Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

If you want to get ahead, hug a Tory

Gideon Donald

Published 16 October 2008

David Cameron and I go back to the sinking of the Belgrano, both being “new bugs” at Eton

If you want to get ahead, hug a Tory

I need not go on, you know the rest. It is in truth a somewhat lazy manner in which to open a new column but, on occasion, the Bard is essential if only for the heft and hinterland that he alone conjures up with a few choice words.

The tide is coming in fast and it is a good time to be a Tory. The opinion poll leads remain implacable. Every week we assume a chink must appear in our double-digit lead; every week we are provided with further evidence of our impregnability.

And then the world falls in. One minute, all that was required was for us, in that overused phrase of Jenkins, to transport the Ming vase across the hall; the next, to move from Sir Roy to Del Boy, we are diving for cover as the chandeliers come falling down.

Our leadership's response has been tepid. There are those who predict a bright future for the shadow chancellor George Osborne, although I fear, based on his somewhat unconvincing physiognomy, he is more likely to encounter the kind of fate doled out to an unfortunate in a Saki story.

Anyhow, if he is to fulfil the predictions of others, it would be helpful if he were to cease appearing on the nation's television screens looking like a man who has an unmerited bonus cheque stuffed away in his back pocket. Guilt never becomes a politician.

Our leader-in-waiting, meanwhile, does not give the impression of having stunned the Oxford don Vernon Bogdanor with his facility for economics, not that, as I recall, Boggo was ever quite so complimentary during our tutorials. Still, it was only PPE.

These flaws have allowed the Clunking Fist (how apt that as a parting gift Tony Blair should lumber GB with our private name for him) to take centre stage and, most bizarrely, be cast as global hero.

Once again, however, his feet will be revealed to have the texture of clay.

It is one thing to throw money at banks, another to have to explain to the electorate that they are, in effect, a bunch of bankers. How will hoi polloi react to having a mortgage application turned down by a bank in which they have a stake? Not. Very. Well.

The global meltdown will, therefore, only cause a blip in the polls. The new Labour careerists who have reinvented themselves as new Tory evangelists need not worry. If you want to get ahead, hug a Tory. A philosophy best exemplified by the fact that you have a Tory, and a High Tory at that, writing for this magazine. If you can't beat them, employ them.

This sea change is down, in no small part, to Cameron and, of course, those who guide and advise him. Dave and I go back to the sinking of the Belgrano, both being "new bugs" at Eton during the Falklands War. David, as he then was, has always been a persuasive and fluent speaker, more often than not being among the early favourites for the coveted Loder Declamation Prize. His eloquence never better displayed than during the famous look-no-notes-all- my-own-work speech at Blackpool. He is masterful when reciting someone else's script. Dave's vanity, too, was on display from the off. He was, for example, the only Etonian to have a Corby Trouser Press in his room, not as an affectation but as a practical appliance.

At the time he felt more comfortable on the Lord Carrington/Francis Pym wing of the party, but as we moved, inexorably, from Eton to Bullingdon it eventually dawned on him that there was no future in the past. The party of Macmillan had no place in the world of Margaret Thatcher and the Big Bang. If the Establishment was to defend itself it would not do so with "a quick 18 after lunch and a sharpener at the 19th". Instead, we would have to work like grammar school boys. It was expected of us that we take Firsts. Rather counter-intuitively we would have to be New Old Etonians.

No harm in all that. Parties, even Conservative ones, must adapt or die. It was one of the many aspects of Margaret's genius that for the Tories to remain the natural party of government they must always act against type.

It was, perhaps, her only flaw to entrust this process of change to Estonians and not Etonians. An error almost certainly attributable to having spent too much time in cabinet meetings attended by Frank Pym.

This time there will be no such blunders. The hard thinking has been done.

We have moved from being Neocons to Nudgeocons. The sainted Keith had Friedmanomics, we have Nudgeonomics, the science, or maybe the art, of manipulating people to do your bidding without having to make the bidding explicit. Nothing could be more quintessentially, for want of a better word, Etonian.

The debate is on. Let us conduct it in these pages.

Gideon Donald will be writing regularly for the New Statesman

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

greed
16 October 2008 at 12:47

Are you for or against Mr Cameron ??

what substance are you basing any of your theories on

and why are you hanging on to Marmite Thatcher (you either love her or you hate her)

Visitor
17 October 2008 at 14:43

Gosh, what a silly piece. I am a Tory member and have worked for the party in the past, but - even to me - this piece reads like the biggest load of tosh. Is there anyone alive who wants to hear yet more about David Cameron's time at Eton and Oxford? Just for the record: it is not interesting, and has no bearing on the issues that politicians need to be dealing with, like sorting out the credit crunch. I know it helps the left to caricature the right as all about Eton and Oxford, but I don't think voters buy it - they certainly didn't in Crewe and Nantwich. Does Gideon realise he is being used by the NS, I wonder? You only have to look at the photograph accompanying the paper version of this article to see.

Cassandra
17 October 2008 at 19:46

The poll-lead of David Cameron's Conservative Party™ is, in my opinion, attributable mostly to public dissatisfaction with New Labour, and with the electoral tactics adopted by that Party.

The Labour Party has mostly abandoned its traditional core vote, in order to try to steal 'floating voters' from the Tories. Having done this, its traditional core voters have now realised that they are being played for fools, and so have stopped supporting the Party.

The voters who defected from the Tories to New Labour in 1997 are now sufficiently sick of New Labour to be able to countenance returning to the Tory fold. The result is an abyssal fall-off in support for New Labour, and a surge for the Conservatives.

Of course, the *key* to the Tories' surge in popularity under Cameron has been his Party's absolute refusal to bruit any of their actual Policies, concentrating instead on making statements along the lines of "we are for Good Things, and against Bad Things", which is a tactic that they learned from Baron Mandelson, and from Mr. Blair.

From an objective standpoint, regardless of my own personal political beliefs, I have to applaud the Tory Whips for keeping an iron grip on their Party's discipline in this regard. I cannot recall any recent slips along the lines of Oliver Letwin's "we'll cut £20 Billion from public spending".

Cassandra
17 October 2008 at 19:52

@Visitor:

"Is there anyone alive who wants to hear yet more about David Cameron's time at Eton and Oxford? Just for the record: it is not interesting, and has no bearing on the issues that politicians need to be dealing with, like sorting out the credit crunch."

Actually, it seems to me to be distinctly relevant - in these woeful economic circumstances, can ordinary people place the levers of power in the hands of a collection of hereditarily-wealthy career-politicians who spent their school and university years among the bankers who destroyed the economy?

Whose interests are more likely to be served by a Cabinet that comprises so many Old Etonians?

To clarify my point, I'm *not* trying to suggest that such people are concerned only with feathering the nests of their friends; just that, as they have been wealthy from birth, and so has everyone that they have ever known, they can have no possible idea of the financial constraints that are faced by most ordinary Britons.

goveller
18 October 2008 at 10:37

Why I wont be reading Gideon Donald (again)

I have never know such tosh! What are this guy’s credentials? Erstwhile friend of David Cameron? No new insights here (and do we really want to know that DC was an early favorite for the Loder Declamation Prize’ at Eton? – did he ever win it we wonder?). And old Etonians were all supposed to get firsts at Oxford (did they?). Nothing on policies –all on personalities (or lack of). Isn’t spin supposed to be a dirty word?

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Gideon Donald

Gideon Donald first met David Cameron at Heatherdown preparatory school in Berkshire. Their friendship continued to prosper at Eton and the Bullingdon Club. His column Preparing For Power draws on his remarkable access to Cameron's coterie. Despite threatening to resign after guest editor Alastair Campbell spiked his article, Gideon continues to write weekly for the New Statesman.

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the Iraq inquiry be a 'whitewash'?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker