Mili’s band of rivals prepares for battle
Those who assume that Labour is a weak and divided party with no appetite for power should think again.
By Mehdi Hasan Published 27 January 2011
Located at the end of a long corridor behind the House of Commons chamber, the shadow cabinet room is dark and unprepossessing. It is here each week that Ed Miliband, like his four Tory predecessors, has to rally his colleagues, organise his team and try to plot a route back to government. "It is a very depressing room," observed the then shadow foreign secretary, David Miliband, in May 2010. "It reeks of the absence of power."
But on the morning of Tuesday 25 January, as the shadow cabinet assembled for the first time since the resignation of the shadow chancellor Alan Johnson and the appointment of Ed Balls as his successor, there was a buzz in the air. Less than an hour earlier, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had announced that the economy had shrunk by 0.5 per cent in the last three months of 2010. The elevation of Balls, it was being said, could not have come at a better time.
Although the room is so small that there are not enough seats for everyone, with latecomers often having to stand, Balls, arriving late to the meeting after having carried out a round of media interviews, found his chair opposite Ed Miliband to be empty. None of his colleagues still on their feet had claimed the seat of the man who had suddenly become the de facto number two to the Labour leader.
Lincoln's in
Allies of the Labour leader are mostly relaxed about the promotion of Balls, one-time rival to Ed Miliband for the Labour leadership and his senior colleague at the Treasury. They have read and like to cite the US historian Doris Kearns Goodwin's book Team of Rivals: the Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, a riveting account of how the great American president brought his three most bitter opponents into his cabinet, thereby maintaining the unity of the nation and his party as well as encouraging collaboration and creative tension.
Team of Rivals has many admirers, from William Hague and Peter Mandelson to the Manchester United manager, Alex Ferguson, and Barack Obama. Obama invoked Goodwin's "brilliant" book prior to appointing Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton to the US vice-presidency and state department, respectively, while retaining the Bush-era Republican Robert Gates at the Pentagon.
Is Miliband, like Obama, presiding over a team of rivals, with the pugnacious Balls as his shadow chancellor; Yvette Cooper, Balls's wife, as the new shadow home secretary; and Douglas Alexander, former campaign manager for David Miliband, as the new shadow foreign secretary? Balls, Cooper and Alexander (and indeed Ed Miliband) are all protégés of Gordon Brown - ambitious, clever, fortysomething politicians from the social-democratic wing of the Labour Party.
Miliband, I am told, has not read Goodwin's book but is familiar with her thesis. Back in October, he knew he had to bind in the Blairites after he won the narrowest of victories over his brother - hence the surprise appointment of Alan Johnson as shadow chancellor. This past week, he knew he could not afford to alienate the Balls-Cooper axis a second time - hence the unsurprising appointment of Balls as Johnson's replacement. "Both decisions were the right decisions at the right time," says an aide to the Labour leader.
Privately, an inside source tells me, Balls now agrees. "It wasn't right for me then," the new shadow chancellor told a friend a few days ago. "It's right for me now."
His first full week in the job could not have gone better: criticisms of the coalition's growth strategy by the outgoing director general of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), Richard Lambert, on the Monday were followed on Tuesday by the ONS growth figures (or lack thereof).
Having underestimated and caricatured Ed Miliband, the Tories and their cheerleaders in the right-wing press risk doing the same to Balls. He is portrayed as an unreconstructed statist and dogmatic interventionist, even though he was the main architect of Bank of England independence. He has been denounced as a loony "deficit denier", in spite of his Harvard background and rather orthodox, Keynesian approach to deficit reduction - via stimulus, investment and growth.
But the truth about Balls is that he is divisive and disliked by many. "I think he was surprised at how hard he had to struggle to get the 33 nominations he needed to stand for Labour leader from his parliamentary colleagues," says a Blairite member of the shadow cabinet. And "Balls's rise to the top has left behind a long line of corpses," says a former Treasury colleague who worked with both Eds under Brown.
Detox plan
The new shadow chancellor will be moving in to the leader's suite of offices at the Norman Shaw South Building in Westminster. He will be two doors down from Miliband and is expected to attend meetings regularly to discuss economic and, in particular, fiscal policy. Balls's long-serving special adviser Alex Belardinelli has been asked to "work closely" with Tom Baldwin, the Labour leader's new director of strategy. Miliband aides stress there is to be no repeat of the Blair-Brown divisions of old.
I was surprised to discover that most leading Blairites are willing to give their old adversary the benefit of the doubt, at least for now. "I think Ed Balls recognises that this is an opportunity to detoxify his brand," a former cabinet minister and friend of Tony Blair says. "I suspect Ed will be on good behaviour," says a shadow cabinet minister and close ally of David Miliband. "He knows he's being watched by the PLP, who'll be ready to pounce on him if there's even a sniff of a Sunday Times briefing against any of his colleagues."
Miliband's decision to appoint Balls, Cooper and Alexander - each a potential leader-in-waiting - to the top three jobs in his shadow cabinet was bold. His Lincolnesque challenge now will be to harness the creative tensions, contain the inevitable clashes of personality and confrontations over policy and persuade his talented colleagues to concentrate their fire on the Conservative-led coalition.
The goal is obvious: a quick return to government. "I want to be chancellor of the Exchequer," Balls has been heard telling friends in recent days. Those who assume that Labour, led by Ed Miliband and Ed Balls, is a weak and divided party with no appetite for power should think again. Defeated last May, the party is feeling emboldened once more.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


20 comments
If Ed Milliband wants to emulate the Abraham Lincoln theory, wouldn`t it be prudent to bring big brother David back into the shadow cabinet?
Ed Balls just isn't attractive to floating voters, who under first past post systems decide elections.
Balls is popular among Labourites because he hates George Osborne and can be quite spiteful and personal when talking about the enemy. This makes supporters feel good, but floating voters don't like that kind of politics.
David Miliband appeals to floating voters a bit like Blair did - because he seems reasonable, intelligent and calm. Brown lost votes because he was seen as having a temper, Michael Howard lost votes because he was seen as nasty.
Anger just doesn't play well with the electorate - most of whom aren't ardent socialists.
The cuts/no cuts battle has already been fought and the cuts have it, the cuts have it,. The public are overwhelmingly behind the idea of cutting back on state spending (although only when it affects other people) and the public overwhelmingly blame the last government for the debt crisis.
It's time to move on, and actually put forward a credible deficit reduction plan, rather than ranting about how posh george osborne is.
David Miliband would be a good candidate for shadow chancellor as he is calm and reasonable. Balls just acts like a thug driven by a venomous hatred of the rich. D Miliband and Blair realised that the rich had to vote Labour to win elections.
A centrist shadow chancellor would've been the best option, but Ed's chosen the architect of the deficit in the public's eyes.
Balls will be good fun to watch in the commons, but I like a political fight. Most average joes and josephines don't, as Bercow keeps reminding us.
Before you can spend wealth first you must create wealth. We have no alternative but to end our over-reliance on public spending and the ever increasing tax burden which in turn increases the national debt, and instead start building a sustainable economic future based on wealth creating industies, the private sector and investment in innovation and enterprise. but above all up an end to political economic dogma.
I heard:
David Cameron believes Luddite?
Leader approval ratings from the latest Angus Reid poll:
Miliband -5
Cameron -9
Clegg -23
(negative means more disapproval than approval). In summary, Miliband is ahead (or, least behind).
Wow some people come on here to knock the Labour party, which up until 4 weeks ago I would have done the same But as I watched the Vicious exchanged from David Cameron and also many of his front bench team, against the disabled against other politicians against charity s against schools against students I have now decided the only real government of the people and for the people is Ed Miliband and his new line up on the front benches I see a general Election in October of this year most likely the 20/10/11 put this date on your calender because this Tory-lead government is sinking even faster than Gordon Brown
We need a new Government who instead of making the people turn on each other, brings them together again and only the Labour Party can do this ..
Its sickening that powerless politicians relish the news of a 0.5% drop in the economy. Perfect ammunition for the new shadow chancellor!
In fact the sad truth is the quickest way back to power for labour is a nice crisis.
Of course, its not just a labour trait. Mainstream politicians just want power.
All we need is for the restructuring of the nhs to be a disaster, that'll be brilliant- the public will come back to us!!
I have no doubt this will happen, and perhaps a nice double dip recession.
So sad though
Ed Milliband will regret bringing in Mr Balls into his shadow cabinet. Mr Balls is pure poison. If you don't believe me, asked his work colleagues.
i suppose the real question is whether ed balls has learnt anything from the criticisms that have been made of him, and his failure in the leadership contest.
if he is insightful enough to recognise that there are certain aspects of his personality that might benefit from a little change then he will move forward and be an asset.
if he can recognise his good points and minimise his bad ones this could work.
it is the ability to recognise where we have made mistakes and failed, and to respond that makes us successful. whereas those who never make mistakes might often just be those who are more cowardly.
Govenments loose elections and Mr Posh and Mr Pledge are doing thier very best to achieve this. Ed Balls will reduce Gideon to the amature out of touch public schoolboy that he is.
Post new comment