Return to: Home | Politics

Europe turns right as the progressive vote collapses

Published 11 June 2009

This should have been the perfect moment for centre-left parties to triumph

The social-democratic parties of the conventional centre left are in crisis across Europe this week, having been mauled in the elections for the European Parliament. A full post-mortem is yet to begin, but already some are blaming the weight of incumbency; voters often use the Euro elections as an opportunity to give the party in power a good kicking.

Here in Britain, the governing (and riven) Labour Party collapsed humiliatingly into third place, behind the UK Independence Party, with only 2.4 million votes and with a national poll share of 15.7 per cent – which dropped to less than 10 per cent in the south-east of England. It was Labour’s worst election result since 1918.

In Spain, too, the ruling Socialists suffered their first election defeat in a nationwide poll under the prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. In Portugal, the Socialists of Prime Minister José Sócrates saw their share of the vote drop 18 percentage points, with the opposition conservatives scoring a surprise victory.

Then there are those on the left who have laid the blame for the losses on various local, regional and national factors, denying that this is a Europe-wide phenomenon. The left in France has fractured into myriad parties in recent years, leaving the mainstream Socialist Party competing for votes with the New Anti-Capitalist Party, a Trotskyite movement, and the Left Front, an alliance of communists.

These explanations – or excuses – will not suffice. Incumbency did no harm to President Sarkozy’s UMP in France, Chancellor Merkel’s CDU in Germany or Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s PDL in Italy. All of these centre-right governing parties emerged triumphant over their social-democratic opponents.

The irony is that this should have been the perfect moment for centre-left parties to triumph. As the financial and economic crises have intensified, there has been much talk of the crisis of capitalism, the retreat of the right and the return of social democracy. It was not to be, and Spain’s centre-right newspaper El Mundo summed up the mood: “The traditional parties of the left should ask themselves why, in the midst of crisis, just when free-market theories appear to be most challenged, people continue to prefer [economically] liberal recipes.”

One problem for centre-left parties across the Continent, however, is that since the start of the financial crisis, parties of the right have moved left – appropriating historically centre-left policies, such as the need for higher public spending and greater regulation, not to mention the language and rhetoric of socialism. Ms Merkel has bailed out the carmaker Opel in Germany, while Mr Sarkozy has railed against the bonuses of “rascal bosses” in France.

Meanwhile, the results in Europe are all the more frustrating given the progressive political climate across the Atlantic. The conservative, free-market United States is now governed by the most social-democratic president in living memory.

So why have progressives succeeded in the US, but failed in Europe? First, as the right invades its ideological terrain, the left has no coherent narrative of how to organise the economy in the wake of the worst financial crisis in decades. Where, for instance, are the writers, thinkers and economists who offer genuinely innovative alternatives to the current economic order? Where is Britain’s, or indeed Europe’s, Paul Krugman? Second, the progressive parties in Europe remain bereft of popular, convincing leaders who can articulate their narratives. The days when Gerhard Schröder, Lionel Jospin and Tony Blair dominated their national political scenes and organised summits on the “Third Way” are gone. Gordon Brown may have earned plaudits abroad for his bank bailouts, but at home he remains weakened, insecure, and without a clear sense of ideological vision.

The hard truth remains that there is no fantasy progressive alternative, either in cabinet or languishing on the back benches, ready to galvanise Labour – no matter what Guardian writers might believe.

The Labour Party under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown has been compromised by its 15-year embrace of the City and the Thatcherite agenda of unrestrained free markets. It has only 11 months to convince those voters who have deserted the party that a centre-left government is still relevant and can offer a compelling vision for achieving social progress and sustainable growth.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

claubruroe
12 June 2009 at 18:10

You are mixing many things here, right traditional conservative parties do intervene in the economy and protect "national" enterprises, though not neoliberal-minded ones. Fear is a common theme among those most vulnerable, as well as middle-class when losing their living standards. And then, you talk of the left too easily, when many on the so-called left have been for years on the right or quite neo-liberal, so many in the continent prefer a "true" right than a "pseudo" left or "new" left. I think some more research is necessary here.

Pierre
13 June 2009 at 14:22

Progressive?

The financial collapse,

The teachers union

The civil servants

The justice system

The debt

The buying of votes

The prime Minister

The list is endless, enough of the "progressive" crap.The people need/deserve honest intelligent people to manage the country not treat it as their private fiefdom.

Daniele
14 June 2009 at 00:54

The collapse of the left is due to the fact that so-called leftist politicians have espoused the idea that global capitalism had won and that they had to adapt their politics to fit the new world order where true socialism no longer existed. In other words, they sold out, they became pragmatists and abandoned their principles.New Labour has fooled the electorate by governing on the right and people who previously voted Labour resent that betrayal deeply. People have no respect, and rightly so for politicians without principles. They don't see the point of voting for them if they don't believe in anything apart from gaining power.

So they prefer to vote for people, like the BNP, who seem to believe in something even if it is in extreme ideas. It is a very sad fact that the left, if there are still true socialists out there, have a long way to go to persuade people that they can reform our society . They would have to believe it themselves first!

taghioff.info
17 June 2009 at 03:41

"They choose to vote for people that believe in something, even if it is in extreme ideas."

Interesting point and so much for the end of ideology. It would be interesting to see some research on this.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker