Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Leader: If EU students get free tuition in Scotland, English ones should

It is absurd that EU students receive a free university education in Scotland, while UK students pay full fees.

The 189,000 people who failed to win a place at university this year have even more reason than usual to bemoan their fate. Should they reapply, as many will do, they face the prospect of paying up to three times more for the course of their choice from September 2012. When the tuition fees bill was passed by a majority of just 21 votes in December, ministers assured the public that universities would charge £9,000 in "exceptional circumstances" only. Of England's 123 universities, however, 47 plan to levy the maximum fee for all courses. The average fee for institutions will be £8,393, far higher than the government's forecast of £7,500.

In Scotland, a different order prevails. Alex Salmond's Scottish National Party (SNP), which abolished the graduate tax introduced by the previous Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition, has maintained its pledge to provide free higher education for all Scottish students. As a result of the European Union's ban on interstate discrimination, the country's universities are also legally obliged to offer free entry to EU students but, because of a loophole, they are able to charge English, Welsh and Northern Irish students fees of up to £1,890 per year (£2,985 for medicine) - a figure that will rise nearly fivefold to £9,000 from 2012. Under European law, it seems, it is permissible to discriminate within states but not between them.

Now, at last, this bizarre legal interpretation is coming under scrutiny. Phil Shiner, of Public Interest Lawyers, is preparing to challenge the fees rise in Scotland on the basis that it contravenes Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits discrimination based on "national or social origin", as well as the Equality Act, introduced by the last Labour government.

We welcome Mr Shiner's intervention. It is absurd that students from Berlin, Lisbon and Madrid, whose parents contribute nothing to the national Exchequer, can receive a free university education in Scotland, while those from Belfast, London and Swansea are required to pay full fees.

Over the past decade, the number of EU students at Scottish universities has doubled to 15,390 and the annual cost to the Scottish taxpayer now exceeds £75m. The SNP's decision to force non-Scottish British students to pay is a cynical attempt to plug a £202m university funding gap.
The resentment felt by English students, who will soon pay the highest public university fees in the world, will further destabilise the Union. Free higher education is one of a panoply of benefits now enjoyed by Scottish citizens. Since taking office in 2007, the SNP has abolished NHS prescription charges, frozen council tax and introduced free school meals for all pupils aged five to eight. In addition, it has preserved free personal care for the elderly. Such policies may be politically canny but they have created a £10.5bn fiscal black hole.

The growing disparity between the two countries is a reminder of the incomplete nature of Britain's constitutional settlement. The UK is now neither a unitary nor a federal state and its largest constituent group - the English - feels increasingly unrepresented. For too long, politicians have complacently ignored threats to the Union; they must now act to repair our disunited kingdom before it is too late.

Tags: tuition fees  Scotland

38 comments

Hope Lewton's picture

This lazy and sensationalist waffle is riddled with inaccuracies, amongst them the statement that P1-3 children in Scotland all receive free school meals. This is untrue. Following the positive evaluation of the free school lunches trial carried out in 2007/08, legislation was passed in November 2008 to enable local authorities to provide free school lunches to all P1-3 pupils from August 2010. However, this does not mean that all local authorities did so - for instance in Glasgow the scheme was discontinued.

Real Northerner.'s picture

Great propaganda! Yes my English neighbours Project Britain's main aim of Anglizising the 3 other countries of the U.K has finally backfired when Britain and England merge into one and England has no distinction from it. Have your own 'state' parliament? Sure perhaps a state system like the U.S.A would be better but hell why mess around go it alone!

Tearlach's picture

This is getting so tiresome. When are you folk south of the border going to realise that Scotland is a different country with its own parliament, legal, educational system and political parties (well except for Labour).

As a Scottish Taxpayer with kids at University, why should I see the Scottish Block grant (which is a fair bit less than Scotland contributes to the Treasury) subsidise students form England?

Lox's picture

Tough. Why don't you go for UDI?

The Englishman's picture

HaroldB - I repeat - In order for a state to become a member of the EU it must sign up to EU regional policies. Most EU countries already had some sort of regional devolution the UK didn't, and the the way the UK gov decided to regionalise the British state was along its internal national boundaries as you say influenced by Scotland and the fact that the New Lab gov at the time was overloaded with Scotland's ministers. Only the geographical areas of the regions was decided by the British gov as regionalism was a necessity to confirm UK's entry into the EU.

Matt's picture

I was personally responsible for sending out posters to unis in scotland - and through contact details I left on the poster, I was contacted by Emma Block and got her in contact with a solicitor who was willing to help.

She agreed for me to give her phone number to the Times and sadly she was hounded by the media.

After the completion of some long application forms, no legal aid was granted, so we stalled and I lost contact with Emma who had probably had enough of all the Media attention.

The Campaign for an English Parliament was supporting the campaign and paid for the production of more fliers. Sadly NUS Scotland would not support the campaign for students claiming that Scottish students miight be disadvantaged by it.

Two points I'll make here:

1) There is such a thing as INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION so the argument about 'ordinary residence' does not hold any water. It is not coincidence that the majority of those oridinarily resident in Scotland are of Scottish national origin.

2) The majority of Englands MPs voted AGAINST top up fees - the fees were originally imposed on the English only via the votes of Scots MPs.

Andrew Sunter's picture

strange that the New Statesman should choose to attack the only progressive left-of-centre party actually in power in these islands at the moment.

Wyrdtimes's picture

The way the UK parliament treats the English is disgraceful. England needs its own parliament back and working in the interests of the people of England.

Contrary to Brit propaganda - an English parliament wouldn't require more politicians or cost any more money. In fact as an English parliament would render the House of Commons virtually obsolete an English parliament would lead to far fewer politicians and save a fortune.

Which is why the British establishment is so entrenched against recognition and representation for the English.

Home rule for England.

Helen's picture

Commentators ALWAYS fail to mention that if the tuition fees were imposed onto only the English, by the Labour government.

Gordon Brown personally pleaded with Scottish MPs to vote for top up fees, with the promise that the scots could charge the English if they applied to Scottish unis.

Not only that, if Scotland's MPs hadn't voted on top up fees for the English, we would not now be paying them, because the majority of English MPs voted NO.

This is the Auld Enemy mentality that Gordon Brown ruled over England with. We pay more newly invented stealth taxes than the Scots and get the least funding in return. Screw the Union. I will never be British again. The rejection of Britishness is rising in England - the politicians should be very afraid.,

Pam's picture

This leader fails to recognise that the Scottish Government's response is likely to be that they are making distinctions between students on where they live and not by nationality - rather a significant legal difference.
The real issue is why £9k fees are necessary in England. This is the result of the Coalition Government withdrawing 80% of teaching funding from English Universities and is an entirely different scenario to that under Labour when fees (maximum £3400 per annum) were additional to the public funding provided by the Government. The withdrawal of public funding will also reduce the Barnet formula and the funding available to Scotland.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets