Cable wades into Chagos injustice row
Senior Lib Dem Vince Cable has thrown his weight behind a new cross party group that aims to persuad
By Sean Carey Published 07 January 2009
Vince Cable has attacked the "ruthless" treatment of a group of British citizens forcibly removed from their homes to clear the way for a US military base.
The Lib Dem shadow chancellor waded into the long runnning row about the treatment of the inhabitants of the Chagos Archipelago in the Indian Ocean ahead of the first meeting of a new All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG).
"Let’s not forget that this is a long-standing injustice which involves a group of British citizens who were ruthlessly dispossessed of their homeland for reasons of military expediency," said Cable commenting on the fate of the 2000 islanders removed by the British authorities between 1968 and 1973 and dumped in Mauritius and the Seychelles.
"Many will say that it doesn't matter because the number of people affected is relatively small but I disagree. We are dealing with real people here. Worse, the whole thing has been enveloped in secrecy and denial by successive UK governments."
Cable says that he only became informed of the Chagos issue around a decade ago. And he reckons that until very recently "the level of awareness of Chagos among the vast majority of my fellow MPs was about zero".
The main reason, it seems, for most people’s ignorance is historical: the original deal struck in 1965 between the then Labour government led by Harold Wilson and the US authorities was done in secret by an exchange of notes without either British parliamentary knowledge or approval.
It hasn’t helped public awareness either that attempts over the last decade to rectify one of the most shameful episodes in recent British colonial history has been carried out almost exclusively through the UK courts despite the best efforts of a small number of MPs including Jeremy Corbyn and Tam Dalyell to raise it in the Commons.
But the launch of the APPG could change all this.
Chaired by Jeremy Corbyn it has an impressive list of 39 recruits so far - including Baroness Ludford, Lords Avebury and Steel and a number of senior MPs like Cable, John Bercow, Peter Bottomley, Kate Hoey, Austin Mitchell, and Andrew Tyrie (who has worked hard to find out the truth about the use of Diego Garcia, part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, for the purpose of extraordinary rendition by the US).
Significantly, it also includes three former Foreign Office ministers who had responsibility for Africa and the Indian Ocean – Tony Lloyd, Chris Mullin and Lord Luce.
The APPG is a firm and calculated response to Foreign Secretary David Miliband’s narrow victory in the House of Lords in October which ended the hopes - in the British courts, anyway - of the Chagos islanders returning to their homeland which lies 1200 miles north of Mauritius.
Lord Hoffman’s remark in his ruling - "the right of abode is a creature of the law. The law gives it and the law may take it away" – which backed the use of the royal prerogative (issued in 2004 while Jack Straw was in charge at the Foreign Office) in continuing the exile of the Chagos islanders has both raised awareness of their plight and caused significant unease at Westminister.
"A number of parliamentarians have pointed out that it depends what you mean by the law," explains the Chagos APPG coordinator David Snoxell, a former British High Commissioner to Mauritius. "Parliamentary law could not possibly have taken away the right of abode of the Chagos islanders. There would have been political uproar had the Foreign & Commonwealth Office tried to get "proper" legislation through Parliament."
As a career diplomat who knows something about the culture of government institutions Snoxell is keen to strike a co-operative note. "I am sure that the Group will want to work closely with the Foreign & Commonwealth Office in finding solutions to these issues," he says choosing his words carefully.
"It will also want to work with the Foreign Affairs Committee which concluded in its report, issued last year, that there was a strong moral case for the UK permitting and supporting a return to the British Indian Ocean Territory for the Chagossians," he adds.
The first substantive meeting of the APPG is scheduled to take place later this month and is expected to cover a variety of matters relevant to the Chagos islanders including environmental conservation, security, the future of the 1966 Anglo-American Agreement for the US military base on Diego Garcia - which comes up for renewal in 2016 - and British sovereignty of the Archipelago which is disputed by Mauritius.
Some commentators have suggested that the obvious injustice involved in the treatment of the Chagos islanders will soon find its way on to the radar of new US president, Barack Obama. Vince Cable thinks that this is unlikely, however. "It would certainly be nice if it did but let me just say that I would be pleasantly surprised if anything positive happened in the near future on that front," he says.
Nevertheless, Cable is keen to give some advice to David Miliband. "The Foreign Secretary should make himself aware of the history of this issue and see what can be done for the islanders even at this late stage. Injustices can very easily fester in overseas territories because it's been all too easy for Britain to shuffle off its responsibilities. The Chagos issue is an embarrassment that won't go away. It would be much better if the government decided to deal with it."
Dr Sean Carey is Research Fellow at CRONEM, Roehampton University
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


13 comments
That's an original analysis of the electoral prospects of the Lib Dems, Carl. On the contrary, I see Mr Cable as their major asset whereas the election of Clegg as leader was a disaster for the party and indeed for the UK at a time when a real alternative is more urgent than ever. A man who voices indiscretions about his colleagues within earshot of the public, who cannot even hazard a guess at the value of the current old-age pension and who is daft enough to answer an interviewer's question about his personal life will surely attract only the votes of mindless harpies who aspire to being No. 31.
One is delighted to see heavy-weights in government lining up together to do something. It's a pity they don't do it more often and with matters of real and immediate import. But that would be difficult, wouldn't it? Crossing party lines on something important. Equals dead career, no offers of a drink in the bars, general snubbing all round, and off to see a head-hunter. Worse, a snarl from Mandy and Gordon or a sniff from David.
Well for justice its late it happens very long time ago, but for a new life with a better standard of living there is still time. Resettlement in the outer islands we are divided, I will not return in the outer island because I am a Diego Garcian I was not born in the outer islands which are 200 miles away from where I was born. Please dont make me a Chagossian this is not my identity nor does it help my case. How do I live my life? its in the UK that I live a new life with more than 1000 of my compatriots.Thats where we get a better education and good care. You are late my friends dont be too zealous than me.When one day the US decides not to stay on Diego Garcia then I would like to go and settle there, while keeping UK as my base, if not my descendants will go.Those who campaign please campaign for the right thing dont raise the poor people's hope.
Much appreciation to Sean Carey for his efforts to keep this issue alive and to get the news out there. A search on Google News for "Chagossians" sadly only brings up three hits, but one is this article. These unfortunate people may have been nearly forgotten, but not completely. Not yet.
http://theunpeople.blogspot.com/
It was the unpleasant - and leading "humanitarian" - Roy Hattersley who started the process. Has he ever been called to account? I don't think so.
Sorry, but more filler, it ain`t going to happen, there is no way on this Earth, with all the coming wars, that the NWO will give up the Chagos Islands. Not only are these Islands geopolitically important, they are also used as a "brainwashing facility" for those who have been renditioned....of course, Cable knows this is a "no hoper".....unless they set a 15 year handover date...then the Chagos Islands won`t be needed.LOL
Unfortunately the Labour government has shown itself to be without any kind of morality as you would expect of most normal people. Those that had any principles have since left the party. I would only expect worse from the Conservatives. However if there is any chance of justice for these people then all avenues must be explored and if possible those responsible for prolonging their current situation should be punished in a suitable manor.
Carl, mate, look there is no NWO. I mean you did have to know sometime, maybe your parents didnt have the heart to tell you.LOLOLOL
explodingbadger..."morality"...how can you have "morality" when most of the government/opposition has been recruited by either the CIA, MI6 or Mossad and if you were lucky to miss this, then you joined the Masons, or received a brainwashing course, courtesy of Common Purpose. Please don`t call me "mate"...my father was a copper who was almost press-ganged into the Freemasons.
Talk about "badger baiting"....Dr Henry Kissinger has just called for a new US strategy for a New World Order, so stop making a fool of yourself...please.
Well what evidence do you have to support all that ?
Conspiracy theories bring good causes into disrepute.
Sorry to hear about your dad.
Not wishing to be disrespectful towards the Queen, but what was she thinking when she used the Royal Prerogative to allow Jack Straw to overrule the courts and perpetuate a Crime against Humanity? Surely, she doesn't approve of this sort of thing, does she?