Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Wake up, Labour

The party must tap in to the energy and liberating excitement of the anti-cuts movement.

www.newstatesman.com

The party must tap in to the energy and liberating excitement of the anti-cuts movement.

"Often, it takes some calamity to make us live in the present," wrote the American cartoonist Bill Watterson. "Then suddenly we wake up and see all the mistakes we have made." The early months of 2011 have been punctuated by big by-election wins for Labour and even bigger demonstrations, suggesting that the electorate is already regretting the choices it made at last year's general election. But don't be fooled. The second decade of the 21st century has echoes of the 1980s, when the left was seduced into thinking that it was right and proceeded to lose one election after the other. Despite the Barnsley Central election victory on 3 March and the Trades Union Congress demonstration planned for 26 March, something is wrong. We need to understand what that is, and fast.

Let's start with some counterfactual history. Imagine that Labour, against the odds, had won the general election in May 2010. There would have been much celebration. Then what? Then this: a Labour government implementing the harshest cuts to the public services since the Thatcher era; rubber-stamping huge tuition-fee increases, introduced through John Browne's review - which was initiated by Labour; sanctioning yet more academy schools; introducing destabilising welfare reforms. Throw in what Labour promised but never delivered during its first three terms, such as Trident renewal and the full introduction of identity cards, and the thought becomes decidedly uncomfortable.

Then remember what Labour did in office. It said that ownership didn't matter and there was nothing wrong with people becoming filthy rich. It indulged Rupert Murdoch and the bankers - and we cheered as taxes went down and house prices went up. It was Labour that allowed alcohol to get cheaper and made access to gambling easier. It was Labour that tried to sell off Royal Mail and opened the way for the privatisation of the NHS and education.

Successive Labour chancellors boosted the economy by inflating an unsustainable debt bubble and proclaimed that they had ended "boom and bust". On Labour's watch, the far right grew in strength, because immigration was used to undercut wages. Worst of all, the poor got poorer and the planet burned.

But what about the good stuff? Not enough has lasted, because Labour failed to put down any moral roots or build up a wider progressive alliance to protect it. Why? Because too little was about labour and too much was about capital. In the ten months since the last election, Labour has turned from exhaustion to confusion. It may be able to summon up plenty of righteous anger against the cuts - 80 per cent of which Alistair Darling would have been making, too - but seems happy to forget that its share of the vote was just 1 percentage point higher than what Michael Foot gained in 1983. Renewal cannot be based on hoping that people forget. Nor can it be built on denial, or happen in the absence of reconciliation.

I fear two things: losing the next election and winning it. Any Labour government is better than any Conservative government but, if we win next time round, what guarantee is there that it will be any different from last time? Little will change unless we outline plans for a "good society" that we are proud to share with the electorate, a vastly different political economy to underpin it and a credible progressive alliance to direct, elect and sustain it. There are still four years to go to the next general election, four years in which the coalition plans to cut services now, and taxes just in time - while blaming us for everything that's gone wrong. Labour, too, has a plan: it is that this plan won't work.

Siren songs

Ed Miliband's speeches are sound. He is saying broadly the right things about the limits of the state as well as the market. He has refused to tack back to the right, but it's tough being your own policy "outrider". Ed Balls is now pushing the bank tax, John Healey made a welcome appearance at the Liberal Democrats' spring conference and Sadiq Khan got the line right on prison numbers. But the renewal has to be more systematic and coherent.

MPs such as Chuka Umunna and Lisa Nandy show great promise. Jon Cruddas continues to push the boundaries of left-wing thinking. Maurice Glasman, new to the Lords, offers fresh ideas on the commodification of labour and land. Yet why is Labour so unable - or unwilling - to tap in to the energy and liberating excitement of grass-roots movements such as UK Uncut? Why didn't any of the Labour MPs join the 1,500 young activists at the Six Billion Ways event in east London in early March to talk about poverty, climate change and the remaking of democracy?

