Registered user login:

Tory weighs into Ross/Brand row

Brittany Peats

Published 29 October 2008

Shadow Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt criticises the BBC for its reaction to the Ross/Brand prank calls to Fawlty Towers actor Andrew Sachs

A senior Tory has attacked the way the BBC reacted to a string of offensive prank calls carried out by broadcasters Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand.

Shadow Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt was speaking just before the BBC presenters were suspended for leaving the inappropriate messages on Fawlty Towers actor Andrew Sachs's mobile phone.

Hunt said: “The BBC have not reacted to this problem in a way that has given the public confidence that they understand the very great offence that they have caused."

The two presenters have issued apologies to Sachs but there was widespread disappointment that the BBC had failed to issue a strong, timely apology. The organisation received over 10,000 complaints about the programme, which included lewd comments about Sach's granddaughter.

“I do think the BBC is a socially responsible broadcaster, I just think we need to hear that,” said Hunt during talk on the future of public service broadcasting at the London School of Economics.

But the Tory frontbencher stopped short of issuing a call for resignations.

“It is wrong, in principle, for politicians to be calling for heads of individual broadcasting to be removed,” said Hunt whose comments follow criticism of Ross and Brand by Prime Minister Gordon Brown and other politicians.

Many see a failure in the BBC review process of pre-recorded shows which should have been applied to the broadcast.

“I can't believe that [BBC director general] Mark Thompson really believes that it was appropriate for that broadcast to happen,” said Hunt. He expressed disappointment that the BBC had not released the name of the employee who allowed the programme to air.

The suspension of Brand and Ross will continue through to the end of the BBC internal investigation, which is being led by Tim Davie, the BBC director of audio and music.

Ofcom, the media watchdog, has also launched an inquiry which could lead to a £250,000 fine and compulsory on-air apology. In addition, two complaints about the scandal had been made to the police under the Protection from Harassment Act.

Hunt did stress the social responsibility that public service broadcasters like the BBC have to the public. “They receive huge public subsidies, both in cash through the licence fee and implicitly through spectrum subsidy and prime positions on electronic programme guides. Surely it is reasonable for broadcasters to take more responsibility for the social impact of their programmes.

“This is not to say they should be doing more “worthy” programmes with tiny audiences,” he said. It is important that the BBC continue to run entertaining shows and attract large audiences.

Simply because the offensive programme was broadcast late at night, after the nine o'clock watershed, “isn't an excuse,” said Hunt. “That kind of broadcasting can legitimise the kind of offensive behaviour that worries a great many people in the British public.”

There have been numerous controversies surrounding the two radio and TV presenters.

When it was released in 2006 that BBC had a £18m, three year contract with Jonathan Ross, much of the public was outraged. Ross's on-air style had been criticised for focusing too heavily on sex.

Russell Brand was fired from MTV for dressing as Osama bin Laden the day after September 11, 2001.


Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

7 comments from readers

kateslostsoul@hotmail.com
29 October 2008 at 18:40

this whole thing has been blown out of proportion. they made a joke they did go to far, they apologised for it. If russel did have a sexual relationship with andrew sach's granddaughter he was lieing he was just being silly. i am a huge fan of both and think this situation has been totally blwon out of proportion, they both are two fantastic comedians and now all of a sudden its against morals for comedians to make a joke, if the bbc didnt want to air it to the public they shouldnt have let it be broadcast thats their job, but instead of admitting fault they blame the comdians. Of all the racist jokes and complete slaunder of race going on at the moment and all the filth that plagues today's society it is simply swept away and people turn the other cheek, but two comedians make a joke and act a bit silly and all hell brakes loose. Its just corperate hotshots trying to make and example and look good for todays public by seeing to be doing the right thing.

gnuneo
30 October 2008 at 02:12

"But the Tory frontbencher stopped short of issuing a call for resignations.

“It is wrong, in principle, for politicians to be calling for heads of individual broadcasting to be removed,”"

well spoken. I'm glad that never happened under any Tory Administration.

"whose comments follow criticism of Ross and Brand by Prime Minister Gordon Brown and other politicians."

demagoguery does not win votes, as they will soon discover if they continue on this path. They will end on the crucifix of not censoring the BBC, after getting the People all worked up over what is essentially bug-all in the wider scheme of things (certainly shouldn't have happened though, and its good that there is now a stronger sense of lines to cross by such media intrusion), or else pushing themselves into the corner of being forced to censor, and then facing a massive wave of public criticism over political control. And it will come.

Ministers, Brown - STFU. You're not going to be able to ride this back to being popular. You should be ashamed of yourselves for interfering in such a menial matter. And don't try to use it to gain more control, either. Let it drop before *you* start to drop even lower in the polls.

sweety
30 October 2008 at 03:14

Russell Brand is not a sex crazy, ex druggie. He is a very sensitive and enlightened person. Russell's book, "MY Booky Wooky", available on the cheap from Amazon, and most Tesco outlets compares favourably with Dostoevsky's "House of the Dead". If the Booker lot were not biased for self hating, sub continental, post colonial hybrids, Russell would have won.

john problem
30 October 2008 at 10:36

Prank? Prank? It is such a pity that these two losers - in everything except money - are protected by expensive contracts. Where is the 'flexible' workforce thing where they are concerned?

taghioff.info
30 October 2008 at 17:14

Hypocrisy and moral posturing reach new heights.

War in Iraq, Saudi be-headings, not an issue.

Crude and offensive joke by a comedian at the expense of Manuel the waiter, national outrage.

Cybertiger
30 October 2008 at 19:03

The connection between Jonathan Ross and the war on terror ... is a terrifying waste of money and a terrible waste of life.

gnuneo
09 November 2008 at 01:17

best words so far:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/02/bbc-brit...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the international community intervene in Gaza?