Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The tyranny of conventional wisdom

The same political pundits who called the general election and the Labour leadership race so hopelessly wrong have lined up to proffer their "advice" to Ed Miliband.

"I could have gone off to have one of the biggest jobs in world politics six months ago: to be the EU high representative for foreign affairs," David Miliband reminded me in August, in the midst of his doomed, summer-long struggle with his brother, Ed, for the Labour leadership.

I couldn't help but be reminded of those words a few days ago. "South Shields now has its first Morrisons," tweeted the former foreign secretary on 22 November. "I opened it this morning." From opening negotiations with the Taliban in Helmand to opening supermarkets near Newcastle - how the mighty fall.

For many of his admirers, however, David will for ever remain Labour's "lost leader". The conventional wisdom had been that the elder Miliband would succeed Gordon Brown as leader of the Labour Party. He was the odds-on favourite from the moment he declared his candidacy in May; at one stage, his younger sibling was a 33:1 outsider. Four days before the ­result was revealed, a well-connected supporter of the elder Milibrother confidently ­announced on the Labour Uncut website, "David Miliband has won".

As is so often the case, the conventional wisdom was wrong. Ed Miliband - denounced as "Forrest Gump" by some of his brother's backers - proved to be decisive, tenacious and ruthless. He showed he had the "bottle" that his elder brother lacked. Meanwhile, the unions' role was decisive; David's lead among MPs and members wasn't big enough to guarantee victory; and most of Ed Balls's supporters in the Parliamentary Labour Party broke for Mili-E, not Mili-D, in their second preferences.

Mocked

It was the economist J K Galbraith who coined the phrase "conventional wisdom" in his 1958 book The Affluent Society. He called for more independent thinking in public life, and a greater willingness to challenge the underlying assumptions of the great political and economic debates of each era. "While the world moves on," he noted, "the conventional wisdom is always in danger of obsolence."

One of the most frustrating aspects to writing a regular column on British politics is having to challenge the conventional wisdom in which so many of our leading broadcasters, reporters, columnists and now bloggers seem to bathe. Groupthink abounds inside the Westminster village. Lazy assumptions proliferate like weeds.

Take the run-up to the general election. For much of 2009, political correspondents and pollsters, columnists and commentators queued up to predict the size of the impending Tory landslide. Would it be double-digit? Or triple-digit? The idea that the Tories might fail to win the election outright was, to put it mildly, considered "unconventional".

I remember being mocked by some of my peers for daring to suggest on these pages, in June 2009, in the wake of Labour's humiliating defeat at the European elections, that the Tories' poll ratings were "soft" and Labour still had "a fighting chance of a hung parliament at next year's general election".

In fact, I have a private note still sitting on my desk from one of the country's leading pollsters, dated 21 February 2010, predicting a "28-seat overall majority" for the Tories. He wasn't alone in his misjudgement. Eight out of eight pollsters surveyed by the Independent on Sunday on 11 April predicted a Conservative majority.

As Galbraith wrote: "The enemy of the conventional wisdom is not ideas but the march of events." More than 50 years on, events may have trampled on much of the conventional wisdom that has infected British politics but its purveyors are a stubborn and shameless lot. The same political pundits who called the general election and the Labour leadership race so hopelessly wrong have lined up to proffer their "advice" to Ed Miliband. He has to be more visible and noisy; he needs to move to the "centre"; he has to challenge his party and cut its links with the unions; he needs to assert his authority; he has to give a "make-or-break speech"; and so on and so forth. These commentators tend to be Tory partisans or uber-Blairites, who cling to a neoliberal, centre-right consensus which, in the words of one member of the shadow cabinet, "spectacularly exploded in front of our eyes two years ago".

But Miliband has little to worry about right now. The coalition's approval ratings turned negative three months ago; Labour has been leading in several recent polls. The voters care little about the internal voting mechanisms of the party, and are more concerned about a rise in VAT than the intricacies of OMOV. There are divisions inside the shadow cabinet but these can be exaggerated. I'm told that the shadow chancellor, Alan Johnson, has offered "private assurances" to the Labour leader that he was not "stirring things up" with his recent comments on the 50p tax rate. Thankfully, Miliband has not been panicked. "He is not an excitable person," says a source close to the leader. "He has a laser-like focus on what he wants to achieve."

Chaos theory

Meanwhile, much has been made of how he lacks a Jonathan Powell or Alastair Campbell in his inner circle. His chief adviser, Stewart Wood, who helped mastermind his campaign, has been ennobled, and joins the front bench as shadow minister without portfolio. His press aide Katie Myler, daughter of the News of the World editor, Colin Myler, is leaving to join the PR giant Burson-Marsteller. And his former special adviser in government Polly Billington these days keeps busy preparing her boss for Prime Minister's Questions. But Tony Blair, it is often forgotten, became Labour leader in July 1994 and did not appoint Powell or Campbell until the start of 1995.

Miliband has time to deliberate - but not necessarily as much as he or his allies might assume. Another piece of conventional wisdom is that the next general election won't be until May 2015; that is, the party has four and a half years to luxuriate in opposition. The phrase "this is a marathon, not a sprint" is invoked by supporters of the leader. Perhaps. But as the political chaos across the Irish Sea, induced by another economic crisis, has demonstrated in recent days, such certainties are a thing of the past. Or, as one shadow cabinet minister put it to me: "Shit happens." The coalition shouldn't get too comfortable. Nor should the Labour Party or its leader. These are not conventional times. So beware conventional wisdom.

Tags: Ed Miliband  David Miliband

33 comments

writeon1's picture

But there is also incredible opportunity which presents itself on a silver platter, if one has the courage and imagination to reach out and grasp it.

And that is the promise of combining and representing the interests of the vast majority of the population, the old working class with that of the middle class, against the ghastly and transparent confidence trick that is contained in the concept of the Big Society and the coalition's policies.

It won't be easy to define what the common interests of the working class and middle class are, but it is possible, and more importantly it's absolutely necessary, and the only way for Labour to move forward. But such a bold strategy means confronting 'conventional wisdom' and reavealing it for what it really is. This is an awsome intellectual struggle, but a positive one because it's based on reality, not the illusions of propaganda.

But the ruling elite control, almost exclusively, the means of propaganda in society. It's their ideas, which reflect their narrow economic interests and power, that define social discourse. Their version of 'reality' that dominates the airways and the press.

However, as the crisis proves, their ideas are totally redundent, false, and discredited. The dying ideas of a dying economic model.

But are the leaders of Labour the kind of people who are going to stand up and say this forcefully and directly? Unfortunately, I don't think so. They have mostly spent their entire careers retreating, bending over, and coming to an understanding with the dogmas of neo-liberalism, so to expect them to abandon 'apeasement' at this stage is asking a lot.

But circumstances may force some in the leadership to alter course, especially as millions of people, especially among the middle class are going to feel the hard edge of the coalition's cuts on a scale they have never seen, or can imagine.

elrob's picture

Tomjoad:
What Eddie boy has to do is firstly not over egg his 'end of New Labour' approach. He must remember that despite Labour being in power for 13 years,the worst recession in 60 years and the MP's expenses scandal, the Tories did not win a majority, so there were millions of people who still agreed with many of 'new Labours policies'. Indeed if Brown had not had his 'bigotgate ' moment who knows what the current shape of the government would be.
------------
That is a very rosy picture of New Labour's popularity. Perhaps the Tories only got 36% despite 13 years out, on a ticket of "change", and the biggest recession in decades; because they are simply not popular.

I have been surprised at the amount of people I met during the election, who have not seemed particularly working class (as my 1980s unemployed mum and dad background is) but who simply loathe the memory of Thatcher. To me, the Tories have a lower ceiling of support than previously - as do Labour. Neither is loved. It is why the LibDems had a chance to leap forwards - since spurned.

But the end of New Labour message could be positive for two reasons. One is that it isolates Miliband from the mistakes and wrong calls of New Labour: Iraq, ID cards, extortionate house prices (extremely bad to millions of people, in case you need it explaining), deregulation of financial services; and shows him as the "change candidate". It is certainly a shallow slogan, but effective none the less. He is change from the Tories/Orange Book LibDems and their neoliberal ideology; and from the New Labour same.

What the pundits out there are missing, which Mehdi Hasan notices, is that we have just lived through a history-turning moment. The implosion of the world financial system, bailed out by taxpayers has changed the entire game.

Just as the 1970s stagflation did for the post-war consensus on economic policy in the 1980s, so this will do for the 2010s. It did not happen overnight in the 70s (Old Labour replaced Heath's Tories); and same today, an unchanged Tory Right replacing neoliberal New Labour.

The post-war consesus was dead - Thatcher realised it. The neoliberal consensus is no longer tenable, Ed Miliband realises it. He can be our Thatcher if we have the guts to support him.

Those railing against him are looking backwards, and have yet to smell the coffee.

frances smith's picture

conventional wisdom seems to be generated in part by the belief that history repeats itself, so that just because an alistair campbell figure helped blair get into power, then now ed miliband needs one too. but of course we have no idea what might have happened if there had been no alastair campbell, in fact labour might well have won the '97 election with michael foot still leader, given how unpopular the tories were by then.

and in reality history never repeats itself, the past may be useful in teaching us lessons, there may be echoes of it in the present time, but we will never be in exactly the same place, at that same time again.

but i suppose for many people an analysis based on past events is the easiest, which is why conventional wisdom is so powerful a force.

i think a leader who is nothing like blair or cameron, personality wise, is exactly what labour needs, especially if he is going to think carefully about what policies the party now adopts, particularly on the economy.

but people fear the unknown, so conventional wisdom is a comfort blanket that people keep hold of, as providing some certainty, or security, no matter how often it turns out to have been wrong.

Fighting4EdMiliband's picture

Good article, unconventional wisdom in the political analysis! Ed must avoid rightwing Labour advice. He needs more support from party members disaffected by his lefty thinking and approach. Ed M must learn to smile more and attend 'humour classes' and of course listen to Ken Livingstone and seek advice from Tony Benn because he lacks foresight, knowledge and experience of difficult times!

Martin's picture

"For much of 2009, political correspondents and pollsters, columnists and commentators queued up to predict the size of the impending Tory landslide."

Who did this? That's not what I remember. Polls pointed to a hung parliament.

I don't remember any consensus about David Miliband being a shoo-in as leader either.

"But Miliband has little to worry about right now. The coalition's approval ratings turned negative three months ago; Labour has been leading in several recent polls."

Means nothing. Labour enjoyed huge poll leads in 1981. Then look what happened. I'm surprised Labour's lead is so small, given the cuts. Remember also that Labour's rating improved while its leader was on paternity lead.

I'd guess there's a consensus that Labour elected the wrong Miliband. That's because Ed Miliband lacks the personal qualities necessary for the job. He's a weak leader with zero charisma.

Here's perfect illustration of what's wrong with him:

http://maxatkinson.blogspot.com/2010/11/eds-weekend-miliramblngs.html

You campaigned and spun for this loser and now we're stuck with him.

tomjoad's picture

What Eddie boy has to do is firstly not over egg his 'end of New Labour' approach.He must remember that despite Labour being in power for 13 years,the worst recession in 60 years and the MP's expenses scandal,the Tories did not win a majority,so there were millions of people who still agreed with many of 'new Labours policies'.Indeed if Brown had not had his 'bigotgate ' moment who knows what the current shape of the government would be.
So Eddie boy don't throw out the baby with the bath water.
And Eddie,come on son,don't slouch, stand up straight
get some new suits and ties,show us some charisma , give us a hook to hang our hopes on.At the moment you look like a giggling student researcher in the Harold Wilson era who,when no one is looking ,stands at a podium pretending to be the leader. Cliches like we must listen to 'the hopes and aspirations of the British people' do not cut the mustard,we don't live in the 60's any more we are not that naive to be taken in by such phrases.
Advertising exceutive Cameron and the Tory press will rip you limb from limb is you don't shape up.
Remember the majority British people are of the 'soft left' persuasion and your policies should reflect that,despite what frustrated union leaders tell you.

Eugene N White's picture

Interesting article, you're certainly right about how conventional wisdom can so often get it wrong. How many great leaders or progressive thinkers were dismissed in their time as dangerous radicals or the lunatic fringe?

I'm not sure how tyrannical all this conventional wisdom can be though. How much, for example, Ed Miliband actually listens to those who insist that unless he moves to the centre-right, Labour won't be electable come the next election.

It certainly seems to be something that is more a problem for those in the media like yourself who might be risking ostracisation (is that a word?) than for any politician who is genuinely in-touch with the feelings of the consensus of the population. In truth, successful politics may have a long history of challenging conventional wisdom.

mount1's picture

This is a great article, a bit Westminster-game-heavy for my personal liking, but based on a premise that is intensely of the moment in many fields. Keep up the good work, thanks.

DanWhit's picture

Don't forget Galbraith's other appropriate insight from The Affluent Society - 'Nothing much divides those who are liberals by common political designation from those who are conservatives.' How right he's been proven to be!

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets