Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

Leader: Electoral change – glimmers of hope?

Published 05 November 2009

Electoral reform remains the key to unlocking democracy in this country

For the past year, this magazine has been arguing for a referendum on electoral reform. Dismissed by some as a nerdy preoccupation on the fringe of British politics, it nonetheless holds the key to unlocking democracy in this country by breaking the stranglehold of a million or so voters in a handful of marginal seats in Middle England.

Specifically, the NS has called for the Prime Minister to hold a referendum, to coincide with next year's general election, on a proportional voting system.

Mr Brown rejected the idea in his party conference speech, promising only a referendum after the election, and that on a non-proportional alternative. So, this week, we devote a special supplement to making the case for electoral reform once more. In it, the cabinet minister Ben Bradshaw issues an optimistic rallying cry. Don't give up, he says - the government's position is not "set in stone".

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

1 comment from readers

Frederick Roots
06 November 2009 at 13:55

Never mind electoral reform - what use is that when

the concept of voter representation is all but wiped out

by the way our political system works? In practice, our

once every five year vote counts for nothing since the

Commons in particular virtually never holds the

government to account. I heard David Starkey on

Question Time in April (see Youtube for the detail)

advocating constitutional changes that would make

our democracy come alive). We should, he said have

an elected Prime Minister - elected by us, that is; a fully

elected House of Lords, and MPs reinvigorated so that

they hold the executive to account. This is a sort of copy

of the American system where the people's votes do

have an impact on what is done by government.

Why do we have 643 MPs, when as in the current

parliament, a huge amount of legislation goes through

on the nod and much of it never comes to the

commons for debate at all? Virtually all of the freedom

sapping legislation of the Labour government has

been generated and discussed only by the ministries

themselves. Who had any say about the Vetting and

Barring regulations as a case in point? Only the

people in the Home Office. Who had any discussion

on RIPA that was used by a local council to spy on a

lady in Poole and her family for twenty one days? I

wonder how many of the three and a half thousand

new crimes enacted by New Labour in the last eleven

years were actually debated in the Commons.

Precious few, I'll warrant.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker