Labour needs to reconnect with England
Labour has lost four million voters in England since 1997. To win them back it must start speaking t
By David Miliband Published 01 July 2010
World Cup time means a conversation about England. The passion and pride come bursting out; so does the black humour. Whether it's the foreign coach saga, the faults of national players or the profusion of St George's flags, this is the moment we talk about England. At the general election, Labour received fewer than one in five votes in each of the three southern regions of England outside London. Almost nine in every ten voters Labour lost between 1997 and 2010 are in England. That's over four million lost English voters and 137 lost English MPs. If Labour is to avoid becoming a regional or sectional party, we need to confront the task of winning back our support among working-class and middle-income voters across England.
Labour is well placed. The Tories have no serious presence in Scotland; the Lib Dems are barely credible across swaths of the UK (think of Wales).It is only Labour - with its MPs, MSPs, AMs and thousands of councillors across Great Britain - that can speak for the whole nation. Tony Blair's connection with "Middle England" was a profound electoral attribute. It is less well remembered that early on Tony made the patriotic case for strengthening the bonds of community.
Cap doesn't fit
I know how passionately he felt. But, over time, he failed to take sufficient account and respond fast enough to the real struggles that many communities faced in confronting the impacts of globalisation - migration, low wages and public services under strain. When I campaigned in the last election it was very clear that the effect of this failure was people turning their backs on Labour. They felt we were no longer standing up for them at a time of huge change in their lives.
The easy answer is that immigration was the cause and that we should have been tougher. Yes, we should have prepared better for the initial opening of borders within the EU. We learned our lesson. But to say that if we somehow get tougher on immigration then these voters will come flocking back to Labour is wrong. We have to tackle the whole difficulty, not just part of it.
I don't want to engage in a Dutch auction on immigration. It's not my way and it is not Labour's. In fact, I don't think it's our country's way either. Just ask Michael Howard about the 2005 general election - he tried it and lost. Now we face a much bigger problem. There was not enough concern for the ties of belonging and place, which constitute so much of what makes life worth living. In many core Labour communities, a disdain for tradition and enthusiasm for hyper-modernity, constant change and all the glittering wonders of globalisation cost us votes and in some cases the BNP benefited.
Gordon Brown faced a different problem. As a Scottish prime minister confronting the Anglocentric media, he sought to emphasise the bonds of Britishness. His was a heartfelt and rigorous account of British national identity but it failed to capture the public imagination. Moreover, as Gordon was seeking to construct an idea of Britishness from above, more and more of our fellow citizens were expressing an identity bound up in the history and iconography of England, Wales and Scotland. Gordon's great achievement was to solve the Scottish question (of a Scottish prime minister governing the UK in an age of devolution), but he did not resolve Labour's English question.
Labour needs a revived politics of Englishness rooted in a radical and democratic account of nationhood. We need to draw upon a specifically English story that points to the battle for social justice born of a proud tradition of personal liberty and independence - as resentful of corporate elites as meddling bureaucracy.
The challenge is to translate a notion of Englishness into the veins of our politics. One of the defining features of Englishness is its very diversity. There are many Englands: there is the conservative England of G K Chesterton, Hilaire Belloc, and now David Cameron and Nick Clegg; there is also the leftist England by which I am inspired - of mutualism, co-operation and the epic history of places such as the north-east, home to my constituency.
Robin Hood
On policy, the English commitment to democracy, to equal life chances and to challenging corporate excess can be seen in widespread support for an elected Lords, free school meals and the "Robin Hood" tax. The politics of England are also closely bound up in questions of the governance of Britain. Labour as a party remains too centralised, too London-dominated. We must recognised that, after a strong start, our mission to devolve power and challenge the centralised British state foundered.
An "English Parliament" is not the answer. We must strengthen the civic pride and economic resilience of English towns and cities. This is how the sense of identity, belonging and place of the many Englands can be better embedded and expressed. Labour needs to work with the grain of local and institutional affiliations - from army regiments to hospitals, from fire services to local authorities.
Globalisation has brought many gains, opening up our lives to new ideas and new opportunities. But its unforgiving logic has also shattered communities and industries. The people of England demand that we not simply be subject to the logic of the global economy, but shape its possibilities for the common good.
If Labour is going to gain support outside its metropolitan heartlands and aspire to government again, it needs to speak for England and identify with its traditions and values. In four years' time, as the English football team lifts the World Cup in Brazil, Labour needs to be leading that national conversation.
David Miliband is shadow foreign secretary and the MP for South Shields.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


49 comments
"Scotland voted Labour simply because they were awash with money from England and New Labour policies did not affect them" says tally above. Aye, right!
Scotland voted Labour because the Tories have been wiped out since Thatcher and the SNP were denied a place in the TV debates. Devolution has arguably made the SNP a marginal party when it comes to UK elections.
But just watch the Lib Dems being obliterated next May in the Scottish elections while Labour probably regain power but maybe only as a minority government or with a small majority.
Then wait until 2015 when there are elections for both Westminster and Holyrood after years of austerity from Osborne or his successor and an ineffectual Labour administration in Edinburgh. Whither the UK?
Why do people prioritise their English-ness/Welsh-ness/Scottish-ness over their Britishness? It's f*cking petty.
David you say "Gordon's great achievement was to solve the Scottish question (of a Scottish prime minister governing the UK in an age of devolution), but he did not resolve Labour's English question."
I think you are a bit muddled. It is not Labour's English Question. It is England's English Question. Why should MPs elected in Scotland be involved in English affairs? MP's elected in England are not involved in Scottish devolved matters!
You dismiss an English Parliament without giving any reason other than to jump to Engish regionalisation. How would that resolve governing England as a nation?
We need an English Parliament, English Executive and English First Minister.
No one I know trusts labour - end of
No one I know will ever vote labour again.
Very big on spin, very poor on fairness.
"...early on Tony made the patriotic case for strengthening the bonds of community."
Is this the same Tony who, according to disclosures at the end of last year, saw a ‘driving political purpose’ in permitting mass immigration, to make manifest the ideal of a ‘truly multicultural society’?
Of course these two positions might necessarily not be mutually exclusive; but they probably are.
The need of man facilities is a good ideology for development , so when its available at cheat means that could not limit any of your friend to search for it . many people in a Africa are to serve provided they are earning some thing .so you better try them. thanks.
This is a glaringly self-serving article.
He says “Labour needs a revived politics of Englishness rooted in a radical and democratic account of nationhood. We need to draw upon a specifically English story that points to the battle for social justice born of a proud tradition of personal liberty and independence”. Note that he says Labour needs all this, not that the English need it. Why does Labour need it? To get back into power!
Having extolled a “democratic account of nationhood” and the “English commitment to democracy, to equal life chances”, he then completely negates this by saying “[a]n "English Parliament" is not the answer”. Why the inverted commas around English Parliament? Why does he want the notion of an English parliament – which would embody that democratic account of nationhood and commitment to democracy and equal chances that he recommends - to seem absurdly outlandish? Because he’s afraid that the English would not vote Labour in enough numbers to get a Labour government in the English Parliament!
A depressingly familair articulation of time-worn platitudes from 'the great hope' of a chastened Labour Party.
David, you are irreversibly idenitifed as the voice of the Blairite establishment, and have done little to disavow that designation. For the good of your party, stand aside (eloquent and learned though you are) and let a candidate better place to revive the left to step forward: after the coming debacle of the Cameron-Clegg interregnum, the country will be responsive to a genuinely progressive candidate. You are, quite simply (and however brutally) too associated with the disappontments and the unfulfilled promise of an earlier era. (Ed, perhaps...)
"England overwhelmingly voted to be governed by Conservatives "
Overwhelming wishful thinking from an anti-progressive dinosaur?
new labour are an anti english political party and have been for the past thirteen years, new labours hatred for middle england knows no bounds, gordon brown coudnt wait to steal english pensions, tony blair and alistair cambell now have a new irish identity wake up and smell the coffee folks.