The party game is over. Stand and fight
The lesson of the French anti-government protests is that “normal” politics exists only to promote corporate interests. Britain must prepare for a rebirth of the only thing that works — direct action.
By John Pilger Published 04 November 2010
"Rise like lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number!
Shake your chains to earth, like dew
Which in sleep had fall'n on you:
Ye are many - they are few."
These days, the stirring lines of Percy Shelley's "Mask of Anarchy" may seem unattainable. I don't think so. Shelley was both a Romantic and political truth-teller. His words resonate now because only one political course is left to those who are disenfranchised and whose ruin is announced on a government spreadsheet.
Born of the "never again" spirit of 1945, social democracy has surrendered to an extreme political cult of money worship. This reached its apogee when £1trn of public money was handed unconditionally to corrupt banks by a Labour government whose leader, Gordon Brown, had previously described "financiers" as the nation's "great example" and his personal "inspiration".
This is not to say parliamentary politics is meaningless. It has one meaning now: the replacement of democracy with a business plan for every human activity, every dream, every decency, every hope, every child born.
No rationale
The old myths of British rectitude, imperial in origin, provided false comfort while the Blair gang built the foundation of the present "coalition". This is led by a former PR man for an asset stripper and by a bagman who will inherit his knighthood and the tax-shielded fortune of his father, the 17th Baronet of Ballintaylor. David Cameron and George Osborne are essentially fossilised spivs who, in colonial times, would have been sent by their daddies to claim foreign terrain and plunder.
Today, they are claiming 21st-century Britain and imposing their vicious, antique ideology, albeit served as economic snake oil. Their designs have nothing to do with a "deficit crisis". A deficit of 10 per cent is not remotely a crisis. When Britain was officially bankrupt at the end of the Second World War, the government built its greatest public institutions, such as the National Health Service and the arts edifices of London's South Bank.
There is no economic rationale for the assault described cravenly by the BBC as a "public spending review". The debt is exclusively the responsibility of those who incurred it, the super-rich and the gamblers. However, that's beside the point. What is happening in Britain is the seizure of an opportunity to destroy the tenuous humanity of the modern state. It is a coup, a "shock doctrine" as applied to Pinochet's Chile and Yeltsin's Russia.
In Britain, there is no need for tanks in the streets. In its managerial indifference to the freedoms it is said to hold dear, bourgeois Britain has allowed parliament to create a surveillance state with 3,000 new criminal offences and laws: more than for the whole of the previous century. Powers of arrest and detention have never been greater. The police have the impunity to kill; and asylum-seekers can be "restrained" to death on commercial flights.
Athol Fugard is right. With Harold Pinter gone, no acclaimed writer or artist dare depart from their well-remunerated vanity. With so much in need of saying, they have nothing to say. Liberalism, the vainest ideology, has hauled up its ladder. The chief opportunist, Nick Clegg, gave no electoral hint of his odious faction's compliance with the dismantling of much of British postwar society. The theft of £83bn in jobs and services matches almost exactly the amount of tax legally avoided by piratical corporations. Without fanfare, the super-rich have been assured they can dodge up to £40bn in tax payments in the secrecy of Swiss banks. The day this was sewn up, Osborne attacked those who "cheat" the welfare system. He omitted the real amount lost, a minuscule £0.5bn, and that £10.5bn in benefit payments was not claimed at all. Labour is his silent partner.
The propaganda arm in the press and broadcasting dutifully presents this as unfortunate but necessary. Mark how the firefighters' action is "covered". On Channel 4 News, following an item that portrayed modest, courageous people as basically reckless, Jon Snow demanded that the leaders of the London Fire Authority and the Fire Brigades Union go straight from the studio and "mediate" now, this minute. "I'll get the taxis!" he declared. Forget the thousands of jobs that are to be eliminated from the fire service and the public danger beyond Bonfire Night; knock their jolly heads together. "Good stuff!" said the presenter.
To the barricades
Ken Loach's 1983 documentary series Questions of Leadership opens with a sequence of earnest young trade unionists on platforms, exhorting the masses. They are then shown older, florid, self-satisfied and finally adorned in the ermine of the House of Lords. Once, at a Durham Miners' Gala, I asked Tony Woodley, now joint general secretary of Unite, "Isn't the problem the clockwork collaboration of the union leadership?" He almost agreed, implying that the rise of bloods like himself would change that. The British Airways cabin crew strike, over which Woodley presides, is said to have made gains. Has it? And why haven't the unions risen against totalitarian laws that place free trade unionism in a vice?
The BA workers, the firefighters, the council workers, the post office workers, the NHS workers, the London Underground staff, the teachers, the lecturers, the students can more than match the French if they are resolute and imaginative, forging, with the wider social justice movement, potentially the greatest popular resistance ever. Look at the web; listen to the public's support at fire stations. There is no other way now. Direct action. Civil disobedience. Unerring. Read Shelley and do it.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


213 comments
Hmmmm, shame you didn't suggest this civil disobedience when Labour were in power John, it might have had some meaning and integrity then.
@Joe ordinary: The CND protests started in the early 60s and intended to get rid of nuclear arms, unilaterally. Do we still have nuclear arms? Yes. Successful protest ?...err no.
No the CND protests didn't get rid of US cruise missiles. They were going to move them anyway. Greenham Common .. a success? We still have fing nuclear missiles!!!
The poll tax RIOTS(?)!!!! Brought about the demise of Margaret? Give me a break! Is there is poll tax???? YES THERE IS A POLL TAX!!!! Did people protest.. Yes. Did people succeed in getting rid of the poll tax? NO.
So CND and the Poll Tax protests (riots!) failed.
Give me one example of protests succeeding in Britain in the last 50 years. Anyone.
This is precisely the reason that I feel disgusted to be English.
altogether now................................
"Let's get this straight - you're opposed to strikes in Britain but you support them in Venezuela? Presumably you're also against free elections in Britain but support them in, say, China. Very strange politics I must say."
Nice non-sequitor about the free elections that do exist in Britain and that doesn't exist (let alone an election) in China.
But I'll ask it again: How about em strikes Venezuela?
Spot on, John. You forgot to mention that the old Left is dead. Anti-capitalist resistance must come through working-class self-organisation without leaders and bureaucrats. Not by following bands of middle-class dweebs selling the Socialist Worker.
You appear to have soiled the threadbare remant of your own dignity in my absence.
How amusing.
Martin - quite.
@HansCastrop
I might agree with some of your distaste for Milne's views. However, his expose of Roger Windsor, former Chief Executive of the NUM, seeking to smear Scargill by seeking financial support from Gaddafi speaks volumes about some of the high-ups in the British unions and the infiltration of the intelligence service. The rank and file need to winkle them out from their cozy offices and make all others fight for their worth. The reward for real leaders would be a return from the union office to the workplace to enjoy the fruits of their labour and the respect of their fellow workers.
Now, one would have to be a dewy-eyed sentimentalist to actually describe the UK electoral system as a paragon, a beacon, modern democracy in action.
Most europeans, for example, when they learn how the system works, throw their hands up in horror, and after a few minutes they start to say, "And you call that... Democracy!" I, sadly, have to agree with them. It isn't, but then it is, after a fashion.
What's shocking is that a party can have a "landslide" electoral victory and a whopping, unasailable majority of MPs, yet based on a clear minority of the votes cast, often as little as 42%. Which translates to less than 30% electoral support, as one has specifically devised and allowed a system to evolve that turns off around half the electorate who can't stand any of the buggers anyway. This is an accident, but design. It means it's easier to gain power for one's faction if one can mobilize one's minority better than the others. A subtle and smart system, effective, but hardly democratic.
Arguably democracy is the rarest form of government ever devised, so rare that one hardly ever finds it, and when one does, it's very temporary and extremely fragile.
Paradoxically the greatest flowering of democracy in Britain existed long before their were mass elections, during the Civil War, when the normal control mechanisms were weakened for ovious reasons.
Then we get a long, long, period of reaction. Leaving aside the Chartist Movement, we then have to wait until the Post War period for another democratic flowering, culminating in the "60s." And that's it, basically.
Thatcherism was a form of polite, British, fascism, which put paid to the Trades Unions, the Labour Party, the alternative, people's culture, castrated the media, and effectively turned back the clock decades.
Crushing the opposition and imposing the dogma of "there is no other way." And all that on only 42% of the votes!
Now UK democracy is; subservient, harmless, docile, tamed, and subjugated. Just how people from my end of the social spectrum like it. Because for us, "democracy" and "freedom" don't mean the same things as they do for everyone else. We've inverted these concepts to mean something very different; rule by a minority, wealth and power held by a minority, the propaganda channels under firm, elite control, education turned into training, culture neutered; all this, is, after all, the norm, and everybody else, one way or another, has to pay "tribute" to the ruling elite.
Post new comment