Registered user login:

Still a Rape Crisis crisis

Theresa May

Published 15 October 2008

'Harriet Harman doesn't seem to appreciate the difference between a SARC, which focuses more on immediate health and forensic concerns, and a Rape Crisis centre'

Earlier in the year, newstatesman.com's campaign highlighting the severe difficulties in funding for Rape Crisis centres was widely welcomed. Along with the efforts of opposition MPs, campaign groups and Rape Crisis centres themselves, the campaign was successful in raising awareness of the serious problems facing these vital services, and prompted the Government to announce in March an emergency £1 million fund to prevent otherwise inevitable closures. But, seven months on, the crisis is far from over.

The establishment of the one-year emergency fund was a welcome step, but the real challenge is to provide long-term sustainable funding for Rape Crisis centres, not short-term emergency funds.

The Government still has not addressed this fundamental problem. In fact, there are signs that the emergency fund has had little impact itself. So far less than 20 per cent of the £1 million has actually been distributed to front-line services.

In the House of Commons last week I raised with Harriet Harman, the Minister for Women, the case of Barnsley’s Sexual Abuse and Rape Crisis Helpline, which may not be able to survive to the end of October without emergency funds.

They were prevented from applying for funding until the beginning of September because they did not fit the initial ‘emergency’ criteria. Yet seven months on their situation is now the definition of emergency.

Having filled out application forms as soon as they could, they are still waiting for the Government to make a decision. They simply don’t understand why it is taking so long. Their situation is a mirror of the position that many other Rape Crisis centres find themselves in, or will find themselves in soon without support.

The emergency fund was supposed to provide reassurance for rape crisis centres, not add to their uncertainty. Harriet Harman assured me that further awards will be made from the fund soon – we must hope that it is not too late for Barnsley.

But even if the emergency fund works without fault, we need a more stable long-term approach. It is frankly ridiculous for services as important as Rape Crisis centres to be living from hand to mouth each month, waiting on emergency funds that may or may not materialise. We have to give them better support than this. The Government largely misses the point, frequently resorting when questioned about this to boasts about the funding they have provided to Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs), as if this is of comfort to the hard-working practitioners and volunteers working in Rape Crisis centres.

Harriet Harman and her colleagues do not seem to appreciate the difference between a SARC, which focuses more on immediate health and forensic concerns, and a Rape Crisis centre, which may take a longer-term approach providing counselling and advocacy. Both are important, but provide different and complementary services.

I am pleased that the new Mayor of London has acknowledged this, and that his violence against women strategy will include provision for four Rape Crisis centres in London, in addition to SARCs. The Government’s national focus on SARCs to the apparent detriment of Rape Crisis centres needs to be addressed. That is why David Cameron has committed a future Conservative government to three-year funding cycles for Rape Crisis centres in order to end the constant uncertainty and give them the stability that they need to provide support to rape victims.

I will be returning to this issue over the coming weeks and months in Parliament. It is vital that Rape Crisis centres do not find themselves in the same position next March that they were in last March. That would represent a tragic failure of leadership from a Government that doesn’t seem to grasp the seriousness of the situation.


Rt Hon Theresa May MP is Shadow Leader of the House of Commons and Shadow Minister for Women

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Douglas Chalmers
15 October 2008 at 13:55

The British government has guaranteed the future of all banks - but NOT the future of rape crisis centres, may of which are staffed by volunteers.....

Not only does it seem hard to think about for most (male) politicians but this still seems an unpopular subject to write about. The last topic only attracted 3 comments, uhh http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/08/rape-crisis-...

But what are they going to do about the rapes - the violence, the sexual intimidation? Oh, nothing.....! Well, each man has ONE dick - propelled by an ego. So too are politicians propelled by their selfish and self-serving egos. Thus there is no change.....

Katie Russell
15 October 2008 at 15:19

Thank you once again to the New Statesman for highlighting our situation. Even though it's nearly three months since my own article about the funding difficulties at Barnsley Sexual Abuse & Rape Crisis Helpline (BSARCH) was published on this website, I'm sorry to say that we have still not benefitted from any Emergency Fund money.

Indeed, our circumstances have gone far beyond an emergency now, with Trustees having to pay staff wages out of our modest charitable reserves and our full-time Project Manager (me) leaving post to save the organisation redundancy costs. Less than two weeks ago, we were told that no-one had even started looking at the Emergency Fund applications, even though we returned ours at the beginning of September.

Even though I received my last pay cheque last week, I'm considering spending some of my own money on a dictionary, which I can send to Government ministers and civil servants, so they can take it in turns to look up the definition of the word 'emergency'.

UrbanOspreys
16 October 2008 at 00:04

This government has spat on the plight of raped women. We could smell a rat when all the talk of arresting men for visiting legal prostitutes was raised. It was a smokescreen for a series of covert cuts crippling the truly desperate.

Douglas Chalmers
16 October 2008 at 15:02

I was hardly impressed that this topic disappeared so quickly off the front page, uhh. Does NS have an issue with actually supporting womens' rights instead of wayward nonsense?

This article DOESN'T appear under either "Politics" or "UK Politics" although that is its header description. It is to be found under "Politics | Human Rights" instead. Makes it real easy to find.....

The sun wants to rest, it can rest.

The moon wants to rest, it can rest.

Women want to rest, they can't rest.

If women rest, the fire will burn out.

Cold wind blows at the elderly, and women use their backs to block it.

Splinter in child's feet, and women use their heart to pad it.

If there is a woman there, the old and the young will stay together.

If there is a woman there, the mountain may crumble and men will hold it up.

If there is no women under the heavens, the sky will not light.

If there is no women on the earth, the grass will not grow.

If a man does not have a woman, the man will be ill.

If there is no women under the heavens, there will be no men...

Country of Daughters http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=JsXCwNLaCWM&feature=related

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?