Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

Tory fiction, media fact

Mehdi Hasan

Published 24 September 2009

A right-wing echo chamber of columnists, bloggers and think tanks uncritically supports Conservative policy

Shadow chancellor George Osborne. Credit: Getty Images

Is there a right-wing echo chamber in this country? How else to describe the loyal army of columnists, bloggers and think tanks that regularly lines up behind the Conservative Party, parroting uncritically the policies and pronouncements of HM Opposition?

Originating in the United States, the "echo chamber effect" relies on the constant and unquestioning repetition of a given view through as many media channels as possible, giving the (false) impression of a consensus and denouncing alternative sources of news and opinion as biased or untrustworthy. "This process," says the US-based Centre for Media and Democracy, "can be used to turn an unsupported allegation or a partisan talking point into an ‘accepted fact'."

It is, therefore, now an "accepted fact" that Britain has a "debt crisis", though the level of national debt (as a proportion of GDP) is lower than that of Italy, Germany, France, Japan or the United States. It is now an "accepted fact" that spending cuts have to be made immediately, though Nobel Prize-winning economists, and our own Danny Blanchflower (page 19), point out that slashing spending in the midst of a recession is the height of economic illiteracy. It is now an "accepted fact" that the Prime Minister lacks integrity - indeed, the Tory leadership is obsessed with what David Cameron has described as a "thread of dishonesty" running through Gordon Brown's premiership.

Co-ordinated smears

On 16 September, George Osborne, shadow chancellor, declared that Brown "has misled the public, he has misled the Commons; he was not telling the truth". That Osborne himself may have been deceiving the public with his conspiratorial claims of an "income-tax bombshell", based on "secret documents" that turned out to be not so secret and an analysis of public finances that has since been challenged by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, is conveniently ignored in the drive to peddle the "Brown is a liar" narrative at every turn.

Benedict Brogan, the Telegraph's chief political commentator, used the outrageous absence of outrage at Osborne's hysterical remarks to argue that "if there is no reaction, it is because we have collectively come to the same view, that the Prime Minister cannot be trusted to tell us the truth". Sorry, but was I out of the country the day Brogan was elected spokesman for the nation? The only group that has "collectively" come to that conclusion is a right-wing spin machine. Nakedly partisan commentators such as Brogan (who recently rhapsodised that "if we have avoided the national humiliation of being dropped into the banana league category, it's thanks to them [Cameron and Osborne]") are a fixture of that machine.

But partisanship, it seems, is the exclusive preserve of the left. My colleague James Macintyre, whose reporting on the Conservatives' strange new alliances in the European Parliament has discomfited the party high command, is routinely accused by Tory bloggers of being a Labour spinner or some kind of entryist at the New Statesman. I can reveal that the smears have been co-ordinated at the highest level, one Conservative Central Office (CCO) press officer even writing to a prominent blogger on the right who had refused to join the witch-hunt: "I would also argue with you calling a journalist [Macintyre] 'excellent' who was implicated in the Damian McBride story."

Macintyre had nothing to do with the McBride affair and is on the record condemning the latter's "ugly personal smear stories". So what source did the CCO spin doctor provide for his false, libellous and potentially career-damaging accusation? A solitary link to an unfounded story on a gossipy right-wing blog.

It is becoming clear that great effort is being made to discredit the handful of journalists who have broad sympathies with Labour or the centre left and to accuse them of being in hock to the government. Tory-supporting journalists, bloggers and think tanks, meanwhile, often purport to be impartial and dispassionate.

The reaction to Fraser Nelson's appointment as editor of the Spectator is a case in point. Nelson is a partisan right-winger. Yet Tory bloggers such as ConservativeHome's Tim Montgom­erie were quick to extol his independence. "With a few exceptions . . . Matthew d'Ancona [Nelson's predecessor as editor of the Spectator] has pursued a friendly relationship with the Conservative Party. My guess is that will change somewhat under Fraser Nelson."

Really? In a diary column for the magazine, Nelson bragged that he had received congratulatory texts from Cameron and Osborne ("yet nothing at all", he said, "from No 10").

All hail the cult

High-profile think tanks such as Policy Exchange and the Taxpayers' Alliance (TPA) are quoted uncritically on the BBC, despite their numerous links to the Tories (the past two directors of Policy Exchange have gone on to work for David Cameron and Boris Johnson; the current director of the TPA is a former Conservative Party researcher). As a result, they skew the debate on public spending and other issues to the right.

The echo effect is so pervasive that I can think of only two prominent Tory commentators who have remained immune to the cult of Cameron - the Telegraph's Simon Heffer and the Mail on Sunday's Peter Hitchens. On the other side of the ideological divide, as even ConservativeHome's Montgomerie acknowledges, "only the Mirror is sure to endorse Lab­our" at the next election. It is no wonder Labour ministers, struggling to make their voices heard above the noise of the right-wing echo chamber, have begun referring to themselves as "underdogs", with Peter Mandelson, the Business Secretary, advising them to act like "insurgents, not incumbents". In media terms, there is no doubt that the coming election will pit a Labour David against a Tory Goliath.

Mehdi Hasan is senior editor (politics) of the New Statesman. Next week: John Pilger.

Read Mehdi Hasan's blog at:newstatesman.com/blogs/dissident-voice

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

mount
24 September 2009 at 10:35

I hate to say it, but maybe the uncomfortable truth is that the Brown era has reached its end with the public, and not just the media. After all we never voted for him.

taghioff.info
25 September 2009 at 06:09

The key comment in this article for me is the way that the total and utter failure of the Economic model that the Tories first introduced to the UK has been spun into a public spending crisis originating with New Labour.

Now there is a big lie.

Dennis Sewell
25 September 2009 at 12:22

"High-profile think tanks such as Policy Exchange ..are quoted uncritically on the BBC"

Policy Exchange is usually identified as as a "Centre-Right" or "Conservative-leaning" think tank in BBC reports, despite the fact that PE has no serving or retired Tory politicians on its board, while the IPPR has Neil Kinnock and a bevy of other Labour pols, plus Shirley Williams for ballast.

"the past two directors of Policy Exchange have gone on to work for David Cameron and Boris Johnson"

So what? Geoff Mulgan left Demos for Downing Street. Matthew Taylor left the IPPR for Downing Street. Phil Collins left the SMF for the same destination. Carey Oppenheim arrived back at the IPPR after being a Blair adviser. It's what policy wonks do.

"I can think of only two prominent Tory commentators who have remained immune to the cult of Cameron ... Simon Heffer and... Peter Hitchens."

Actually you can only think of one - Peter Hitchens is not a Tory., as he has frequently made clear.

But hang on, "cult of Cameron" is a bit much. David Cameron was at least elected in a contested leadership election.

"It is becoming clear that great effort is being made to discredit the handful of journalists who have broad sympathies with Labour"

Do tell me what efforts have been made to discredit Steve Richards, Jackie Ashley, Michael White, Martin Kettle, Jonathan Freedland, Polly Toynbee, Oliver Kamm, John Harris, Mary Riddell or Andrew Rawnsley?

And who has been behind attempts to smear Nick Cohen, Martin Bright and David Aaronovitch? It sure wasn't your unnamed black ops co-ordinator in CCHQ.

(To name but a few of the "handful" of the higher punditry with "broad sympathies" for Labour.)

"Nelson is a partisan right-winger"

Good heavens, the new editor of the Spectator is an out-conservative. I wonder what his predecessors Ian Gilmour, Iain Macleod, Nigel Lawson, Charles Moore, Dominic Lawson and Boris Johnson would have to say about that?

So much to fisk...so little space.

Greg
25 September 2009 at 12:26

And you are part of the left-wing 'echo chamber' that is continually pushing the line that as Britain's debt to GDP is actually lower than Germany, Japan, etc, that it isn't a big deal.

Firstly, it is not just the level of debt but the cost and ability to refinance that debt. Have you even looked (or know where to look) to find the basis point differential between, say, 10-year government debt from Germany, Japan, etc, and 10-year gilts? In almost all cases, the cost of Britain refinancing is substantially higher.

Secondly, it is not just Britain's level of government debt that is the problem but the total level of 'external debt' combining all government, corporate and personal debt. This stands at 400% of GDP, according to analysis from Michael Sunders at Citigroup, and is the highest by far in comparison to similarly sized economies, and is substantially higher than the next country, which is France at 176%.

William
25 September 2009 at 13:12

We are now experiencing the last days of our true Democracy. The press are coming into a situation that they cannot by law support a political party that is contrary to the EU.

Anything deemed unlawfull in any member state transfers to all carte blanche, courtesy Societas Europeas.

Daniele
26 September 2009 at 17:30

I think William is on a paranoid Europhobic trip which is not even remotely relevant to the issue raised here! Watch out William the nasty European Foreigners are after you !

To go back to the question of the right wing propaganda being orchestrated in Britain at the moment I am more and more convinced of its existence and I don't think I am being paranoid here.

(see the discussion about the "Question Time " panels in the other article by Medhi "The Tories and the BBC").

In America, "Fox News" are experts at this, to the point when they have now convinced a large number of gullible Americans that "Obama is racist" that "he hates white people" that he is a "communist/ Marxist/Socialist" you name it. He is compared to Hitler and then to Stalin , whatever, he is a dictator! OH! and he wasn't even born in the USA. He is not even an American, that surely makes him an heretic, a spy, a terrible danger to America. He is bound to betray the "real" Americans and destroy America. Some have even go as far as naming him the "Anti-Christ" no less.

All that sounds ridiculous to us but the American media knows what they are doing.The constant drip-drip effect works. They know that the Americans only need a bit of encouragement to go back to their old racist ways.

In this country the same phenomenon (without the ludicrous excess) is happening, not to an individual but to alternative views.The rightist views , like Medhi says, are now mostly presented as the consensus, facts that everyone agrees on because there are so few voices out there allowed to express an alternative view of the world without being shouted down (like Medhi is constantly).After all Britain is a Murdoch Empire!

Apart from Medhi and Pilger, I have access to different opinions through the "Medialens" website which is a terrific site which denounces the "accepted" views peddled in the media, with journalists telling us a completely different version of the current events, It is an eye-opener and worth a visit.

nationalbankuganda
29 September 2009 at 16:34

This article is not saying anything I don't already know. The 'echo-chamber' effect is a stunt the Tories have used for 30 years. You subconsciously see it in everyday life - even if its just some innocent punk documentary that claims the 70s were full of strikes, reproducing the image of stacked up rubbish or pictures of graveyeards. Which therefore suggests the 80s, 90s and 00s - were not. New Labour are not a victim of the 'echo chamber' effect - they were a consequence of it themsleves.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan is the New Statesman’s Senior Editor (politics).

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the Iraq inquiry be a whitewash?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker