband, who served with distinction as foreign secretary from 2007 to 2010, to step down from the shadow cabinet after he was narrowly defeated by his brother in last year's leadership election. In his own words, he feared "perpetual, distracting and destructive attempts to find division where none exists". But one year on, it is clear that the return of the elder Miliband would be a huge help rather than a hindrance to Labour.
His return would encourage a significant section of the party, not least the 104 MPs who voted for him, to lend their unequivocal support to Ed Miliband. So long as their "lost leader" remains out-side the shadow cabinet and on the back benches, some will be reluctant to do so. Moreover, the speeches and articles he has written in recent months have reaffirmed his status as one of the party's best and brightest thinkers. On matters from the NHS to multiculturalism to the crisis of the European centre left, David Miliband has demonstrated a rare clarity of purpose. The talent pool of British politics is far too shallow for him to linger on the back benches and in the directors' box at Sunderland Football Club.
The differences between the brothers are largely of emphasis, not principle. They are committed to the former chancellor Alistair Darling's plan to halve the deficit by 2014 (although Ed has adopted a 60:40 ratio of spending cuts to tax rises, rather than the original 70:30 split). David's correct assertion that Labour should have founded the Office for Budget Responsibility does nothing to alter this.
The characterisation of David Miliband as a "Blairite" is wrong. Many know that he served as head of the No 10 Policy Unit during the Blair years, far fewer that he left because he was considered insufficiently reformist. In a long interview with the NS editor, Jason Cowley, in early 2009, he memorably spoke of the "red thread" that should run through all Labour policies; and in the leadership election he advocated a series of progressive policies, including ending charitable status for private schools, extending the bankers' bonus tax rather than raising VAT and supporting Vince Cable's proposed mansion tax on homes worth over £2m.
It is incumbent on those who call for Mr Miliband's return to pose the question of what job he should do. Having served as foreign secretary for three years, he will have no desire to shadow William Hague. He would make a fine shadow chancellor (and was offered the post after his brother's election) but it would be foolish to move Ed Balls, who has proved an effective foil to George Osborne, at this stage of the political cycle. The solution, perhaps, is to create a new policy-focused role for Mr Miliband, analogous to the position held by Oliver Letwin in the coalition government.
There are encouraging signs that Labour is renewing itself. On page 45, Stewart Wood, one of Ed Miliband's chief strategists, sets out an intellectual route map for the post-neoliberal era and argues that the party must "rewrite the rules that govern how Britain works". Labour is fortunate to have Lord Wood, a recently created peer, in the shadow cabinet.
In ambition and scope, Ed Miliband's political project is potentially as significant and as bold as the reform pursued by Margaret Thatcher and her Hayekian allies in the 1970s. Just as Mrs Thatcher shifted the centre ground of British politics to the right, so Mr Miliband now hopes to pull it leftwards. He will be best served in this endeavour if he has his brother alongside him in a shadow cabinet of all the talents.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

11 comments
Nathaniel - what about the torture?
Oh for god's sake shut up. All of you. This level of tedium constitutes a crime against humanity.
To bring back DM to the shadow front team would represent a collosal mistake on the part of EM. the main reason why EM was voted in was because Labour wanted a break from New Labour which DM represents. I believe that EM is doing a fantastic job and on the most of the important issues of the day, he has made the right call!!! Bringing DM would represent a dIstraction. Indeed DM represents all that is wrong with middle east policy pursued by New Labour, especially on the Palestinian question.
'His return would encourage a significant section of the party, not least the 104 MPs who voted for him, to lend their unequivocal support to Ed Miliband.'
Yes, because these MPs are so averse to democracy that they're unwilling to support the elected leader unless their little Blairite pro-torture friend tells them they can.
After what Labour did to the economy and the amount of money they p'ssed up the wall on scandalous PFI deals I never want to see them in power again. Oh and don't forget torture, ID cards, British jobs for British workers and the rest. Both milibands were complicit in the destruction of Britain.
What about the torture and the extraordinary rendition?
We all know how revenge is best served. I think David should take all the enjoyment he can from watching Ed lose in 2015 and then come back.
i would like to see david back, i believe he would have the courage to stand-up for businesses that want to encourage jobs, reduce corporation taxes so that new start-ups would setup here as clear no 1 preference rather than anywhere else and generally encourage entrpreneurship. i think david has the guts to say what is right and good for the country.
" Mr Miliband, who served with distinction as foreign secretary from 2007 to 2010.."
What about his complicity in extraordinary rendition and torture?
http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-det...
The infinetly wiser,More statesmanlike and far more respected David Miliband is just waiting for the appropiate time to take over. In David Milibands own words 'Ed needs a open field to lead the party as he see's fit'-Brilliant! The Backroom boys are taking centre stage, and considering who the senior backroom boy is Ed Miliband should 'beware the ides of march'.I have a question as David Miliband was the sacrifice for Iraq, who will be held account for the mistakes of Brown his two boys are hardly innocents,and it is impossible for Labour to have a new start with damaged people and for the Labour Party to miss out on someone that would have been a potential Prime Minister, Ed Miliband will always be second or even third, But i believe David Miliband will be giving a Talk on sunday before going to America , Ed's will be on tuesday will anyone be interested.
Post new comment