Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

Don't blame it on the nurses!

Dave Prentis

Published 08 April 2009

George Osborne's scapegoating public sector workers for the excesses of his friends in the City is outrageous and an indication of current Tory thinking, argues Dave Prentis

Age of excess? What age of excess?

As the eldest son and heir of 17th baronet, Sir Peter Osborne, George Osborne has clearly had a very privileged upbringing.

Clearly out of touch with reality, he tried to deflect attention away from his friends in the City, the bankers and greedy speculators who have dragged this country into the financial crisis, by pounding public sector workers.

It was interesting to see the subsequent back-tracking as this outburst backfired on the Tory Party. However, it gives us a clear insight into Tory thinking and what would be in store should they succeed at the next general election.

His remark that “the age of excess is over” will outrage nurses, paramedics, occupational therapists, midwives, hospital cleaners and cooks – all my members working in the NHS, who have certainly never had an age of excess to get over.

They do not need to be told by the Tories that “we need an age of restraint and responsibility’ it goes with their jobs. Just because they signed up to a three year pay deal, in good faith, it does not make them part of the “debt problem”.

In fact many low paid health workers face long-term debt problems of their own. Last year NHS staff accepted a three-year pay deal, which is worth 2.54 per cent from 1 April this year.

Hardly excessive, it won’t cover the extra cost of everyday essentials such as food, fuel, transport gas and electricity.

A nurse on £22,000 a year or a hospital porter on £14,000 might be forgiven for wondering how this “age of excess” passed them by.

The deal covers more than one million health workers and was agreed through the NHS pay review body. Only recently MPs were awarded 2.33 per cent by their review body, which makes the two awards very similar. This suggests that the deal is not out of kilter with prevailing economic conditions.

The Tories cannot lay the blame for the economic crisis at the door of public sector workers, with or without three-year pay deals.

Local Government workers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have just been offered 0.5 per cent - just 3p an hour for hundreds of thousands of workers.

Instead of piling pressure on public sector workers, the Tories would do well to remember the vital role that local services play during an economic downturn.

In times of recession governments have traditionally turned to public services as their first line of defence. Our government is right to look at preserving jobs and boosting the economy by bringing forward a planned programme of public works – building roads, schools and hospitals.

George Osborne’s plans to make cuts in public spending take the “bulk of the strain” in order to balance the fiscal books is unfair and unworkable.

Public services are essential to the health and wellbeing of people and the quality and stability of local communities.

We are already seeing cuts across the public sector as a result of the recession but Tory plans go much further and would have a devastating impact. They would widen the gap between the rich and poor and create more long-term social instability for all.

Public sector workers were never invited to party on excess- it’s time the Tories told their friends in the City - their party is over.

Dave Prentis is General Secretary of UNISON, the UK’s largest public sector union with 1.3m members

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

3 comments from readers

ogadais
08 April 2009 at 18:33

The Tories are right to streamline bloated public services

and should focus on cutting the management of the NHS

which costs more then front line staff! The country can't

carry on spending money on a unreformed NHS which is

in a worse condition then labour inherited in 1997 with up

to 2000 people dieing of malnutrition in hospitals there's

the real scandal!

William
10 April 2009 at 17:02

Should look at the bloated wage constraints of the PFI and the hierarchical structure in NHS Trusts. Giving the unrestrained bonuses mirrors those found in excesses of the City.

Freeman
12 April 2009 at 08:22

'In fact many low paid health workers face long-term

debt problems of their own.'

Mr Prentice seems to see nothing odd in the fact that,

despite years of trade union activity and of Labour

governments, the 'low paid health workers' are still as

low paid as ever. Who hasn't been doing their job

properly, Mr Prentice and Mr Brown?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Also by Dave Prentis

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker