Damn or fear it, the truth is that it’s an insurrection

Bankers loot the Treasury, MPs fiddle their expenses . . . and then the establishment turns on depri

On a warm spring day, strolling in south London, I heard demanding voices behind me. A police van disgorged a posse of six or more who waved me aside. They surrounded a young black man who, like me, was ambling along. They rifled through his pockets, looked in his shoes, inspected his teeth. Their thuggery affirmed, they let him go with the barked warning there would be a next time.

For the young at the bottom of the pyramid of wealth and patronage and poverty that is modern Britain - mostly the black, the marginalised and resentful, the envious and hopeless - there is never surprise. Their relationship with authority is integral to their obsolescence as young adults. Half of all black British youth between the ages of 18 and 24 are unemployed, the result of deliberate policies since Margaret Thatcher oversaw the greatest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top in British history. Forget plasma TVs; this was pano­ramic looting.

Such is the truth of David Cameron's "sick society", notably its sickest, most criminal, most feral "pocket": the square mile of the City of London where, with political approval, the banks and the super-rich have trashed the British economy and the lives of millions. This is fast becoming unmentionable as we succumb to propaganda once described by the American black leader Malcolm X thus: "If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing."

Money-moving parasites

As MPs lined up to bay their class bigotry and hypocrisy in parliament, barely a handful spoke this truth. Not one of the heirs to Edmund Burke's 18th-century rants against "mob rule" by a "swinish multitude" referred to previous rebellions in Brixton, Tottenham and Toxteth in the 1980s, when Lord Scarman reported that "complex political, social and economic factors" had caused a "disposition towards violent protest" and recommended urgent remedial action. Instead, Labour and Liberal bravehearts called for water cannon and everything draconian. Among them was the Labour MP Hazel Blears. Remember her notorious expenses? None made the obvious connection between the greatest inequality since records began, a police force that routinely abuses a section of the population and kills with impunity, and a permanent state of colonial warfare with an arms trade to match: the apogee of violence.

It seemed hardly coincidental that on the day before Cameron raged against "phoney human rights", Nato aircraft - including British bombers sent by him - killed a reported 85 civilians in a peaceful Libyan town. These were people in their homes, children in their schools. Watch the BBC's man on the spot trying his best to dispute the evidence in front of his eyes, just as the political and media class sought to discredit the evidence of a civilian slaughter in Iraq as bloody as the Rwandan genocide. Who are the criminals?

This is not in any way to excuse the violence of the rioters, many of whom were opportunistic, mean, cruel, nihilistic and often vicious in their glee: an authentic reflection of a system of greed and self-interest to which scores of parasitic money-movers, "entrepreneurs", Murdochites, corrupt MPs and bent coppers have devoted themselves.

On 9 August, the BBC's Fiona Armstrong - aka Lady MacGregor of MacGregor - interviewed the writer Darcus Howe, who dared use the forbidden word "insurrection".

Armstrong Mr Howe, you say you are not shocked [by the riots]? Does this mean you condone what happened last night?
Howe Of course not . . . What I am concerned about is a young man called Mark Duggan . . . the police officer blew his head off.
Armstrong Mr Howe, we have to wait for the official inquiry before we can say things like that. We don't know what happened . . . We're going to wait for the police report on it.

On 8 August, the Independent Police Complaints Commission acknowledged there was "no evidence" that Duggan had fired a shot at police. He was shot in the face on 4 August by a police officer with a Heckler & Koch MP5 sub-machine gun - the same weapon supplied by British governments, Tory and Labour, to dictatorships that use them against their own people. I saw the result in East Timor, where Indonesian troops also blew the heads off people.

The big sweep

An eyewitness to Duggan's killing told reporters: "About three or four police officers had [him] pinned on the ground at gunpoint. They were really big guns and then I heard four loud shots. The police shot him on the floor." This is how the police shot dead Jean Charles de Menezes on the floor of a London Underground train in 2005. And there was Ian Tomlinson, and many more. The police lied about Duggan's killing as they lied about the others. Since 1998, more than 330 people have died in police custody yet not one officer has been convicted.

“Funny, too," noted the journalist Melanie McFadyean, "that the police did nothing while some serious looting went on - surely not because they wanted everyone to see that cutting the police force meant more crime?"

Still, the brooms have arrived. In an age of public relations as news, the clean-up campaign, however well-meant by many people, can also serve the media goal of sweeping inequality and hopelessness under gentrified carpets, with cheery volunteers armed with brand new brooms and described as "Londoners" as if the rest were aliens. The otherwise absent Boris Johnson waved his new broom. Another Old Etonian, the PR to an asset stripper and currently the Prime Minister up to his neck in Hackgate, would surely approve.

128 comments

Mr. Divine's picture

Cronin: He lives in South London .. and I'll lend you the brick for this one... so long as you promise to bring them back.

How much do you think a good brick costs?

Colin Bowman's picture

Liked the article John; and the view of the unrest as a working class insurrection.

E Hart's picture

A well-written piece but just the bare facts are damning enough.

People haven't really woken up to it it yet - but they are going to pay one hell of a price for "expansionary austerity". That 's the price of keeping this odious, corrupt and greedy system in the manner to which it has become accustomed. Don't believe me? Watch!

WE are making okay for business as usual.

The banker-induced cuts haven't really started and there will be more as Osborne finds that he isn't cutting the deficit - he's merely adding to it.

Aggregate demand is dropping off - as reflected in falling sales in the shops - and unemployment is rising. All the indicators point to an economic nosedive. Osborne even had the temerity to mention that the new Enterprise Zones would create - he hoped - 30,000 new jobs by 2015. The economy lost 38,000 jobs in the last quarter alone.

The difference between looters and bankers is one of means and degree - that's all. They are poles apart in everything but their opportunism. However, what mitigating circumstances can you offer when the well-paid, comfortable and greedy help themselves?

ivan thomas's picture

Excellent article by Mr Pilger as usual.
This is the first time i've been to this site and I'm wondering How much it costs Conservative central office to employ all the trolls that lurk on the comments thread because they are clearly not here because they want to read the magazine!

Julian2's picture

The only politics this rabble expressed was the politics of nihilism, and they couldn't even spell it even if they'd heard of it. To dignify it as an 'insurrection' is ludicrous.
There is something poingnant about poor old uncle John - here here is again, thinking it's Christmas, ringing on the doorbell, expecting a sherry and an armchair and some of the turkey and sprouts, and all the while what we're doing is patronising his hoary old tales of derring-do in the jungle - how he rescued that tribe - where was it now? how he still has the bullet in his leg from when - when? well when that chap shot at him just as he was fording the river with the five starving infants over his shoulder, dodging gunfire - they all survived of course and one is a Pulitzer prize-winner for her account of surviving the river-crossing on the heroically broad shoulders of JP - anyway: the NS can't sack JP, not because any of the editorial board, or any of the other hacks, think his stuff is anything other than garbage, but because they are too bashful - JP s the ghastly smelly old uncle who turns up week after week expecting a suck on the sherry bottle. And the NS can't turn him away.
This is the tragedy of the left.

writeon1's picture

I think one can argue that there is a great deal of anger and desparation, fear and dispair, hidden just under the surface of millions of peoples lives in the UK. That was certainly the impression I got talking to a wide variety of people across the country.

There was massive disatisfaction with the grotesque inequalities that are so blatantly obvious in virtually ever aspect of life in Britain. People were very angry, but didn't know where to direct their anger. The people I talked to had absolutely no confidence in any of society's institutions. They didn't trust the media, thought there was one law for the rich and one for the poor. The politicians were all the same and crooks. The police were corrupt and lazy, the armed wing of the Tory party.

I thought, something is going to explode soon in this country. It can't go on like this much longer. Such deep-seated corruption, so much inequalty. The UK reminds me of a kind of 'aparthied' state, where the ruling class live in something close to a parallel society, with the poor and disenfranchaised seperated in their ghettos.

Just because the 'insurrection' wasn't overtly political in character, this doesn't mean it was the product of a political environment and the result of years of neglect and social degredation, caused by a vicious economic policy designed to 'loot' wealth and opportunity from the great mass of the people and transport it upwards into the hands of the few, the ruling class.

What surprised me, though perhaps it isn't really surprising, is that in a country so clearly riddled with massive class inequalities and social injustice in every sphere of life, that 'class' was virtually a taboo subject, especially in the media and the political circus. Is this because the British have a fear of talking about power in society, which is so closely tied to wealth and privilege, both of which are so monsterously and unequally distributed in the UK?

DisenchantedBrit's picture

Originally posted by Amere-Brush-hand: 'If you ever have the misfortune to become unemployed in the UK, you will get the shock of your life. You will not survive on benefits. How do you pay the utility bills, council tax, water rates, telephone and transport costs to look for a job?'

You can't get unemployment benefit in England, at least not for long. Claimants who refuse to take up a job offer (this can be anything from loo cleaning to sweeping the streets) that doesn't match their qualifications/experience are denied their benefits. Not only is the UK terrorizing civilians in Lybia, it is also terrorizing its own citizens. The sooner they wake up and realize this the better.

And that's just one example of a whole series of abusive practices on hellhole island.

Barry Ewart's picture

Disgraceful! This man should be birched! If those parents had only done what Lady Diana did for her children then there would be no problems in our society today! Just leave them £16m pounds each!

suburbanmonk's picture

The Uk is a facist country overwhelmed by sheep as is event by some of the above comments, people need to pull their heads out of their arses before it really is to late. That includes the new statesman!!!!

Barry Ewart's picture

"To the oppressed and those who fightt on their side" - Paulo Freire."

Latest tweets