History teaches us that, in opposition, Labour wins by-elections, goes on big marches and feels good about itself. Meanwhile, the Conservatives win when it matters and Labour, out of desperation, eventually ends up occupying too much of the same old policy ground. Labour is lost. The unpopularity of the cuts and the demonisation of Nick Clegg are like sirens, luring us on to the rocks of permanent opposition. Both seduce us into thinking that all we have to do is oppose, all we have to do is wait.

The pillow is being placed on our face. Wake up, Labour - before it is too late.

Neal Lawson is chair of Compass. The TUC's March for the Alternative: Jobs, Growth, Justice gathers at the Victoria Embankment, London SW1, at 11am on 26 March

19 comments

A meadows's picture

Actually labour got 1.5% more of the vote than foot, and Labour can't tap into the anti cuts movement as tehy know had they won ,they'd have done the same

Scotty's picture

I have no problem with milliE's heritage, but I do have with his lack of character. He pontificates at the public sector trade union demonstration for more money to be spent on themselves, and compares himself and the demonstrators with heroes who risked their lives for their beliefs.
His support for the call for no cuts is a lie, as even he and his balls pal accept, under pressure, that they would have to cut also, slower and not as deep but dont ask for details because they are in opposition so they dont need to be honest, apparently !

The no cuts agenda has no energy, just bluster and confusion over what the alternative is.

...'s picture

Luddite...a person reflects their environment. You understand the heritage of this country through learning about it and not by being born in it. Surely, if we are all born in this country and choose to live under its culture and society we are fullly understanding of this culture?

Plus who are you really to speak? This country has a main religion that is middle Eastern in origin, has a Patron Saint who is of Turkish descent, uses a time and calendar system that is north african/mediterranean, uses a language that is attributed to Iran, via Germany, uses numbers from Arabia, and was only inhabited after the ice age by people who moved up from what we now call Europe, who themselves moved up from what we now call the middle East.

Culture and society changes and reflects the time we live in Luddite. It's about time you grew up as well.

Dan's picture

A decent article by Neal Lawson .His critique of the housing and credit boom underline what needs to change to modernise the economy .His connection between economic migration and de-regulated Labour markets reducing wages for the low paid has to be addressed .Its time for Labour to modernise to advocate the interests of the nation and not powerful sectional interests which the current government represents.

Luddite's picture

... The problem for the political-left is, it never grows-up. The very nature of the English is our warmth and our all inclusiveness. Labour did immense damage to this society with it's pursuit of multiculturalism an awful political idea, that is been binned throughout the whole of Europe.

Andy's picture

"Liberating excitement of the anti cuts movement". How about a bunch of spongers trying to keep on gouging the taxpayer? Scruffy gits who could not hold down a real job!

Leon's picture

The attention-seeking, racist rants of an idiot really shouldn't be attributed the response they so desperately crave.
Divergence from the real point of an article which poses a very good point; the direction of Labour, it would seem, as with the vast, vast majority of mainstream politics, is the pragmatic pursuit of votes over the resolute, practical application of political ideology. Shame really.
Hopefully, Ed will enact this.

Luddite's picture

Bak. So when did anti-Semitism become culturally unacceptable at the New Statesman or is Ed the right kind of Jew? Labour has very serious issues to address, one of identity. Labour's gone from being a broad church or is it a mosque, i forget these days, too a half-way house for malcontents. Turning our backs on 10 million blue-collar workers is not a good idea, and holding-out a welcoming hand to groups such as UK Uncut would be suicidal. Labour needs to take a long look at itself, after all we can't be all things to all men.

Attrition47's picture

Liarbour is quietly wringing its hands from the sidelines, as the Tories take up the poison chalice of sabotaging what's left of the Welfare State (for us poor), so as to add to the subsidies of the rich.

Gussie Fink-Nottle is the perfect Liarbour leader for now; vapid, millionaire and tory.

Herbert's picture

Luddite: 'You fail to understand being born in this land doesn't make you part of this land.'

All those poor Americans imagining that somehow the are 'Americans' just because they were born there, says Chief Sitting Bull.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets